Jump to content

 

 

buster.

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    14,439

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    113

 Content Type 

Everything posted by buster.

  1. buster.
    Naw, he's chief middleman and scout of our extensive youth scouting in Asia. Apparently Chan Fook Minger covers some games for him, last one being....... ..............Orlit 400k - 600K Novaresources It's obvious that the heid yins should be taking time out to prioritise youth team matters in Asia when there are some pressing financial matters to sort out regards the club's survival.
  2. buster.
    Sounds as though he'd fit right in at Ibrox.
  3. buster.
    The Rangers board are 'Raising the Bar' wrt blatantly ripping the Colin Nish out of the support. They are laughing at us..........and counting the cash.
  4. buster.
    I covered part of an answer to your post in my previous on this thread. It's life in general, you seperate the wheat from the chaff. Online posters can quickly gain a reputation in this area whether it be positive or negative. I think it's often wise to keep an open mind and listen to various sources of information. Thereafter you can decide where is the most reliable stuff coming from and how it may or may not connect with others on various sides of various divides. That along with anything you may learn along the way yourself. The most difficult thing throughout has been to put the jigsaw together in a timely fashion. When you look back at what some were saying, presenting or posting then the failure has been at the intrepretation stage by 'consumers', or not being able to put together a very complicated jigsaw. What is gone is gone. Looking forward, I think it generally wise not to dismiss so readily reasonably credible info put out there and instead look to see how it may effect the ongoing picture.
  5. buster.
    Maybe we could bring in the CIA and a secret flight to Indonesia, rendition style. That or a Bear with a slow boat to Asia !! Helping put criminals where they should be. Disclaimer: the above is not a 'serious post'.
  6. buster.
    I think someone is simply putting out there what he is hearing on the grapevine. I heard some time ago from a man who I've had good info from in the past that DM was sniffing around. That may or may not have been true as it wasn't first or second hand. If it was true that doesn't mean that it will happen or indeed that such 'sniffing' is actually serious. Personally, I can't see DM getting involved again due to various factors, including our financial prospects not reconciling with his MO/ego. Going back to the 'credibility' issue you brought up. I think it wise to listen to people like BB and instead of adopting a black or white verdict, take each piece of info on it's merits, remember it and maybe one day you'll find that it progresses the 'jigsaw'. I don't think unconstructive dismissal of what X, Y or Z comes forward with is a good idea. It's better to get into constructive dialogue if possible and encourage communication between those who may be thinking about sharing something.
  7. buster.
    It has been an on and off affair. He covered (first with it IIRC) the invisible Green consortium 8M investment story from back in June this year.
  8. buster.
    I will resist the temptation to 'return fire' regards hypocrisy in the interests of the (bigger) picture that seems to be becoming clearer. The danger is that once the fog starts to lift, there is a change and another pea-souper comes down. ie. another stage in an ongoing process (eg. post AGM December 2013) The sp.ivs with executive control, have always been able to stay at least a step ahead. You can be sure that with the upcoming events.... accounts, AGM, changes in board etc that they will have contingencies in place to maximise benefits. As time goes on, more and more fans begin to see through the charade or ongoing 'robbery'. The UoF statement from last night was as direct as anything I've seen put out there to the masses, regards detail and pointing fingers. This statement to a degree addresses what Frankie asks for in the second post in this thread. I'd implore that fans read the statement, take it on it's merits and not think about the messenger. It perhaps needs a follow-up when Rizvi can be added to the Toxic mix.
  9. buster.
    Very much so and more.
  10. buster.
    The political landscape was shaped by DM and Irvine years ago and thereafter nutured. They dug trenches and divided.
  11. buster.
    Not being able to prove X, Y or Z and lawyers letters is often the reason that it stays in the background. Sometimes it's wiser because a fluid situation can also mean what is relevant one day might not be the next. This can have the effect of 'online derision' (if done via forum) or 'ongoing dismissal' of anything X was to put forward in the future. On occasion it's been for the ongoing solvency of the company/club although I believe this was perhaps short sighted. On occasion I think it may have been because of 'interests'. On occasion the politics meant it better to hold cards close to the chest. On occasion it is a 'trump card' of sorts that can be used against a certain sp.iv. However on many occasions I agree with you and think it would be better out there so as to give supporters a rounder picture of ongoing events.
  12. buster.
    That or that a loan would be made available.
  13. buster.
