crucible

Well you keep believing that if it makes you feel better.

 

But best not to read the parts under

 

"Why is this topic important"

 

and

 

"Who can help me in Scotland"

 

The very fact it emphasises the need for liaison with Crown Office' date=' Local Police Forces should tell you all you need to know.[/quote']

 

I wouldn't waste your time.

why are we entertaining this notion the sfo have no jurisdiction in Scotland. serious frauds committed in Scotland are to be reported to them for action. they then deal with the procurator fiscal as required.

 

going to the sfo is entirely the correct course of action.

 

why are people falling for this cop out from stockbridge?

What utter nonsense.

Scotland does not have bodies similar to the

Serious Fraud Office (SFO) or the City of

London Police Economic Crime Directorate

(which acts as the lead force for fraud in

England and Wales).

However, serious and

complex frauds are investigated under the

direction of the Crown Office’s Economic

Crime Unit, which is part of the Serious

Organised Crime Division.

Our IPO costs weren't 5% or anywhere close. They weren't 12.5% or anywhere close. They were approximately 25% so let's stick to the facts.

Yes let's stick to the facts, they weren't 25%.

Their pals, Aberdeen.

 

Kinda hope we lose to deny SPL sides any money. Weird.

Jeezo

What a strange justification of a spurious allegation, as you have already been informed the SFO has no remit in Scotland and can act only by invitation, IPO's as you also have been informed are nowhere near as low as McColl claimed his 5% might just cover insurances and a lot nearer 12.5%, the fact that you in your belligerent way dismiss anything that doesn't suit is well exposed here.

Green did contact an investor a week past on Friday.

Do we have this investors name or the colour of the door that Green allegedly knocked on, no I don't think so and am not in the least surprised at the lack of any corroboration.

If Green in the last 10 days has visited shareholders asking them to vote for the board then he is pulling strings imo.

So along with others you are speculating.

It's not just Leggo who has been talking about threatsand intimidation and given the reputation of some of the peioplke now involved in Rangers.......

But Leggo is the one subject to inquiries, or do you see him as a special case who should be exempt from criticism for his foolish action ?

I don't have a tape of the conversation if that is what you mean.

No what I mean is do you have any concrete evidence, if so can you or others corroborate this conversation for all Rangers fans.

So you don't deny that people involved with the requisitioners have been threatened?

I can't deny that which I have no knowledge of until it is confirmed or not, I also don't deny that Leggo is subject to an ongoing investigation by police where he identified a fan in his blog who has since been along with his wife subject to menacing phone calls.

I believe Leggo is involved in an ongoing case where he printed the identity of a Rangers fan who subsequently received threats as did his wife, the correct procedure was followed and the victim reported matters to the Police who are investigating Leggo's part in the the matter.

Perhaps Leggo who is alleging he is aware of a similar crime should report it to the Police as should the others allegedly present at this secret meeting, it is after all their public duty to all Rangers fans and the public in general to do so in the interests of justice.

Sandy Easdale to Dave King - 'I'd shake your hand right now and have you on the Board but I can't'. Why not?

Probably because there is no evidence that was ever said, a bit like the ramblings of leggo today.

I'm not sure Frankie, perhaps keeping his options open?

I take it you have irrefutable evidence of this event actually happening and are willing to share it with all ?

Any of these dozen or so others willing to verify Leggo's account of this meeting, can anyone say who invited Leggo and why ?

Probably because there is no evidence that was ever said, a bit like the ramblings of leggo today.

I would like the Easdales removed as they are working to the instructions of others who do not have Rangers best interests at heart.

Can you enlarge on this latest conspiracy theory, might help matters all round if you took McColl's lead.

Parallels as to what happened to our club and it's supporters in a sporting sense, also what's happening to us in Scotland politically and through the Mhedia and BBC.

What is and has happened is a result of apathy and indifference in every sphere of life, if you don't stand for your beliefs and principles you end up trodden underfoot and left with the dregs, no excuses.

That's true, but it still doesn't excuse their banner. 'Poor taste' just doesn't even come close.

The British establishment excused it, they are in the Palace of Westminster, acquiescence and appeasement have their own prices ones I would rather not pay, but the powers that be have me pissin in the wind a second class inhabitant in my own land.

Yes, some people have no idea of the real world when giving is all one sided and the proverbial inch is in reality a mile.

Today's terrorist tomorrow's statesman, look no further than Adams and McGuinness, the way it has been since time immemorial.

It has all gone rather pear shaped for the requisitioners, perhaps they shall conjure a miracle on the 19th though I wouldn't lay odds on it.

McColl saying he regretted getting so involved is surely the coup de grace.

And I'm under the impression you are regurgitating Irvine's shite. As I say, all about opinions.

Democracy what a pleasant dream, still you can regurgitate unfounded and comedical requisitioner scripts to your heart's content, that's not an opinion nor an impression.

It's all about opinions but frankly having Irvine's regurgitated shite on here makes me feel queasy.

I was under the impression this thread was about a requisitioners statement, flawed as it is.

I will leave you to your diet of doom and gloom you appear to enjoy it along with your nonsense of being conned. I also read the following from a chap whose figures you were going to supply here and prove wrong gunslinger, you say he contradicted himself over PM and debt levels.

read me because it would seem your getting lazy

What is there to read, the SFO cannot operate in Scotland without the permission of the Lord Advocate/Crown Office they are impotent otherwise.

Disturbingly there are those who pray for any such damaging stories about club officials or the club to be true.

It is now clear that the SFO is not a police department and has no remit in Scotland, which makes the claim in the statement all the more strange.

http://www.sfo.gov.uk/about-us/who-we-are.aspx