der Berliner

Sorry to post a link to FF, but this is some very interesting research work ... Celtic vow to stamp out IRA chanting

Had any EPL manager seen him play for Vienna like he did for us (which they apparently didn't), we would not have seen a Jelavic at Ibrox. Good for us is the money involved, as he's on a long term deal, a full international and "on fire". Anothe goal or two to clinch the title will see interest from down south, be it ManU or someone else. They can all shift in with some big bids and even if 6m are involved, we may have to think about this. Not as hard as 14 days ago, but still. If they'd offer us Berbatov too (remember his wages though) and some money, I'd still say yes. But honestly, we'll have to wait and see and if he is being part of a title winning side for the first time in his career on Sunday, thing might not be as clear cut as they might seen to some on here (me included) just now. Humphreys ... can't see Liverpool really looking at the chap, all the rest may be, but Liverpool?

Had we kept silent, it would have been deemed wrong. Had we said something, it would have been deemed wrong. Such stuff is a lose-lose situation if you are thirty-party blamed without any chance of defence, since there is no "real" accusation. It all hearsay, assumptions and rumour-mongering.

IMHO it would give the team and the support another boost if we can sign him before Sunday and announce it just ahead of the game.

I've been about since roundabout 1983 and while only looking "in" from the outside - Iron Curtain and all, no chance to visit Britain that often - I always was under the impression that despite some minor peaks during Old Firm fixtures, the general religious "hostilities" between the OF and the supporters had more or less subsided during the late 90 and the 2000s. Probably going hand in hand with the changes in Northern Ireland. Sure, we and them always kept some hardliners, but the "masses" started to care less and less about a players up-bringing. Enter the 2008 league fixture fiasco, Celtic's behaviour all along the way, and the antics of their star players, not least Lennon and Thompson. IMHO, ever since it spiralled downwards, but - blue-glasses or not - the storm clouds always came in from the East End. Lies and slander galore, from top to bottom, culminating in verbal attacks on each and everyone, referees, SFA and whomever they fancied. And alway carrying the standard of victimhood before them, as if it was a valid shield to protect them against their vile and thinly veiled campaigns. I for one wouldn't be surprised if these bombs were send by Tims themselves, to deflect from their own vile intentions to influence the public while laying even more emphasis on their status as perennial victims. But they are not! Any sane intellectual will say that, any sane politician who actually looks at facts rather than headlines will see that ... and one hopes that the law-makers and those in power will see that too. I do hope that our new owner gets some decent QC in there to fight any lie and any slander (just like Nicky Campbell's today). In essence, there are many reasons to hate their club and this impersonator of a human being. His "race" and his religion are not the straws that break the backs of people like this poor Jambo though.

Keeping him welcome gives him the idea that he's actually "invincible" or "untouchable" with his press pass, which he isn't. He gets strange ideas because of it. He's not allowed to write anything he wants and thinks he can walk "unpunished". Thus, ... "a)" would actually only harm him, as every sane press folk will still get their accreditation. "b)" no, it won't be "him" sending someone, but the Times. And how long they will do that remains to be seen. For someone with brains donw there in London will actually take note of his ineptness. "c)" ... fair enough. "d)" ... surely not. But he gets even less publicity, as people will ask about his persona non grata status ... and if mud stucks to us, so it will stuck to him. "e)" ... he's been close enough for years now, and given his working behind the lines, as Leggat intimated, he used it to full affect. He is no enemy, he'S a charlatan with an agenda. An agenda that keeps him in the mouths of people.

C&P'ed my FF reply on the same topic: Yeah, takes a while to get the head around ... and sure, some informed FFers will hardly find much news in there. Yet, Leggat has e-mails and articles there which confirm that ... - British/Scottish people based in Scotland got UEFA going and had their own informants/contacts/agents working on their behalf solely against us - one of them pulled out all stops to get us into bother, contradicting UEFA's own judgement - an Austrian Catholic who was more upset and offended than the whole Spanish crowd that night (or the UEFA delegate). - much like Lafferty's Law, UEFA "invented" a new case out of an apparent closed one on behest of Scottish based people / organisations, one being the very same which only recently send their observers to our games with PSV, and ONLY to our games with PSV, none else. In essence: there's been an agenda being carried out against our support from before the days of Villareal and these very same people do their best to besmirch our name, be it that of Rangers, or the supporters. Hence Leggat calls for Whyte's attention, as one journalist belongs to these people and said journalist should become a "persona-non-grata" at Ibrox from now on. And no, I don't think one can acuse him of paranoia here. We all know that it is true.

