Jump to content

 

 

j1mgg

  • Posts

    161
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. No one would want that scenario, especially after the D&P mess. Why hasn't an EGM been filed, it is up to the money men now, as has been previously seen, we fans, and even supporters groups have no real power.
  2. Thanks, answer a lot, especially the floating charge as I thought that was worse than security from a description from google.
  3. Can you answer any of the questions I have asked, or is this your normal reply. It is easier to digest when I have facts rather than made up rubbish, like MA wouldn't own Ibrox if we defaulted on the loan, as has been previously stated numerous times on here but still some people still peddle it, doesn't make it any easier though. As I have said, The three bears can also do the suggestion i have said.
  4. There is a few questions here Have we used Ibrox in the past as a source of funding, as I have been told Lloyd's had a floating charge, although I believe this is slightly different. MA would only have security over Ibrox, so how could he do a leaseback If we did default, even then MA wouldn't own Ibrox and it would be sold to the highest bidder. Is there anything stopping the three bears saying they will loan £12m, £6m just now to be converted to shares at a later date, and a further £6m in February to be secured against Auchemhowie? I firmly believe this will be MA ways of controlling the club, if he can't get it by buying shares he will do it by having security over everything, and going down the Newcastle way of loaning us money with no interest and long payback terms Do we know what the finer details were of both loan offers?
  5. Posted on another site Glenmuir 1.0m shares Norne Anstalt 1.2m shares Putney Holdings Ltd 700k shares Gorbon Limited 1.55m shares Asia Credit Corporation (Chris Andrew Morgan) (Rafat Rizvi) 400k shares Eurovestech Plc 600k Insight Investment Management (Global) Ltd unknown holding BPH is Hazem Nabil Houssami 4.43m shares 5.43% Margarita is BC Abela. 2.6m shares 3.19% Sandy Easdale 4.24m shares 5.21%
  6. I have read that people with 1% or more worth of shares have been asked to make themselves known. Not been able to read it all, but can only guess this will be to do with a bid. Kieron Prior has complied and just has over 1% River & Mercantile has 5.77% Hopefully more to follow and find out who has been backing who.
  7. Bringing back Ally would be a massive own goal. The hope would be that a manager has already been chosen a month ago and has been doing his work and knows straight away what he wants to do with players coming in, leaving, and such. If that isn't the case then we won't have.much change by the end of the window, maybe a few panic buys, but not enough I think to even get close to hearts, and possibly fighting for that 3 rd place.
  8. We need to move towards the future and I believe that requires no more jobs for the boys, in all positions. King needed to buy out shareholders to get his goal, and the thing about not wanting to give money to investors, the majority of investors he would be stealing from as they will of paid a lot more for the shares that what he has paid them. He will need to carry on buying out other shareholders to get a firm grip on the club as well, or he may still lose crucial polls against other shareholders.
  9. Still a lot more work to do, and although I haven't liked how he has been doing stuff in the past, he has now stumped up and bought shares. I just hope when they get directos on the board they think long and hard about who they put there.
  10. I think it would be a blessing as it would let them know where everyone stands. As you say, it wouldn't be a huge price per share, and a lot less than some people paid. I know the money won't go to the club, but getting a good majority shareholding is also important, and basically for peanuts.
  11. What shares are still available, big players BPH Margerita MA Edit MASH (Ashley) 8.9% River & Merc 7% Blue Pitch 5.4% Sandy Easdale 5.2% Margarita 3.2% Letham 4.0% Taylor 9.3% Park 6.1% King 14.6%
  12. Can anyone elaborate on this "Have just read on Twitter that as Letham, Taylor and King have previously been in a consortium together the concert party rule will come in to affect now. Which I believe means a bid for full takeover must be made." Was posted by someone else by it would be good to know if true, and the good and bad points if it is?
  13. Can anyone elaborate on this "Have just read on Twitter that as Letham, Taylor and King have previously been in a consortium together the concert party rule will come in to affect now. Which I believe means a bid for full takeover must be made." Was posted by someone else by it would be good to know if true, and the good and bad points if it is?
  14. I have an inkling that Brian Kennedy will purxhase the shares off of the rivers group, just that feeling.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.