Jump to content

 

 

TheTinMan99

  • Posts

    819
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TheTinMan99

  1. Anyone has a "legal right" to sue anyone. I, for example, could sue you for talking shite on the internet. To be fair, I have a stronger case that Ahmad:fish:
  2. More tolerance about opinions, and less tolerance about personal abuse, on all forums, would go a long way to making the divides seem less dramatic. Without appearing to kiss the admin ass on here, Gersnet seem to have the balance about right. The big two could do a lot worse than send their mod teams on here for a week for some much needed re-training.
  3. Half a million unpaid bonuses, lol. Fuck off Ahmad.
  4. The moderation of the big Rangers forums is laughable at times, for a multitude of reasons. I can imagine someone like Blin, or McColl having a cursory glance during a spare moment and thinking "fuck that". As for the fan divide, I doubt any amount of peacekeeping will bring the relevant factions together, even if most of the arguments are based on rumour and general internet bullshit. In the grand scheme of things, 99% of stuff on the internet is complete pish. When it comes to debate and chat about Rangers, I reckon the percentage is even higher.
  5. I assume this is before the brothers grim bought Green's shares , Zappa? It was Margarita holdings that I couldn't remember.
  6. Great news. Who's behind blue pitch and that other mob, whose name escapes me?
  7. In answer to Murray, nobody owns more than 10%..........
  8. How the fuck do you blow 7m at the bookies? I've had some bad days myself in there, but come on.
  9. I'm starting to think it wouldn't be a total disaster to meet them at Ibrox in the SC. To pump them as a lower league club would be something that could never be repeated.
  10. First time I've noticed he was in his 50's, I must have missed his 50th birthday thread. Hope that clears things up for you. I agree, it is a rather strange title.
  11. Sly digs about his management skills in a birthday thread, ffs. Makes you feel old seeing Ally head into his fifties.
  12. It just makes no sense to ask us to back the change, and in the next breath to say that Mather is doing a good job. The change that Mcoll and co wanted included the removal of Mather. I get the feeling that Walter's backing of Mather had more to do with Mather's backing of Ally, than actual boardroom matters.
  13. Walter's backing of Mather has been the single biggest fuck-up that the McColl camp have made. If he has gone back on this, he really should make it clear to the support.
  14. I expect the forum will be receiving a strongly worded e-mail from Rod the prods lawyers about this thread title.
  15. Why the panic to get this removed I wonder? Am I missing something explosive, apart from a random having access to private e-mails?
  16. Ah ok. A rating in the 70's doesn't seem too bad, all things considered. It seems high enough to gain some type of bank overdraft facility also, you would think. Who knows.
  17. Has that not been the case since day 1 of this new regime? We certainly had no overdraft facility, Imrans maws aside.
  18. Looks like he has just inherited whatever proxies sir charles of green was holding before he jumped ship (allegedly).
  19. Gay .
  20. Sweaty bet there at 1/2. Right round them:flute:
  21. He's got a second wind because we've dropped down the leagues. A lot of the criticism he got was justified, especially when we had to suffer him at centre mid. He was finished as a top level player about a year after we signed him. Scoring 50/60 goals while we are playing semi-pros won't change that. Saying that, he does put some of our younger players to shame with his effort and commitment.
  22. He didn't get much of a sniff to be fair to him, and he didn't look out of place when he got the odd game towards the end. He would be cheap enough, and is easily good enough to compete this year and next, but someone would have to leave first, or we will soon have enough players for 3 teams. Personally, I liked his attitude.
  23. I thought Easdale could buy greens shares earlier because Cenkos got the bullet? Hard to keep up with the amount of shite and half-truths they all spout. If this gives the Easdales a joint total of around 10%, then going by that, the support should have two board members also to represent us. I wont be holding my breath for that to happen.
  24. Spot on about Daly, the posh mans Kevin Kyle. Jig out-scoring him 3/1 from centre half. I don't get the love-in for him, although I expect I understand why he escapes much criticism. Jig up top, or not in the team for me. Give the younger ones some game time and vital experience at the back.
  25. Wow, Bill Struth, slipping standards. I think that ship of high standards sailed a long time ago. I actually think the club have handled it reasonably well, considering the available evidence against Black. There was zero evidence that he tried to influence any match he was involved in, and in fact, scuppered his own bet. I think some of us are just using this as a stick to beat a player they already dislike. I would have liked to see the reaction if it was one of our more popular players. Just to be clear, I'm in no way trying to defend Ian Black personally. He did break the rules, and wandered into what is a grey area, where the shit will probably stick to him for his whole career. For this reason he probably should be moved on, but there are better ways of doing it, than in a blaze of glory immediately after the verdict, which will only bring more negative attention to the club. The Sandaza situation was a perfect example of how we shouldn't be acting. Our players should be defended by the club under almost any circumstances, and then moved on if the CLUB feels he has crossed a line.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.