simplythebest

Absolutely true

It helps me form a view, only Easdale himself knows his intentions for sure. For all the hassle they and their families have had and lack of salary not to mention their reputation being made worse than before they've certainly not gained much on the face of it

Never said they were misunderstood, end of the day they failed badly

I mentioned their use of Jack Irvine in this thread before you did. It must be understood that giving a bit it leeway to someone's character is not making them out to be wonderful or showing a desire for them to still be in position, you're well aware of my views on the previous board especially the last few weeks. I don't know the Easdales either so I completely accept I may be well off the mark. As ever I don't believe that you should hold back an opinion because it will likely be unpopular. Although you're kind of backing up my view that they just weren't bright enough

The statement backed up that he hasn't had a salary from us and he's taken a sensible exit route while Llambias and Leach still seem to went to drag everything out and cost the club more money

No, it's been suggested they do on here as a suggestion for Sandy Easdale walking away. Personally I'd rather take it at their word that an amicable parting of the ways has been reached and move on

I'm not saying I felt they had the talents or any long term future, and they clearly got in too deep with Ashley and co in particular. The continued association with a scrote like Jack Irvine did them no favours either. I just struggle to believe they were badly intended, bearing in mind also they now have to continue to live and run their businesses in the West of Scotland.

So King and co have incriminating evidence about a Rangers director of around two years but have done a deal to not release it? So much for transparency

We'll see what the papers say tomorrow

Don't follow?

You're assuming I'm happy, I think Chris has a lot of online baggage besides this and it would have been easier on us all if Paul Murray had chosen someone else, I'm never happy with the club getting bad coverage. I said Green's comments were much of nothing and I've already said I couldn't care less about the tweet.

I never reacted with glee, I merely said that it's hard to see him surviving this, that's the society we seem to live in nowadays. Although let's be honest, if Easdale had been caught up in a scandal like this people would have been more than happy to use it to their advantage.

This is as low as possible on my list of reasons for not thinking Chris is appropriate to be a director mate.

Why are the BBC choosing to run with it?

I'm not taking anyone's side, with the bad publicity due to come of this it seems difficult to see Chris surviving at a time where we need positive PR for a change. I could be wrong. The tweet didn't offend me in the slightest.

If he's absolutely the crook that was made out though then why drop the investigation? I've much more respect for both Easdale brothers giving up without fuss than Llambias and Leach holding out till the bitter end.

It's another example of something that seen as racist and offensive whether we agree with it or not. Personally I'm far from being PC about these things.

For a club that covered up paedophilia that's not a huge shock

If Green couldn't survive paki-friend gate then Chris can't survive this surely?

The fact that there's been an amicable end to his time and a confirmation of him not taking a salary back me up in my opinion.

Think he got a raw deal tbh, out of his depth but not badly intended

I take it being at the two games since the regime change don't count as being on board? I see no greenco backers anyway

Good interim option anyway, his job at Motherwell is underrated

So basically you're saying they were rewarding their allies rather than Rangers fans as a whole? I did support the requisitioners as it happens albeit more on the basis of them being the better of the only two options facing is.

This has arguably been the worst season in the club's history mate with one horrible match after another, all the while sitting amongst increasingly cold empty conditions. I don't know about you but giving up has felt more appealing at times. I'm not expecting or wanting an invite but it does seem like all credit is going towards one 'section' of the support and it's being done to death. Are they entitled to sit in the box whenever now or was it a pure one of? In King's view did those of us who kept going let him down? Does he even want us to renew for next season?