Jump to content

 

 

trublusince1982

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,660

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by trublusince1982

  1. trublusince1982
    new question. if you never duck a fight then why are you moving the egm?
  2. trublusince1982
    dont knows whats funnier their talk of trust through communication followed by non answer after non answer or their belief they can still get fans on board. sick fed up of the excuse of outside influences confusing fans. Rangers fans in general ignore words and judge actions.
  3. trublusince1982
    guess it was a heated meeting?
  4. trublusince1982
    no minutes and chairman resigns, I can make up a conspiracy from that!!
  5. trublusince1982
    in english does that mean they can have below 3% with no conditions?
  6. trublusince1982
    no problems.
  7. trublusince1982
    Just for the confused board members clarity sbs.
  8. trublusince1982
    yeah thats what i am guessing. Its only a small amount though so not the worst news. just makes you wonder how many more with links to ashley and co there are in the 15%
  9. trublusince1982
    how do the numbers look now? Take it fitel were in the unknown 15%?
  10. trublusince1982
    dont think it happened either what made you think i did? the quoted was in reference to the comment about them not understanding the fans anomosity. that all being said if it did happen not that i think it did I wouldnt lose a second of sleep over it. As I have said before fight fire with fire. It in my opinion is to all our shame that the board can enter Ibrox to continue the destruction free of fear.Same goes for walking around glasgow as if they have not a care in the world.
  11. trublusince1982
    after rereading to clarify. as the analogy you use shows you are doing nothing wrong as far as society would deem it ,merely contravening a personal opinion/belief. I do not think the same can be said for KJ. If he allows his stories to be altered giving them the same slant over and over for what seems like either sensationalist monetary reaction, religious hatred or just hatred then that is wrong and unjustifiable. Its not just part of a days work or an accepted hardship from a selected profession.
  12. trublusince1982
    thats true but do they not get to decide what their name is put against?
  13. trublusince1982
    kind of like scott brown being a Rangers fan except when hes at work ,when it then becomes financially beneficial to join with the mob? not for me. There is a big difference from doing something at work that is against your own personal beliefs/intentions but which society deems acceptable ,too being paid to do which goes against societies moral level of acceptability. even if society is largely blind to what you are doing.
  14. trublusince1982
    was the pic a tweet sent to him? did he reply with child like glee and full of adoration for the club he spent many a youthful day with? or did he stay silent in the hope nobody notices?
  15. trublusince1982
    just for clarity . its because your puppet master has purposefully financially destabilised the club to maximise his negotiating position when stripping the club of its largest revenue streams while stripping our footballing infrastructure to lower costs in an effort to paper over the missing incomes that he took for free all the while hiding in the shadows using pr companies and patsy ceo's as a distraction. and breath...
  16. trublusince1982
    when he sticks it to their business partner! don't make me laugh. Was that when he refused point blank to condemn peter liewells statement after lord Nimmos ruling or when he described the carve up that's the new spfl as celtic helping out the other teams like some sort of philanthropists? Maybe it was during the motherwell born wizz kid headlines you realised he was Rangers through and through or when he referred to ebts as dodgy side deals after lord nimmos ruling or was it when he constantly reported £147m as being the mythical debt level or was it £90m? Not to mention the place of work he chooses to reside in happily putting his name to their completely biased sports department as chief sports writer. Sorry my bad for thinking a guy who happily describes Rangers as a "cancerous body" ain't one of us. Maybe he can now tell us when nerlinger will be turning up along with the director of football we are appointing while making staff redundancies? Lies ,lies and more lies in the pursuit of money makes not a Rangers man.
  17. trublusince1982
    amazed its just one truck!
  18. trublusince1982
    he played right mid each time he played for the first team and did well in the pre season friendlies from that position scoring twice if I remember right. Think nowadays its more preferred position than cast in stone.
  19. trublusince1982
    Cant believe law gets played at right mid before Gallacher.
  20. trublusince1982
    Instead of slapping them with a ban can we not just slap them? Honestly easdales we will all look the other way if you want to hang keith jackson from a bridge by the feet. I know they may be doing us a favour exposing the board etc but it just leaves me feeling dirty all over ,and not in a good way.
  21. trublusince1982
    thought he had.
  22. trublusince1982
    got to laugh,that or cry.
  23. trublusince1982
    agree with that mostly. My only worry is we need to replace law,boyd and miller, do the new recruits cover those positions?
  24. trublusince1982
    8900+5300 very good going. surprised the media are not goimg on and on about this!!lol
  25. trublusince1982
    do Arsenal not owe us a few favours?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.