forlanssister

I don't think anyone doubts the debt of gratitude we owe Dave King, I dread to think where we'd be today without him and the Three Bears and I say that unequivocally. However that doesn't mean we can't doubt the timing and method of what's currently being proposed or rather imposed if you wish.

If Club 1872 is a truly a members organisation then surely it would ask the members how they want their donations spent? They should ask the following question to members. How would you like your donations to be invested in Rangers shares A - all my donation/s used to purchase shares directly from Dave King's holding. B - all my donation/s used to purchase new shares directly from Rangers. C - 50% of my donation/s used to buy shares directly from Dave King and 50% of my donation/s used to purchase shares directly from Rangers. It's a relatively easy option to set up and maintain which gives members a true choice.

Good to see you've escaped Mossads clutches once again The thread on FF reminds me of the shit we faced back in the days of Whyte and then Green. People finding the truth so unpalatable that they think shooting the messenger will change the facts. The thought of doing their own research on the veracity of the OP's claims never enters their closed minds. The OP of that thread on FF is absolutely impeccably sourced and his strike rate on such matters is 100%, his posting history like everyone else's is available for anyone to check if they can be arsed to put down their pitchforks for 5 minutes.

For those yearning for a sustainable model going forward this proposal takes us futher from that goal not closer.

If you think this is going to happen (barring a billionaire sugary daddy appearing) then I've got some bridges to sell you.

Falkirk 0 - 5 Rangers FGS Arfield

Rangers 3 - 1 Benfica FGS Tavernier

I concur, Jack started his career at right back for Aberdeen and would be a competent shove in.

Some truffle on the veal !

I remember someone on here trying to chase John Bennett away from investing in Rangers then posting smugly about it. The mind boggles.

Corner odds were garbage today so stuck a tenner on Kent to score from outside the box at 18/1 which complemented my fiver on 4-0 Arfield anytime at 33/1 so good day all round for a change ?

Rangers 4 - 0 Aberdeen FGS Arfield

David Grier wasn't "the enemy within" that particular sobriquet belonged to Donald Muir. I was present at the High Court in Aberdeen when it was first revealed that the Fiscal had ordered the raids on the defendants solicitors offices and removed all the defence files. I initially thought I misheard but it soon it became clear I hadn't. There was never ever any possibility of a successful prosecution after that revelation, the Keystone Cops could not have mounted a more inept investigation and prosecution.

Rangers 4 - 0 Hamilton FGS Goldson

Benfica 1 - 2 Rangers FGS Tavernier

Kilmarnoch 0- 3 Rangers FGS Morelos

Rangers 3 - 0 Lech Poznan FGS Tavernier

Rangers 4 - 0 Livingston FGS Tavernier

Standard Liege 1 - 2 Rangers FGS Tavernier

Them 1 - 3 Rangers FGS - Arfield

It's the usual mixture of loan repayments and some fresh capital.

Monstrous libel that! Rangers 5 - 0 Ross County FGS Tavernier

Rangers 2 - 1 Galatasary FGS - Morelos

Motherwell 0 - 3 Rangers FGS Tavernier

Willem ll 1 - 2 Rangers FGS Kent