-
Posts
125 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Shane
-
-
I think some are taking their conspiracy theories a bit too far.
I always want to have some long convo with you about life etc, then I see your avatar and laugh and pop on CYE.
0 -
Cleverly hinting at wrongdoing without revealing specifics!
Can't do much more, mate. I'm not big enough to take on all the parties involved, as you know. The framework has been laid.
0 -
Ach, go on....
Best I can do, brother Zappa - http://www.thecoplandroad.org/2013/04/green-ahmad-and-endless-stream-of.html
0 -
Spill the beans!
A forum exclusive? Who do I look like, Imran?!
0 -
I may just write a story I've been hanging onto for a while here, have some fun, stir shit up.
0 -
CRO and TRS have both built up enough kudos for me to take your word that there is something concrete behind this revelation.
It doesn't mean I wouldn't eat my own arm off to find out what it is though.
#lions
Definitely not an instance where we're miles away
0 -
Not going to get caught up in schematics or semantics re: the stories from yesterday. All I can say is I don't like signing my name to things if I don't feel it's true. Been writing and reporting off and on for the better part of a decade and can count on two/three fingers the number of times I've been burned.
0 -
Cheers mate
0 -
0
-
certainly a higher caliber of invester than we have had so far.
except guy gisbourne of course. he's properly famous.
Dunno mate, I hear that Mathers guy is quite lyricist.
Oh, wait.......
0 -
RTC having it first would be no surprise. Legal firms working on things for David Murray and Rangers appear to have had a lot of leaks filtering information to our enemies.
Amazing how that works out....
In any case, glad we're talking about it now. And that they're laying all the credit at Bill's feet for whatever reason
0 -
Where was that again?
Apparently RTC had it a while back. I've never read their stuff, and seeing as I, Andy, Bill, Chris, and Other Andy all had chats about whether or not to publish it, none of us were aware of it. I got it in an email quite a while back.
So, there we go.
0 -
won't load on the phone but it will confirm if whyte was lying yesterday.
Sorry guys, don't know what's happening with the phones. Some it's working, some it's not.
0 -
Fuck them all. Can't even enjoy watching Jelavic at Everton because that Cuntsmith is there.
0 -
I'll be the first to recommend a travelling exhibit for supporters around the world. Maybe, say, Chicago could be the first stop?
0 -
The Pritchett article's not two months old. You're mistaking our silly way of writing dates over here. It was published on Monday.
0 -
Just out of fairness, the lawsuits against TSE we tossed out and Miller successfully counter sued.
Can't believe I'm talking about Bill Miller again....
0 -
Yeah, that was the shell I built the new site on. It's of course supposed to be running through the http://www.coplandroad.org like before.......
0 -
I really really wish I could get these DNS issues sorted so my links would work right. In any case, Bill's back today with a message for his old friend.
0 -
Whatever it is I've made the decision, after a series of talks this week with my staff and the organizers, that we're not going to be part of this anymore. We write opinion as our purpose. We don't really need someone else to do it for us and sign our name.
I'd say most of the problems from my perspective just come from the bad timing of everything I've had going on and not being able to be involved in the process.
0 -
If Gersnet came out and officially said, as a sort of mission statement, that it wanted an Orange strip, there's no way I would post on it.
Not under my real name, anyway. I thought the only criteria for membership was being a bluenose (which it is, we all know that) and to put your name to this plan or that plan, or support this person or that person would just smack of site admin/owners getting too far up their own jacksies.
Now you know how to get rid of me!
We'll never officially concern ourselves with strip colors at CRO, and there are consistent rumours of biscuit-based compensation flying around.
0 -
Where did this idea that messageboards can adopt a position that reflects the wishes of their members come from?
Blogs, aye, fair enough. But boards? Even here, with a select membership, we can't agree on the manager, the players, the formation, the owner, the previous owner, the administrators, the SPL, a boycott, the Orange strip...to imagine a messageboard can represent an entire constituency is just mad.
I don't know how it'd work here. Running a forum sounds like complete hell to me.
But I'd guess that the forum is in someway an extension of the editorial ideals of the site itself, so if the 'staff' of the site could come to a consensus that'd be its position. Then forum members with dissenting opinions could, of course, always discuss them on the boards.
0 -
I don't type fast enough to keep up with Craig and my mind runs at a third of the speed too, so it's a non-starter.
Turn off your first run press of Weasels Ripped My Flesh and get your head in the game, man!
0 -
It might be better not to take it so personally Shane. I'm sure there's more Bears out there who show appreciation for the work you do than there are who show a lack of appreciation for it....
You should join mine and Craig's email chain
0
Laxey Partners plan to back current board
in Rangers Chat
Posted
More from Kingsnorth over on CRO: http://www.thecoplandroad.org/2013/11/colin-kingsnorth-on-laxeys-recent-share.html