Jump to content

 

 

pmu

  • Posts

    973
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by pmu

  1. pmu

    Redundancies

    to be fair I think that's a pretty "human" reaction to someone you believe has just fucked you over.
  2. pmu

    Redundancies

    I just thought Barca was winding up FS and he took a big bite!
  3. well if you are happy as we are then that's fine rab. just keep spending your cash and shut your mouth and accept the fare being served up. Somers and Ashley will be delighted. just for your info I don't want DK making up any shortfall, I want the club to be self sufficient and well run.
  4. for me starve the fuckers out and we pick up what is left and rebuild AGAIN. would be happier with that , whatever it looks like, than this current pie of shit that we have become. pish team, disgrace of a manager, as for the people running the club, they defy description. I HATE US as we are I will take the risk that we can eventually (this could take another few years) become a great club again..as long as this lot have cash coming in they will hang on with their finger tips...
  5. you say arse from elbow but .. I am not supporting the current mob in any way but I also question kings deals. do you know what he demanded in return for his investment or loan or whatever? please enlighten me then you can call me a fool ...he is not transparent either so that's why I am calling him out on that issue.
  6. so king says it would have been able to provide immediate proof of funds (why did it not??) they would have revealed the id of the other 5 consortium members had easdale confirmed shareholder support (obviously shareholders would have wanted that info before making a decision to support the proposal) easdale was unable to provide what the consortium had asked for and there was no way forward. (what exactly did the consortium demand for the prosal on offer?) think somers is at it and find kings response unsatisfactory as it leaves questions as to whether it was a proposal that could be accepted or just asking too much for the input.. would like to question somers more on what aspects of Kennedys proposal were unacceptable. maybe 0% interest on the Ashley loan but that neatly sidesteps the fact he got the board "cleansed" to his liking with his men now in place. what price can you put on that part of the deal. all a bunch of c***s for me...
  7. pmu

    Ally's CV

    agree it's probably not the second best squad because of lack of balance etc, but it damn well should be considering the money spent on it..
  8. would be nice if he was as concerned about naming all the previous investors BPH springs to mind.... apparently King is responding later. cant help but think he has to lay everything on the table in terms of the deal he proposed. if he isn't straight up then it leaves doubts as to whether he actually proposed a deal that could be accepted..
  9. does he have an unfortunate eye blinking trigger of is he lying like a madman!!!
  10. I don't understand why some moan like f@@# about the club blaming the fans. Bearman has a point it is us the fans withholding cash the club desperately needs. It was plain to see to a blind man that boycott played into the hands of those making their power grabs with the dodgy deals being "legitimized" through their nesscesity. The alternative was to keep feeding them the cash needed to survive and risk that being bled away as previously done. To say bear man's comments are just shite is a bit simplistic when our actions as fans refusing to fund this shambles undoubtedly are partly to blame, but I'm happy to take that responsibility for my actions. My beef with the likes of that clown Houston etc is their childish non acceptance that their actions have consequences that might not feel too good in the cold light of day.. rant over. Seriously don't put me on a bus for two hours at this time of day. Just give me my car back!!!!
  11. Is this the easdale incident that is attracting the "no questions to be asked"at ibrox re saturdays game
  12. perhaps FS might have some insight into what was going on. were other board members contacted about this??? ok just saw your post FS..
  13. I agree but a behind closed door deal only leaves the same shit to be peddled again and again. an official ruling just kills it, assuming they say we are not a two year old club!!!!
  14. think it's a good thing it's going to an official ruling as that forces them to clarify this issue , hopefully, once and for all..
  15. if rangers decided not to invoke the cancelation clause then they should leave the lad to stick with Scotland for the two games.
  16. no it's not a threat just a comment that's it's a bit rich calling something pish when your own comment could be construed as same.. you came on with the aggressive stance auldie..
  17. what like the guys who challenged the easdales? or exactly how do I challenge ally publicly?? careful what you call pish my friend...
  18. think it would be same result. same old shit on the pitch and ally filling his boots with the keys to the safe... the former we don't know for sure, the latter a certainty...
  19. That it was not was a disturbing development and has set a worrying precedent. What's next? Derek Llambias ruling that Jon Daly deserves a start up front ahead of Kris Boyd? David Somers insisting the side should set up in a 4-5-1 formation instead of a 4-4-2? I sincerely hope they do.....someone needs to rattle his cage..
  20. Ah well 400 posts and t4c has finished his "microscopic examination " of all things bh related. It had the characteristics of an anal probe rather than a gentle cough and hand on the baws... With a life to go get t4c should be busy for the next few weeks. Surprised that bh didn't tell him to do one about 395 post ago....
  21. If he plays his Fucking stupid media games with Ashley he will be gone in the blink of an eye. Keep at it Ally!!!
  22. i'm thinking this fans group is heading nowhere but also feeling a wee bit sorry for BH.. I though he made a huge mistake when elected to come on here and invite all sorts of questions, issues etc and he would take it all to the meeting and demand answers.. looks like he is caught in the trap, don't answer everyones questions and he's wrong, try and answer every question and still wrong and no life!!! would have been better posting his contact email for the RFB and indicate he would only communicate rfb business in that manner. I have no idea who all the characters are in these various fans groups, but reading many posts on here recently it is becoming clearer that many of these forums are being run and visited by guys who have been involved with and fallen out with each other on various fans groups. when you see some of the accusations flying around , financial mismanagement, lying, etc you see a mirror image of Rangers! it's clear so many of these fans leaders past and present don't just mistrust each other but hate each other. I've said it before but I think we currently have the club that we deserve. Findlay was right in one respect. we have to rebuild as a new club with a new set of ideals and principles(doesn't mean we throw away our rich history). as supporters we cant change how the club is being run at present but we could have better standards as fans, but it appears our leaders are in this up to their necks..
  23. looks like those who love "committees" , "Protocols", "constitutions" blah blah fucking blah will love this.... Think this group will talk more about themselves than become an effective fans voice..
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.