Jump to content

 

 

Juancornetto

  • Posts

    1,899
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Juancornetto

  1. There's lots of documents and stuff I'd like to pour over sitting on computers or in filing cabinets but I'd LOVE to see the justification for giving Kyle Hutton a new contract .

     

    What was the criteria? I imagine it to look like this:

     

    1. Keeps his mouth shut

    2. Turns up to training

    3. Disnae gamble

    4. Like's a Nando's.

  2. Do you seriously believe the monarchy or westminster parliament is involved in HMRC cases ?

    The question I ask is whether a caucus of yahoo-supporting polticians have been using influence on HMRC to financially cripple Rangers by pursueing a case so weak it has failed their own two internal appeals

     

    Of course I don't that's my point. HMRC went after us in particular because of the scale of EBT use. It was prevalent in a lot of other clubs but Murray used EBT's so commonly that the potential return for the revenue was too big to ignore and that has also clouded their judgement when deciding to appeal and appeal again.

     

    It's a nice story Rab but I don't see any rhebel influence on that front. They've exerted their through the media.

  3. It's the biggest case of unrequited love in history. The "Queens XI" is the one that amuses me most though, the thought that the Saxe Coburg / Battenberg / Windsors have the faintest idea who or what Rangers are supposed to be is absurd and how Her Majesty could allow such loyal subjects to be...subject...to the agony that Rangers fans have gone through at the hands of "The Revenue" is beyond me.

  4. since i don't to click on any tarrier sites, whats been said by the evil p****s this time?

     

    The ill one penned a blog titled "The ****** Blood Festival"...don't think I'll need to elaborate on that, you know the drill with Phil, and there has been a concerted effort from Haggerty etc to establish the narrative that poor wee innocent Celtic fans will be subjected to violence, threats, racism, sectarianism, veganism, agnosticism and a whole load of other isms. Shamefully, the main stream media have bought into this narrative and the police seem to be too.

     

    The RST statement beautifully tackles this and unmasks the "concern" for what it is....naked hatred.

  5. it looks like the fat man can do anything I have now lost faith in the three bears and king there will be no more season tickets bought from this house

     

    The 3 bears and King may yet win the day compo. An EGM is our only hope of turning the tables on the board and their predatory investors.

  6. Hey guys

     

    I'm Dave been lurking round this forum for a couple years now figured it was about time to sign up and contribute or just go back to lurking in the background either way it's good to be part of a great Rangers community here!

     

    A couple of years? Long overdue mate, get involved, only a couple of them bite :-)

  7. D park has serious cash. Not the same as sarver or Ashley but he will put in more than Ashley by millions and doesn't have a basketball team to fund like sarver.

     

    The wealthiest of the lot (McColl) has contributed 10,000 shares to the RST. All £2k worth.

     

    It's him that I am most disappointed in tbh. He could have stepped in at any point in the preceding two and a half years and underwritten a complete purchase. Of course there's the issue of the toxic board keeping all the goodies to themselves but they and the shareholders are in it for money. Jim McColl could have satisfied that demand without denting his wealth and he'd have had most of it back by now.

  8. Sorry to ruin Frankie's United Front, but the first paragraph should be 'are utterly revolted' not 'utterly repulsed', the 2nd para should read 'offering it up' not 'for it to be offered up', and the 3rd para needs to reverse the order of the third and fourth clauses.

     

    I slept on it overnight and it's still making me itchy, much like RF's 1872 option which, apparently, sees the buyer 'taken on the burden of others'.

     

    I know this is my problem and not theirs. I'm really sorry.

     

    Grammatical Pedantry Syndrome

    Grammatical (or grammar) pedantry syndrome is an illness or a form of obsessive-compulsive disorder where someone has a compulsive desire to correct any grammatical errors one has made and is obsessed with taking this peculiar, constant, and vexatious (from the target's perspective) action.

    "Me and mark ate cookies!"

    "You mean, 'Mark and I ate cookies!'"

    "Stop it!"

    "Sorry, I have Grammatical Pedantry Syndrome."

     

    We suffer in syllables

  9. If we use a fitting analogy of a Bear I see Whyte as someone who hunts down a bear to kill it and sell on it's fur etc; Green as someone who buys a dying, pregnant bear, let's the mother bear die after the birth, then takes the baby bear and teaches it tricks before selling it to a circus which only cares about expoiting the bear for money; finally Ashley as someone who puts a tap into the bear's stomach to collect bile and sell it to the Chinese.

     

    Sarver seems more to be about taking the bear, bringing back to good health and then putting it in his safari park for people to pay to see and so make it pay its way.

     

    A harrowing but all too accurate analogy Calscot. Nicely done.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.