Jump to content

 

 

crucible

  • Posts

    386
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by crucible

  1. It is from the fakes site and should be treated with the contempt it deserves, what I am saying is quite clear, why you are having difficulty understanding it is your problem.
  2. You are having a laugh, the proffered evidence comes from the fakes as everyone knows, FS clearly states he believes it is Pinsent Masons who is speculating, what your problem is beats me, what is a real poor show is trying to pass off fakes as support for any view.
  3. I will definitely leave it with you, work to do.
  4. Like I said I will leave it with you until you decide what you mean, whither speculating which was the word you used, or being honest or spinning or whatever you mean based on something you lifted from fakes.
  5. Best leave it with you and fakes till you decide what you mean and if as you previously claimed Pinsent Masons are spinning and to what end.
  6. They don"t because as in all dictatorships challenge is not tolerated and is silenced, even in such small and nondescript ones who infect a host.
  7. A Rangers hating source of nonsense if ever there was one no perhaps about it, what is it coming to when fakes is used as an oracle to discredit an honest inquiry and company, shameless is what it is.
  8. You did lift your supporting paragraph from the fakes ?
  9. Let me hazard a guess and say charlotte fakes.
  10. I know Pinsent Masons are a well respected company, you need to speculate that is up to you.
  11. Yes and between them Nuremberg and Jackson managed a cornucopia of unmitigated malice towards The Rangers with only one end, that to stir up and regurgitate that which had already been laid to rest by Pinsent Masons. My fervent hope is that Pinsent Masons take these haters to task for implying some sort of incompetence or worse on the part of Pinsent Masons .
  12. It would appear you didn't know or didn't want to acknowledge AJ said that, endorsing Whyte that is.
  13. No need to rewrite history when it is all there. Although Johnston said the board was split on whether the Whyte deal would get over the finishing line, he added: “The board are reflective of my view which is, if we can get this thing right, it will be good.” “I think he is a businessman who is very bright and I think he has been very strategic, historically, in how successful he has been. He has done it but keeps his cards very close to his chest. I could tell that his analysis was very enthusiastic but realistic. I would say that he is aspirational but realistic.”
  14. What are the obvious qualifications it is either of substance or it isn't, a story dumped without any thought to consequence or effect of any further action by the SFA if they are shown to have been mislead. Shameful by aj to start a subject and carried with glee by jackson and Nuremberg doesn't even begin to cover it.
  15. The scaremonger in reality gave Whyte a glowing reference stating how good he was.....until he was bagged.
  16. Why is he doing this why is he handing the biggest stick possible to our enemies, who needs enemies indeed with sensationalists like aj.
  17. You would do better to be touched by the ability of the authorities to visit the worst possible retribution upon us without an ex-chairman throwing petrol on a fire that was all but out.
  18. Perhaps and more probably it is you who should shut up. As part of a "five way agreement" between Sevco, the Rangers oldco, the Scottish FA, SPL and SFL, Green was ordered to confirm Sevco Scotland, which now trades as The Rangers Football Club Limited, had no connection with Whyte or any of his associates. Green was also asked to give an "irrevocable commitment" for the company to have no future connection with Whyte or associates in the future.
  19. Posting such and putting it in the public domain is certainly rumourmongering of the worst kind that we can well do without. Too late the car crash that is AJ has it all over the back page of the rhebel.
  20. That why I asked is just unsubstantiated rumourmongering or claimed to be fact, I for one have no hesitation in dismissing it as rumour.
  21. I would be more than very surprised that he was in any way involved, or are the people making the claims saying it is fact as opposed to rumourmongering.
  22. If people are openly saying or claiming Whyte is about and involved it is hardly hidden from anyone, I would think even the incompetent SFA scan message boards.
  23. I have read two theories today that wouldn't be out of place on timmy boards, one saying ticketus may still be involved and now this about Whyte, I always thought you couldn't make it up seems I was wrong.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.