    I'll stop regards debating the FF thread link I posted and leave people to read it if they wish. [unreasonable comment Edited by Frankie] I'm independent in these matters regards 'groups' and only seek what is best for the football club. I don't seek division, just a rounded discussion before an election (which is a sham but seems to be happening) I have also discovered in the last few years that I have a nose that has a knack of being able to detect and determine between truth, bullshit/spin. Too often my 'spidery senses' tell me that that AH as B.Hemdani is either not as intuitive as he is clever or is being 'political' regards his interpretations of ongoing events. AH states the following in his campaign literature "My main qualities have been described as financial skills, probity and eye for detail.” I realise that I might be wrong but I back what I said up about AH with his 'unqualified blindness' when it came to Charles Green. How can a man with the CV and relevant experience presented not have sniffed a rat with how CG went about his business, the wording and clauses of the IPO prospectus etc ?.................For me this just doesn't reconcile, whatever way you present the 'figures'. So personally,I wouldn't like to see a man who is indirect and 'political' regards answering difficult questions, has a tendency to defend the board and whose judgement of the same has been shown to be very poor over a long and vital period. If there is to be a fansboard, then it is my contention that at this moment in our history we would be better served by the Billy Patersons of this world and those who follow such a line (investigative but fair sceptics) even if not all were quite at the 'level' of BP. I'll end there and get back to the more immediate and important issues facing the club. There seems to be another convicted fraudster confirmed graphically to be involved with the Dsyfunctional Lying Circus......but then we knew he was in conversations with Green&Co over 2 years ago. I wonder what Deloittes make of it ?
  14. buster.
    I don't look for favours, nor am I up for election. Nor do I know after a fair while spent on FF, which are 'ghost accounts' on FF as you seem to. You are right in that I do see the fansboard as a sham but it does seem to be happening and I would prefer that Alan Harris wasn't elected for personal reasons previously detailed in thie thread that go beyond what is contained in the FF thread. This isn't about me though, so you can drop the stuff directed towards me. You'll note that I didn't post in the FF thread, unless perhaps you know of "ghost accounts" I have, that I am unaware of.
  15. buster.
    http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/02/19/hong-kong-grants-request-bank-century-asset-recovery.html
  16. buster.
    Between them, they must have had 'a few coins stuffed in the sofa' over the years. I'm afraid this is what Rangers is all about now and if we can't find a way to get them out the door, the club will continue to fade away on a diet of empty spin and onerous contracts.
  17. buster.
    That is your opinion and you are welcome to it. I will say that if you stand for an election, you can't pick and choose the information that may come out. Nor was the thread linked originated with this election in mind, as it was from 2 years ago. [unreasonable comment Edited by Frankie]
  18. buster.
    Perhaps they need to hire Jack Irvine to get them 'up to the levels' of the Easdales.
  19. buster.
    As I said, a long thread.............. that contained varied material that I consider relevant to the candidates suitability. If you disagree, fine. [unreasonable comment Edited by Frankie]
  20. buster.
    Heavy and very direct 'blow' landed by UoF/SoS.
  21. buster.
    I think you'll find in what is a long thread that there are posters with "inside knowledge" as you call it. There are many others without whose opinion isn't based on direct knowledge but I've already said that there is subjective opinion within content. If people are able and choose to read the thread, they can decide for themselves. Just as those that can vote, can decide who they want to vote for. One thing I would say is that there may be a natural inclination amongst some to champion a candidate from Gersnet. I can understand why this may be but that it is not reason enough to stop the flow of relevant information on a candidate. If it were of an irrelevant nature then I wouldn't have posted the link. [unreasonable comments Edited by Frankie]
  22. buster.
    When you put yourself forward for election then it is legitimate for any relevant background info that there may be out there to be put forward. The opinions, some not kind, can be disregarded as subjective. [unreasonable comment Edited by Frankie]
  23. buster.
    A thread with some background and opinion to one of the candidates (Mr.Harris) has been 'bumped' from a couple of years ago on FF. For anyone interested, the link can be found on FF. [Edited by Frankie to remove direct link]
  24. buster.
    The last correction was regards the annoucement re 'Open Offer'. http://rangers.g3dhosting.com/regulatory_news_article/387 Coincidently it was the only annoucement of the last couple of months to have the name of Paul Tyrell beside that of GW.
  25. buster.
    Over a long period 'supposed corporate goverence', wordplay, incompetence and bullshit at RIFC have interacted and produced a pea-souper of a fog that you are supposed to get tired of trying to work-out. Instead they propose you vote for plastic engagement and continue or return to handing over the Blue Pound. And that was before today. I'm simply not sure of the situation re.Ahmad and will have to presume that funds are arrested or that his right to so do is still in place until told otherwise.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.