Why do people think platforms like Twitter and Facebook are there for them to practice "free speech"? Their sole purpose is to enrich their owners and you can only post things that don't affect the filthy lucre rolling in, they're perfectly comfortable with anti-semitism (as is wider society especially here in Scotland) and will only do something about it when it starts to hurt their pockets hence the sloth like action in this case.
Personally I wouldn't have banned him but then I actually believe in freedom of speech for all and all he has done is show his true colours.
Did I miss the similar thread for Katie Hopkins? Or is she not to be afforded the same rights as black anti-semites?
*Notes Compo's thread re Hopkins*
Freedom of speech if it ever existed has gone for ever and you can thank the left for that.