While I know that the term has been freely used and thus does not always carry the full meaning anymore, IMHO, these people, from top to bottom, should always be counted amongst Legends. There's hardly been an era in recent memory that has been more difficult, yet, these men (and women) have stood up, rose to the challenge and succeeded*. *Yes, we're not there yet, but even if the unthinkable happens, those people receive my utmost respect for what they have delivered this season.

Not spotted it here so far ... there is a "nice" article about people posing with a gun outside Celtic's training ground in the Sun today. All have been arrested and while the paper claims that they had Loyalist flags with them, an FFer has indeed said that they are all Celtic fans (one of his friends' sister is involved). You wonder if these are the same people who sent those parcels to various destinations in Northern Britain? I had to smile while looking at the armed cop in front of the Hooped Horrors' training ground ... and that note about a parcel being mailed in Scotland, to a destination in Scotland, but via Belfast.

Transfermarkt.de says Schaars is valued at Euro 5,5m, while Roorda is priced at Euro 850k. These people can't give you real values, of course, but more often than not, they are close to reality. Bougherra, McGregor ... or maybe not: Jelavic.

The point is that McGregor's kick was not even mentioned until 10 days after the game. You've got it taped, so send a complaint to the SFA (asking for a receipt). Send the same to the SPL and Rangers. There shall not be different rules for us or them, no matter who "them" is. That's the second time this season Black was out to get him. I don't know his allegiances, but imagine what have happened had he hit Jela and the latter would be out for tomorrow.

Obviously, Diouf is IMHO a superior player than him and I am glad we have EHD with us for now.

He was chased and kicked by Timothy's hammer throwers all day long. No wonder that he did not make that great an impact (with the quality about him). When put alongside other quality people, one might see a better Eremenko too.

I do feel for him and his that they are not allowed to play Aberdeen three more times before the end of the season ...

Dixon clocked up 3 assists yesterday, let's hope he doesn't do so again on Tuesday. FF names numerous links in today's press ... - Spurs want McGregor for 5m (NotW) - Ivan Ivanov (Vladikavkas, defender) for about 2m - Andreas Granqvist (Groningen, Swede, defender) for 2,5m ... well, well.

As I said before, I would assume that they keep the debt, but essentially never want it back, i.e. waiving it. Or it could well be that for some reason or another, we pay back a given sum (100k per annum) into their accounts.

So has ManU's and ManC's and that of every other football club in the world. The point is, will someone want the debt back?

Londonstockexchange.com

BBC Rangers takeover documents are signed ... yet ...

Rumour on FF has it that Craig Conway was at Murray Park with his agent yesterday to become our first signing for next season. (Just relating this story, no idea whether true or not ... wouldn't mind him coming, since he can deliver a cross, is a freebie and wouldn't command high wages. Could bring Russell, Swanson, Dillon (or was it Dixon?) and Goodwillie along ... )

Jelavic ... you know, I wonder how teams think they can offer us peanuts for our stars when we can read articles like this one too: Jela has only just arrived and I doubt that this 17-year-old is as good as him nor has a 10-year contract at Anderlecht to warrant such a fee. If the EPl comes calling and wants to deal with us, they should do so with mega-bugs or stay away. Anyways, this Jela rumour is just that, a rumour. And it comes at a very important time in the title race. Much like the Bougherra stuff.

Nope. As I understood Murray (the Paul version) he wanted do a share issue for these 25m, thus, unless I am mistaken, creating more Rangers shares for the market? He's got someone to underwrite them, someone who would instantly hold that amount of shares and become a major shareholder too. Why wouldn't that be possible under Whyte would be my question? Essentially, he could equally swap allegiances from Ellis to Murray, King or you-name-him too, looking for a better option/-s to raise money. Just a few points that sprang to mind.

I for one assume that hardly anyone knows anything of substance. What's in the press need not to be correct either, usually, we hear "representatives" or "close-tos" talk, but not David Murray, Whyte or the like. In essence, we will have to wait and see. As for debts moving ... yes, but the thing is that as long as we are tied to Murray, MIH and Lloyds, the latter will squeeze us dry. Every club has debts, but most are long term with fixed pay-back rates. And they still work "wonderfully well" when it comes to finance the football team as such. If Paul Murray or King or whatever mysterious backer wants to help the club, they should stop their little wardances and get together with Whyte. But as long as there are big egos involved, well ...

More a case that neither is entirely wrong. It is usually best to wait 24 hours before commenting on rumours and hearsay (no insult intended, BTW).

It's be what 4 to 5 hours on since this thread started and there is no indication whatsoever that any news outlet caught wind of it? (Source: NewsNow)