Jump to content

 

 

crucible

  • Posts

    386
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by crucible

  1. I would suspect any vote should be null and void under present circumstances or at the very least until resolved.
  2. I would hazard MD is singled out as the allegations are said to be against him, on reflection the RST would have been better as first thought to keep their own counsel rather than issue a statement so weak as to be useless.
  3. I was of a mind that the RST should keep their own counsel but now that is clearly a boat that has sailed, irrespective of anyone's politics this is the last distraction we need in the run up to the AGM.
  4. Washing dirty linen in public never benefits anyone other than the spectators the RST should keep its own counsel.
  5. Why deary me, he doesn't know what he wants by dint of his abstaining approach, he would be better in the house.
  6. He if he exists doesn't need a lawyer. http://www.rangersinternationalfootballclub.com/share-information
  7. BS allegedly returns a bonus and is rewarded with removal , that makes a lot of sense. Laxey say they back him I recall.
  8. If I am reading this correctly he is against BS and Easdale but abstaining on everything else, no wonder the financial sector is a wreck with genius like this.
  9. Same guy as this, http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/rangers-latest-kieran-prior-wont-2164059
  10. We already know the answer their actions like it or not are legal, why the piss poor media constantly regurgitate drivel is anyone's guess, having said that they do keep sources and high powered in a job. The irony is apparently lost on the articles author.
  11. You would know this for a fact ? I see wisely it is now alleged which is bad enough as opposed to definite criminal activity, what are your grounds for alleging anything at all, do you have evidence or purely nothing more than dislike of the individual whom you and others are only to ready to smear.
  12. I don't have to they have no jurisdiction in Scotland,, can you enlarge on this mythical complaint the one the club or anyone else has heard of from your favourite or any other prosecution agency preferably with jurisdiction. .
  13. They don't and they didn't not being a police body, they direct people to the point of entry to register any complaint, you still seem rather peeved about the SFO nonsense maybe you have some definitive information about a complaint no one has heard of.
  14. Why don't you ask him where he is claiming criminality has taken place for he is claiming stealing has taken place, do you think he could tell you ?
  15. If you have evidence of theft a criminal act report it to the relevant prosecuting authority, but not the SFO they have no remit here as you have surely finally realised.
  16. You haven't made anything clear, I really don't think you understand what constitutes a boycott, as opposed to some people protesting.
  17. Do you really know what you want, you seem to change tack like a drifting ship. Do they get time or don't they or is mayhem your preferred option if the vote goes against.
  18. Easily, one used to be in the Ibrox boardroom and now isn't, the other is and will be for a long time.
  19. No, it's quite simple when you compare as you like to do what one is and one isn't, but you must use the correct criteria.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.