ranger_syntax
-
Posts
9,776 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
14
Everything posted by ranger_syntax
-
This was mentioned at the meeting in the Grosvenor Hotel. I think that Alex Wilson mentioned it and that Rangers should drop the dignified silence approach and challenge unfair press coverage. It was clearly not a priority though. I interpreted this as an indication that Rangers may struggle to defend itself unless in a position of strength. I happen to agree and as such I'm not disappointed. I would like the club to put its own house in order before worrying about the press.
-
I see the point you are making now. Although I think that I've been misled by the use of the term 'patterns'. That suggested to me that you were talking about something more general like the outcome of a poll.
-
Suggest you check this page. If that doesn't have the information that you are looking for then you can ask a question directly. http://www.buyrangers.org/faq/
-
We will be up against a higher quality of opposition next season. The same will be true the following season. The supporters will be willing and able to pay more to attend and Rangers should increase the price in order to maximize total revenue.
-
This is what I really wanted to know. I have taken part in the RST poll and have read the current results. What I have not done is read any statement of "Admin's position". Can you say which particular results you think are contrary to RST admin's position?
-
-
The price will be what ever share owners want to sell for. If you introduce £10m + of demand into a market of this size then I believe that you can expect a significant increase in price.
-
Apologies, I see what you are saying now and I've edited my post above.
-
I'm in favour of fan ownership and a member of the RST and BuyRangers. It's not "pie in the sky" to imagine that supporters can gradually increase their stake in Rangers while still buying season tickets. But if it is ever going to happen then we need to stop thinking that were are only customers.
-
I'm afraid I don't think that Dave King would unite fans like the o.p. hopes. The divisions that exist would remain. I think it's best just to ignore it and people who want to do something positive should get on with it. What would be better is if people could learn how to disagree, compromise and work together where common ground exists. In some ways I think that the reaction to any news about Dave King shows how little we have learned over the past few years. We still pin our hopes on a big business man coming along to save us.
-
I was discussing this after the match with my father. He is happy for the current board to remain in place and reluctant to have Paul Murray et al included. Despite this he accepted that about 60% held up cards today and that up to 10% may also have supported this protest without holding up cards. People might quibble about these figures but nobody can deny that a significant proportion of those who actually attend matches support the Sons of Struth protests. I hope Laxey Partners, and others, take note of this.
-
financial figures on PM history, taken from RM.
ranger_syntax replied to j1mgg's topic in Rangers Chat
I think that the Rangers Media position is to remain neutral and that it is some of the users that take this position. -
financial figures on PM history, taken from RM.
ranger_syntax replied to j1mgg's topic in Rangers Chat
Did the Rangers Media user provide sources for these figures? Are the list of directorships exhaustive or just cherry picking? -
The Chairman states that the previous boards have been unfit to run the club. He uses this to attack Malcolm Murray while giving Brian Stockbridge a free pass. I think this is incoherent and should give us an indication of how seriously we should take the statement.
-
I'd like to think you are right but I suspect that playing away to Dunfermline will be difficult.
-
That's true, but given our recent history I'm happy to take a chance with the other options available.
-
Point 3 is a good way to rule out many deals that will not be the best.
-
Point 3 If everything is above board then it is fine. The problem is that it is much easier to draw a line where the constitution suggests. In the absence of this safeguard we will be treated to months, or even years, of debate about our directors and the deals that club makes. Potential investors (the correct kind) may even be encouraged by a rule like this.
-
Perhaps, like the U.S.A. constitution, it could be amended under certain circumstances. For example overwhelming support among season ticket holders.
-
Are you related to a director?
-
I want most of the points on that list. I'm prepared to accept the points that I don't particularly want.
-
Scottish Cup Draw Rangers v Dunfermline or Ayr
ranger_syntax replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
I'm hoping for Ayr too since I don't want us to get a kicking more often than is absolutely necessary. -
Any constituent should be discouraged from voting for someone who acts in such a way.
-
I'm not so sure about this.
-
It's best not to worry about what website someone uses and just think about the points he makes.