kuznetsov

not sure mate, that is why i am asking.

well you are now as well, green clearly stated yesterday, with quotes, he has not spoken to the player or his agents.

thats why i cleared it up at the end by saying he is possibly worth about half of what wallace is worth. "and isheaquierry is worth realistically around half of that."

was wilson in charge of our reserves when celtic reserves were doing 8 in a row? shame its not sinclair leaving.

talk of the town in annan amongst his family and friends he has signed yet green has denied he has even spoke to the lad. lol who is lying? i think we can guess.

free speech was banned in scotland when the catholics took over.

apparantly isheaquierry is worth 8m so how can wallace be the best left back and only worth 1 to 2 million? lol he is easily worth many times more than that. nearer 5 i would say. and isheaquierry is worth realistically around half of that.

his work deserves a wider audience and published by a more credible forum/website.

everton still owe £3m for jelavic, do they not? who gets that?

who else do we owe money to? each and every one of them should be paid off over time, including hmrc.

i agree 100% mate.

any opportunity to make or save a pound or two eh.

oh the irony. we can do without such unsubstantiated nonsense on our own forums thanks.

exactly, as stb says it reflects poorly on all of us because of a minorities idiotic actions. its embarassing.

comedians use sweary words to enhance jokes all the time.

would these be alright then? "would mr ashley please do one" or "mr ashley we wish no association with you"

but thats just an excuse. i dont dislike the pope because he is simply a catholic, i dont wish him to fuck off simply because he is a catholic. why this hatred for ashley from these idiots? is it because he is jewish? a cockney? an englishman? all those are discriminatory too.

puma is slightly underwhelming too but certainly better than umbro. they were maybe the inevitable choice given the links between ourselves, ashley, sports direct etc.

does nike not cover more sports though? they are very americanised and cover huge amounts of athletic sports. adidas were always a football brand who slowly diversified into our sports over time.

does nike not cover more sports though? they are very americanised and cover huge amounts of athletic sports.

good on them. i dont see how it has anything to do with us though. england and scotland will never merge leagues. nor do i want it too.

if the banner was telling the pope to fuck off people would be up on charges. why is this any different?

lol trying to talk down adidas. its the worlds number one brand for football, it is the football brand. the best of the best.

pathetic and disgusting.

no, i want adidas because its the best. simple really.