Jump to content

 

 

forlanssister

  • Posts

    12,217
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

Everything posted by forlanssister

  1. May have been on FF but it was posted here first before the twitterati knew!
  2. As far as I'm aware that's correct. http://company-director-check.co.uk/director/900106642
  3. I understand it to be so, I wouldn't have posted otherwise.
  4. Eric Drysdale Gary Allan QC Alastair Murning
  5. Perhaps that possibility is why BH went over Bennetts head and went direct to his boss.
  6. Perhaps it's not us but rather you that's being naive in this occasion.
  7. As is ably demonstrated by Ian Livingston who manages to do an excellent job as CEO of BT whilst being a non-executive director across the city. I wonder if a missive was sent to Sir Christopher Bland when Livingston took up his post across the city ? Any IFA is bound to have clients monies tied up in BT either directly or indirectly via trusts,bonds etc.
  8. If this statement is true (history may suggest otherwise though) then surely both would have to resign because this was the month after Mark Dalys' BBC documentary exposed Whyte in front of the world.
  9. The players have contracts with RFC plc nobody can transfer those contracts without the players permission, so Miller couldn't effectively employ them regardless of the transfer ban though I think that ban would be the final nail in the coffin anyway.
  10. I'd say on the basis of "kick em while you can". Yes this only about the fit and proper stuff nothing to do with the EBT stuff.
  11. I'm led to believe they can go down that route but the result would have to be a mammoth amount of new shares issued in order to render Whytes' shareholding impotent but alas that would also have the same effect upon the other 26,000 shareholders, also it could be subject to legal challenge.
  12. Almost but not quite, CVA can be a smart bomb while liquidation is strictly of the nuclear variety.
  13. Don't they have the power to issue new shares?
  14. His demands aren't just financial. The bigger question is just what the f*&k are Duff & Phelps playing at? that's now all 4 bidders who have raised doubts about them. How can they claim for Whyte to be either "absolutely irrelevant" and "not an impediment" when they cannot deliver his shareholding, they know everything that has gone on since October 2010 when they started working with Whyte on the "Rangers project" they devised and were handsomely rewarded for the business plan that has got us to where we're at.
  15. You have to remember those dealing with Whyte are not dealing with a rational human being they're dealing with a sociopath. http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html
  16. Only as long as he draws breath though!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.