simplythebest

Glasgow Muslim Leaders don't sound very happy about it

nice to be back to arguing about football stuff, isn't?

I've been arguing about our previous coaching team for a long time mate

I've been accused of unbelievable opinions plenty in the past, but that there's still a defence out there of McCoist and McDowall as managers/coaches is incredible to me. Their time is a sorry chapter in our on field history and I'm relieved we're starting to move on from it at last, credit to the new regime for moving quite fast as well.

Enjoyed his interviews, more inspiring than anything McCoist and McDowall have been coming out with these last years

Yes, it certainly was; but they did give him the perfect excuse.

Snap see #449 at exactly the same time 11:07!

The fact he went ahead with the process when he knew he was out on his ear was simple spite

It was payback for the vote of no confidence.

Then disbanding was pay back for the minutes

I reckon King has saved us.

Can't get my head round people who aren't grateful to him.

chances are he'll lose his money again and he probably knows it

I said similar about Green and still get slaughtered to this day.

I've learned too much trust in anyone is a bad idea

Sums up the disgrace we've been under the current coaching staff, a day off after that on Tuesday ffs

and probably with some encouragement from some of 'our own'

You're over egging this unfounded accusation quite a bit mate

Ignoring and/or prevaricating seems to work well enough for Celtic in that sense.

 

I doubt many Muslims could care about Rangers and one of its lowest profile directors.

Celtic's treatment and coverage is far different to our own as we've especially realised over the last few years.

Whatever happens I can't see ignoring it being a good idea

At the end of the day the club's reaction should be simple. Ignore.

 

What's good for the goose...

Yes it is but the point about contempt and antagonism remains valid.

Of course, I'm sure you've seen my comments on Llambias and Leach.

Was just a pedantic observation

I'd say for certain that some of our own would have been part of this witchhunt against CG.

You have nothing to back it up though do you?

For anyone who believes that L&L gave a single jot for the feelings of us, the fans, just take one look at this photo. Bear in mind the backdrop to this show of total contempt, arrogance and crude antagonism - an AGM with hundreds of furious shareholders venting sheer frustration at the rape and plunder of our Club by these puppets and their master. Have a good look at their faces. Still think they cared???? Unbelievable.

 

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/sandy-easdale-resigns-rangers-board-5314666

Although the BBC 'broke' the story, the screenshot was on Ranger Media well before the BBC picked it up and ran with it.

 

We should not underestimate how much some of our fan base hate the RST and anyone associated with it.

 

It's an inside job IMO, which is dreadful when we are trying to get our club back on a more positive footing.

 

But whatever the source, Rangers need to come out tell them to feck off and don't waste our time !!!

 

Je Suis Chris !!!

McNally and company were tweeting about Chris' history of online comments pretty much minutes after his appointment, it's clear which set of fans in Glasgow are responsible for this

I will be very disappointed in King and the Board if they cave into this.

Last board would hardly have been any better

People get sacked all the time for less these days, image is everything.

Him going isn't as unthinkable as many seem to think, although only Paul Murray will really know what's going to happen

Some of the facts that you adduce do seem incredible or at least worthy of furhter explanation but I am still doubtfull about it being a Machiavellian plot deliberately to discredit the RFB.

It at least treated them with contempt though

Sorry STB not sure what you mean here.

 

By transparent do mean he was obviously biased or are you trying to say he was even-handed?

Obviously bias I meant, maybe was bad wording.

The way he let a nat filled audience attack Darling in his debate with Salmond was particularly disgraceful

Sad but true that the stand out in our squad isn't our player.

James Cook- anti- Rangers, anti - British, a Nationalist and sucked Salmond's cock every day in the referendum campaign.

Both of the Easdales' positions were untenable, it's that simple. They were in bed with the enemy as far as most Rangers fans were (and are) concerned and they've been directly involved in voting through some absolutely despicable boardroom decisions which weren't in the best interests of the company or the Club.

 

Then there's their use not only of Jack Irvine, but of arseholes from Pacific Quay CSC and lawyers they instructed to threaten and take legal action against Rangers fans, websites and forums.

 

Your sympathies are beyond comprehension yet again and completely misplaced.

Believe me, I'm not lying awake at night crying with sympathy for Sandy Easdale. Let's not exaggerate a couple of internet messages

So making a decision which was obviously not in the club's best interests which was proven to be made in order to save the blazer means these two are "not badly intended" ?

 

I swear you are contrarian just for the sake of it and without even thinking through what you are saying !

I've also said that they were in too deep with people more powerful than them, try and read everything I say rather than making a headline.

Saying the Easdales came in with reasonable intentions doesn't excuse the mess that was made and I'm hardly saying they should be given a lifetime seat at the stadium, however both are gone now with minimal fuss and I'd like to think they can just get on with their lives running businesses more at their level.

Difference with the two L's is that they should be hounded forever IMO.