Jump to content

 

 

andrew_2010

  • Posts

    912
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by andrew_2010

  1. Where was Nacho Novo's new 2 year contract? He was younger than McCulloch aswell!

     

    That was what surprised me more about this announcement... We couldn't offer Novo 2 years, but McCulloch we can? Unless its just the timing of it all? Or maybe Novo wasn't as loyal as he made out? I mean it took "minutes" to sort out lee's deal. I doubt it, but there has to be some sort of explanation to this puzzle...

  2. Miller has been a standout in preseason, and has to me displayed why he is indispensable with our squad the way it is. If 2 strikers of better quality were to be brought in I could understand it, but better the devil you know. We know he will get goals and play well. new signings, you never know!

  3. That is my understanding of the matter , I dont believe he needs Rapid's consent

     

    Wow, if this is the rule, I'm surprised it is not used more frequently... I mean there are plenty of folk who could sign a deal a year in advance... and for players going to a bigger club, you'd imagine that they'd be too important to not play for a year.

     

    Not sure if we can wait a year, but it's interesting to know about the rule...

  4. The matter of pre contracts has been discussed before and in fact Frazer Wishart of the SPFA has been on record stating that you could in theory sign a pre contract with Club B , a day after signing for Club A , the 6 month time scale is a bit of a red herring with regards to the actual signing it refers to the time scale in which a player is free to talk to any other club without informing his present employer

     

    so can he simply "inform" rapid that he is talking to us and then sign a deal starting next year NOW? where as he wouldnt have to tell them if there were 6 months left? or would he need rapids consent to speak to us?

  5. Lafferty must step up if he deserves to wear the number 11... Can't remember who all has worn it, but I know Albertz did well with it, and then Adam had it did he not? Not sure who had it inbetween them, but it has never been a true '11' as tradition would dictate. I recall McCann wearing 18, the closest to an 11 I recall in the past decade... oh for a Laudrup or a Cooper to magically promote themselves from Murray Park...

  6. selling davis could prove to be the straw that breaks the camels back for a lot of fans. can see a few sbs being returned if that happens.

     

    I fear worse if Davis is sold behind smith's back...

  7. also, bookies look after themselves. So maybe it's all the punters that see lennon as their saviour, plus neutrals backing them because of our financial situation. Probably was the same last year too.

     

    Means nothing to me, roll on the new season!

  8. Well that's that signing confirmed. I wonder why a trial (in which they know he can't play in either of the friendlies) is necessary? Also, how long do work permit applications take? Surely not a good idea to delay signings waiting on the outcome of the application?

  9. 0-0 full time.

     

    got to watch the last 10 mins and looked pretty rough.

     

    unfortunately the only thing we seemed to get out of the game was a couple of injuries. McCulloch I saw, but sounded like Miller too judging by what the commentators were saying. :(

  10. was surprised to see �£400k mentioned though. Would Hamilton have agreed that price with us? Young Scottish players are always a plus to have in your team, but would much rather they were coming out of Murray Park. Big year for the ethos of promoting from within!

  11. Strong rumours on FF that Davis and Miller will be out the door next as bank have reneged on deal with the club.

     

    Is this just scaremongering? Why are banks letting the likes of Barcelona, Liverpool, Real Madrid and Man U to carry the debts, but not us? Our level of debt isn't that unmanageable is it? well it soon will be if they continue to cripple us this aggressively!

  12. Can't see him getting many games at all in the next few seasons which will only hinder his progress and payments to us i guess.

     

     

    He'll most likely be loaned out. It's probably them with an eye on the new Home Grown Players Rule... (If that's going ahead) and the lack of English players they currently have!

     

    Any guesses as to where he'll be loaned out?

  13. I know what Wilson's squad number will be at Liverpool - 67. You heard it here first.

     

    Where did you hear that? And does that make his choice of 66 at Rangers significant? 66-67? If so, that is pretty shocking, but at least we're getting �£2m possibly �£5m for him...

  14. I still fail to see how Novo couldn't have been given a new deal. I understand that Smith needed 1st team football, and the Thomson deal, the Boyd thing seems to be more self-orientated...

     

    But who could we sign that would have been better than Nacho? especially with the all-so-public financial limitations...

  15. I haven't seem enough of him to make a comment tbh, but do we not have any young players who would be just as good as him??, Fleck would feature more for me before we took a gamble on McArthur!!

     

    McArthur would probably be worth "more" because of the game time he's received. I think he seems a decent player, but thought this is a likely deal as he seems to be a player Walter likes. Seems strange we're looking at Holman as he sounds like his position is that which would be best suited to fleck...

     

    Interesting summer... roll on the actual football!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.