crucible

perhaps hes been busy trying to wrest rangers from the clutches of the spivs.

What for 12 years ?

he delivered a bid greater than greens.

 

i find it weird that mccoll has to put in before he gets your respect over a guy who has taken millions out.

 

regardless you have utterly missed my point.

 

corporate governance = good

highly respected accountants at the top of their field on our board = good

forensic investigation of our money situation = good (unless your hiding something of course)

 

whats not to like?

For Murray one name covers it, Martin Currie fund Edinburgh I can't recall him having a real job since then.

Personally I would feel extremely confident about the future of our Club with McColl at the helm. One concern I have after seeing this morning's papers through is that McColl's past track record has seen him dive for cover whenever his involvement is made public e.g. he was underwriting the original supporters' bid before his cover was blown, and he declared all bets were off because his cover had been blown. I hope it's different this time.

It would appear it is he is pledging no monies according to reports.

Mather? You mean Green?

No I mean Mather.

Puts Walter and Alistair in a tight place being allies of Mather.

The man who will not be master in his own house will forever be a vassal.

Shocking deviation from the facts.

Why would we be our own worst enemy, our worst enemy is the press nothing surer. who bury celtic stories like that of their rabid vile songs against Drummer Rigsby.

If so, Rangers, like the BBC, might be their own worst enemy.

Good God they are hunting in threes now must be a commie troika as opposed to FBI, as always so totally righteous as is their dogma..

Do you always hunt in pairs here, or maybe just training as FBI profilers.

Why not, since you are the ones making the claims, back up your paranoia with some facts, rather than throwing insults at people who question its validity?

 

First of all, who is this "we" that are now the "second class majority"?

Second, in what ways exactly are we "second class"?

Thirdly, in what ways are "their" behaviours any different to "our" behaviours?

 

And as a sidenote, the level of casual and gratuitous offensiveness of crucible's posts puts me in mind of 'reaper' - sock puppet perchance?

Thanks for your input always the language of the defeatist to deflect on to something else, you really should develop a thicker skin for the internet and to claim I am someone else whom you also appear to have a dislike for or problem with just reinforces your lack of perception as to our standing in the bigger picture.

One thing we were was saved from was oblivion.

People should vent their anger at someone else than fellow Bears not of their opinion.

Andy Steel should take your advice.

I've no intention of entering into any sort of 'debate' with the stupidity on show here.

The stupidity is your quiet dignity and let them kick the shit out of us again and again, your attitude is nothing short of a disgrace as is your replies to people willing to stand up for our club and our heritage.

The level of fantasy and imagined oppression in this thread is worthy of a celtc board.

What a sad statement of appeasement.

They will vote for their own in any political party they think will win power. They historically all voted for the Scottish Unionist Labour Party(due to their dominance in Scotland) despite all being rabid Irish nationalists every saturday afternoon at 3pm onwards. A very strange mix I'd have thought: Scottish unionist/Irish nationalist.

The truth is there's no political party for non-catholic unionists in Scotland. The labour party is over-run by them, the Tories are for the toffs & the Lib-dems are, well, just the Lib-dems.

Also they are bold and do not hide their Sellik allegiance whereas Rangers people in politics/media seem reluctant to reveal theirs. I find this extremely worrying. It seems to me to be an attempt to make Rangers to be some sort of 'toxic brand' .

I could go on and on about their 'club for all' nonsense but I won't.....................

One only has to think of Dr Death sex pest who taught galloway the iranaway song book at Stirling uni, The Bruce would have been birlin' at the very thought.

yet he signed the forms that signed them on.

 

and of course by your own admission he said whyte was sevco5088.

 

but really it's the millions of club funds hes been paid that worry me.

You were and are quite clearly wrong I will leave it at that.

They have taken over the power base in the WoS and most definitely in Glasgow, why anyone from our side votes them in defeats me.

Rangers released a statement in response to STV's story concerning documents lodged with Companies House that suggest Charles Green signed on Craig Whyte as a director of Sevco 5088 Limited.

Here is the club's statement, in response to Friday's story, produced in full:

Following the publication and broadcast of misleading and inaccurate information on STV this evening, a spokesman for Charles Green said: "Mr Green is appalled by this blatant attempt to discredit him. These documents are not correct or valid and he did not sign Craig Whyte or his associate on as directors of Sevco 5088.

"Mr Green was the sole director of Sevco 5088 until he resigned and became the founder director of Sevco Scotland, formed by Scottish solicitors.

i never said it either.

 

but he did sign whyte and his pal on as directors and he did say you are sevco. later clarifying that he meant sevco 5088. a fact even you agree with.

He catagorically stated he never signed Whyte or his pal to anything, why are you making things up strange behaviour indeed.

your contradicting yourself now.

I think you are reading what you believe to be there rather than what is there, he never said Whyte owned anything you appear to be deliberately obtuse on this point.

yeah and that takes us back to my point.

 

he said whyte was sevco5088. then signed a deal to deliver us to sevco 5088 which only failed because hmrc rejected it.

He never said Whyte owned anything, which is the facts bare and simple.

When the decision is reversed the press will have a field day and make it something to do with us.

Why would it be reversed, two highly qualified legal people tax being their bag disagreed with a person without legal qualifications, I know what appeal decision my money is on.

We pay ? we pay who/what? this taxcase no longer has anything to do with us.

It has absolutely nothing to do with us, it is now BDO and Murray's problem.

Yes he did...Twice. Firstly to Whyte himself on tape and then once more in THAT STV interview.

He didn't he said, you are sevco 5088 which as we know is and was nothing.