Jump to content

 

 

forlanssister

  • Posts

    12,270
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

Everything posted by forlanssister

  1. He doesn't work for free that's for sure rumoured to be £6k a day at RSM Tenon, of course he's there at Lloyds behest not RSM Tenon's. They're in takeover talks with Baker Tily wonder what since of bonus Lloyds will give him for pulling that one off. A matter of days after Lloyds received their £18m in regards to RFC Donald Muir applied to dissolve his highly cash rich company Titanium Advisory Services of course that action meant he didn't have to file accounts to Companies House for the period that included the RFC "takeover" by Whyte so had the effect of hiding Muir's remuneration from prying eyes.
  2. How the f*&k does a cash injection of £25m put a club £18m in the red further in debt? I know what you're referencing but I'm saying Paul Murray is what you wanted according to your own criteria it's just that you can't see it.
  3. That wasn't Millers plan that was Whyte's plan as the leaked emails between Whyte and D&P conclusively prove.
  4. Then it's Paul Murray you wanted for it was his plan to recapitalise RFC with £25m rather than let it fall into Whyte's hands.
  5. If he settles for that he may a well not have bothered. It might be bloody, it might be messy but the simple fact is the board needs cleansed not more of the same.
  6. There's no doubt Paul Murray would stand aside if the need arose, he publicly stated that last time around. However that would only be temporary measure at best. Why would McColl go to all this trouble to and settle with a deal that leaves the present dysfunctional board holding power?
  7. I very much doubt that McColl would cast aside Paul Murray in that way. Interestingly idea, though perhaps Paul Murray would be replaced by the signatory next after him, but then again that won't do will it?
  8. He was utter crap that night. As noted at the time.
  9. Remember and tell him what you did to one of the signatories to the requisition order.
  10. In short re Alliance Trust: They came, they saw. they made some noise, they didn't get their own way then they departed the scene. However Alliance Trust certainly took them seriously and in truth they probably gave the Alliance Trust a kick up the arse it needed, ironically Laxey didn't hang around to enjoy the benefits of their labours.
  11. English is far more dangerous than the average Rangers hating journalist for he's far smarter than the average native born Rangers hating journalist. Usually hides his hatred well but on occasion lets the mask slip.
  12. What will the Easdale's do when they finally realise Green & co have suckered them?
  13. You've been reading David Low! Cazenove were listed as having 800k less shares than the Laxey deal entailed.
  14. True but they well and truly mitigated any potential downside. I'm surprised this deal wasn't listed as a "related party transaction" in the prospectus.
  15. Not stupid are they? Just goes to show the desperation for cash at the time.
  16. We've previously seen Easdales PR adviser briefing the press that the brothers owned over 6% which surprise, surprise was utter bullshit meant to deceive us into believing that they were far more important players in this game than the reality demonstrates.
  17. As convinced as you were that there was an "e" in Copland Road?
  18. Alas I'm not convinced it's a mock up.
  19. Ah well 12 is the new 7? Is the deadline for complying the requisition or agreeing to an EGM the 22nd or 23rd?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.