trueblue 64

King has spoken to the investors, surely his next move should have been to talk to the board instead of muddying the waters further.

From where i am sitting, it's clearly the majority. The Spiv Defenders number a mere handful all from the one forum.

5400 is only 15% of our season ticket holders so it is a small minority.

more childish than pretending no one protests.

 

it like a kid sticking his fingers in his ears and going lalalalla

 

but tomorrows leaflets are about spreading the word on the 5000 plus strong union of fans.

I have never said no one is protesting , isaid no one SHOULD be protesting. We have a minority trying to impose their will on a majority in a timmy like fashion. Until tax shy Dave comes up with some dosh he is no better than all the rest of the tyre kicking wannabees that have come before him.

First I was Jack, now I'm Charlie boy, yesterday I was a road sweeper and Bearger reckons I'm a tim.

Very childish way to debate opposing views.

There should be no back the board banners or back the rebel banners, the 20 odd thousand not singing anti bord songs as well as the 20 odd thousand discarded leaflets will say more than **** like rebelling.

30k leaflets to be handed out, i wonder who is paying the cost of picking up the 25k leaflets that get discarded.

Let's not get sidetracked here please folks. The number of accounts reported as being 'registered' on another forum is of zero relevance to this topic.

Usually an admin would come on and say stop having snidey digs at another Rangers forum instead of having a snidey dig at the same forum.

Been a long day & I needed a laugh, cheers for that!

You are easily amused.

37,865 to be precise.

Frankly, how many fans do RM represent?

Just shy of 38 thousand.

Threats of violence are wrong, end of story. The Board need to offer an olive branch, not release more sympathy seeking PR though.

If the threats of violence were not made there would be no opportunity to release "sympathy seeking pr"

Both sides need to cease with the constant attacks before any olive branch can be offered.

I think it is disgraceful if members of the board have been threatened online, which no one seems to be denying, I don't use that site so don't know if it's true or not. I find it sad if true that the thread is then hijacked by a sob story to deflect away from the op. Maybe the old guy has been sitting in his free seat hurling abuse at the board every week, maybe not.

If threads are being taken from other sites, maybe this could be stated in the title.

Posting Leggos blogs leaves you open to legal action, but feel free to carry on if you must. If people want to read the shite posted on ff, they should log on to ff.

I wish people would stop posting shite from ff, the same applies to Leggo.

Well, in that case, I can only offer humble apologies.

 

You see, I had thought you were simply a mouthpiece for the board, possibly paid, certainly with an agenda. I probably thought that due to your unquestioning support of anything and everything they say and the highly insulting and inflammatory language you use when attacking anybody who expresses opposition to them.

 

I had no idea you were providing such a valuable service to the online community by bringing balance, fairness and light.

I get paid is a ludicrous accusation, and you are not the first to suggest it which makes me think this is rebel policy towards anyone backing the board. I have insulted no one on here unless they have insulted me first and my inflammatory language is way below that directed at the board.

have you ever posted on any subject other than the board and/or those looking to take over at Ibrox? I'm just asking because I don't ever recall you posting on something like, oh I don't know, football, maybe?

 

A suspicious person might think you're not really a Rangers fan at all, having so little to say about the team or players or manager. You *do* know who the manager is, right?

I am on this site and RM almost every day, I visit an equal number of football and boardroom threads. The football threads on this site are fairly balanced and see no need to comment other than to add my agreement to viewpoints. The boardroom threads on the other hand are usually heavily one sided and I feel the need to add my viewpoint. Take this thread for example, had I not read this thread until now I would not have commented as balance has been added today by darthter and der berliner. I am by nature a non commenter as is proved by my low post count, but I will not stand by and see my club criticised and smeared by non contributing shit stirring rebels who offer virtually no proof to their outragous allegations . If no one else defends my club I WILL speak up.

That statement is spot on, the only bitchy comments I see are the ones following it. If its bitch fest you are after get yourself along to the meet tonight.

Frankie I have the utmost respect for your opinions, and I agree you try your best to remain neutral.

As regards to sos, I was replying to several posters who were inferring my 'quality appointments' included the criminal Easdales. Championing sos was probably a bit strong, but I seem to remember you saying they were a breath of fresh air and worth listening to.

Not nice when people misrepresent your opinion, eh?

Could'nt agree more with this.

http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=261573

That's not me, that's trueblue 68, but I see you doctored it to look like me.

Well you're a workshy git then. Get a job!

 

Really, this is too much. 'The rebels dirty tricks campaign'? The 'rebels' have had about six months to oust a dysfunctional board which is the worst in the history of the club, running the club's finances into the ground and dishing out tasty payoffs to themselves when they feel like they can't be arsed with it anymore. And they are still not in place! Had they tried any dirty tricks they would have been in place ages ago. It was their (in hindsight) disastrous decision not to push for the EGM which has allowed the present lot to hold on, zip to do with Jack Irvine or anyone else.

 

All Irvine has been is an embarrassment to Rangers. Unless one is related to him, it is beyond comprehension why any Bluenose would support anything he has done, regardless of who they back in the boardroom.

Self employed you smug git

I seem to remember reading you writing sanctimonious nonsense about Frankie on another forum too, saying that he's got an agenda and other stuff which wasn't correct or fair. In fact the way you wrote it implied that you are pro-Rangers and Frankie isn't. You should try to get your facts in order before shooting your mouth off about other people. In fact better still, just don't comment at all and you'll come off better.

Absolute bollocks, show me where I said this.

Jack's job? I wonder what the hell that was, since his actual effect has been to make Rangers look like a shambles, insult players and fans, drive away potential investment and ensure division for the foreseeable future.

 

When you see every - and that's EVERY - educated, professional poster on here condemning Irvine (I'll pass on the cosy first name terms) and only you backing him to the hilt, it's obvious that his PR has been an absolute disaster for Rangers. And given he will only be doing what he's instructed to, his bosses likewise have been & will continue to be an absolute disaster for Rangers.

 

Keeping the current main shareholders in place will only increase our insecurity by another year. And let it be clear to you, Jack, and those you work for - if the present lot are in place

after the AGM they won't be getting another penny of my cash. When you can push away a fan of 30 years standing, you know you're doing something wrong to the overall health of the club.

 

Job done? Only if you're working for the tims.

Jack was only brought back to counter the rebels dirty tricks campaign, so blame them for his presence, I agree he would be better gone.

I work for NO ONE.

Excuse me? Who have I championed and advised backing?

SOS, I seem to remember you stating they were a breath of fresh air and deserved to be listened to.

That sounds pretty clear cut, when are you expecting it to happen?

Before the AGM.