Jump to content

 

 

buster.

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    14,229

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    111

 Content Type 

Everything posted by buster.

  1. buster.
    I don't know if they will or indeed are in a position to do so. If the executive board were serious about changing and developing the football operation as per the Business Review (April 2014), ...... and the finances, as Mr.Wallace told us were in a robust state, ........and we could trust the executive board to do the right thing by the football club then......... maybe now would be the moment. But because we are an Omnishambles at all levels with no money and varying motivations...........then it's all up in the air.
  2. buster.
    It's been evident for some time that Ally McCoist hasn't got what it takes to be a football manager and has played on the 'credit' built up over previous stages in his times with Rangers and via excuses on the spi.v shambles. He's well past the point when he has sufficient 'credit' left to makes fans blind to reallity or have realistic excuses from the ongoing dysfunctional boardroom flying circus. He should have left after last season as the above was more than apparent but he chose to stay. It will now probably get ugly as i'd be surprised if he doesn't dig his feet in and doubtful if the board have sufficient funds to terminate his contract (including any deferrals). Just another chapter in our Multi-Layered Omnishambles, that would seem to be reaching another head in 2014/15.
  3. buster.
    The Omnishambes FC nightmare is recurring. We had Green show his face again and now McCoist again showing why he's possibly the worst manager in Scottish professional football...............earning the biggest salary.
  4. buster.
    IMO he's not a moron, he's conciously and greedily promoting his own spinning profile and cuddling up to Jack. IMO he's a 'Jeremy Hunt'.
  5. buster.
    Are you playing 'Charles Green Tactics' Bingo ?
  6. buster.
    Maybe he's been in the type of bother (convictions perhaps) that is utterly indefensible in any 'decent society'.
  7. buster.
    That blog really is stretching it so far beyond credibility that it is probably is up there with the 50M Blue Pitch investment piece as the smelliest and most toxic pile of shite he has typed. I reckon McMurder must be sub-contracted via Irvine (MH). If you notice he is always batting for the Irvine backed sp.ivs / in their interests. eg. BPH, Easdales, Green........ Which by the way brings up the question of the Easdales and Bill's use of 80M offers for McGills........bullshit Easdales considerable wealth to be used at Ibrox in a major way............................................... ....................bullshit Not to forget that Green does have previous for the use of "10M"......Ally's transfer War Chest............bullshit Or his partner Stockbridge and the 100M turnover coming at the club soon.............................................b ullshit Of course for those that think Bill is a soothsayer, you can always tap into his Financial Abundance Preaching where you can send him money and he will preach his gospel. I notice his offer has been modified, see link.... http://www.freewebs.com/billmcmurdo2/partners.htm Strange why Bill doesn't suggest to The Easdales that they get involved in his Financial Abundance scheme and get Bill's "daily prayer support".....then with all the dosh produced solve the club's problems. Generally speaking, some have been known to say Financial Abundance preaching is a bit of a scam. .
  8. buster.
    .....................................................double podst
  9. buster.
    Bullshit and Bluff from Charles
  10. buster.
    Read your piece over again. It does come over in that way, regardless if it is or isn't.
  11. buster.
    Almost sounds like electioneering It certainlly doesn't address the real issues of today.......................You have to walk before you run. As for the line on supposed "PR", you either don't get it or don't want to.
  12. buster.
    I wouldn't watch Dirty Dancing or Top Gun for nothing, never mind 24 notes. High margins and Low Quality.....................perhaps they could open the food kiosks to extend a similar type offer.
  13. buster.
    Your answer is very illustrative of our ongoing situation. Not only that but I think you may be talking about the short-priced favourite.
  14. buster.
    Obvious bullshit but........... Who do you think or guess was responsible for giving this line (Green/new investor) to Radio Clyde/Media ?
  15. buster.
    More probable that his agent couldn't find him another deal that was better than his current contract and/or the club weren't able to find him a club/deal (via agents). He may or may not have turned lesser offers down and the club doesn't want to/ isn't in the position to offer an inducement of sufficient size to push it through and is playing hardball ................telling him to get his arse to Auchenhowie. Visa story smells of bullshit.
  16. buster.
    If the boardroom, their mysterious backers, changing narratives, the poor corporate goverence, the police investigations, unpaid Wonga style loans, spin-doctors fantasy bullshit, plastic communication & engagement with the fans, many of whom are fed-up with fog, bullshit and shennanigans and refuse to fund in part onerous contracts, 120 day business reviews that can't be acted upon and fail to find the likes of the 'Stockbridge share option'...........etc. ............... aren't the major concern..........what is ?
  17. buster.
    Many are already overweight on their feeding and have their offspring nibbling away in the background. You saw Green as good,........ does that mean the vultures you see now are different ? Here is a link on Ornithology to help you. http://www.ornithology.com/
  18. buster.
    But this can't be, our bullshitting blogger, 'Merlin the Spinning Fantasist' told us that our mysterious friends at Blue Pitch intend to invest up to 50M pounds sterling but only when we reach the CL. In a similar vein, I today pledged 150M Euros to Dukla Pumpherston when they win their second UEFA Champions League.
  19. buster.
    IIRC it was a draft that gave a good idea of the flavour but not the final document. If the VB do have this document, I wonder how they came by it and why it was given to them ?
  20. buster.
    Nowt wrong then, it's only the bad ole BBC spinning a line.
  21. buster.
    From the Business Review....25/04/14 "In order to achieve the strategy identified below, the Company will need to raise capital. The Board has determined that over the next three years it expects to raise between £20 million and £30 million to be invested in the Club. The Board will consider the most appropriate source of finance which may be available to the Club including equity and other sources in order to obtain the necessary funding whilst also seeking to ensure the Club’s financial stability is protected.............. ......The authority given to the Board at the AGM in December 2013 to enable the Company to allot up to 43,400,000 new ordinary shares of 1p each in the capital of the Company on a pre-emptive basis to existing shareholders has not been exercised to date. In the event that season ticket sales over the forthcoming weeks are materially less than anticipated then the Company may seek to use this pre-emptive authority which can offer a cost effective and efficient method of raising capital. To implement the initial phase of the three year plan set out below, the Board intends to seek shareholder approval in Autumn 2014 for the issue of additional equity pursuant to Section 551 of the Companies Act 2006." http://www.rangers.co.uk/images/staticcontent/documents/RangersBusinessReview.pdf ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ So how many of the 43.4M shares (less the Stockbridge slice / 120 days obviously not enough to find out about the BS clause) equate to 5M Euros ? If the board are struggling to convince investors over 5M, do they realistically hope to achieve stated objectives ? Graham 'Empty Corporate Speak' Wallace still talking about robust finances ? Other directors still talking about pushing buttons for XM ? Certain Bloggers still on about 50M from BPH ?
  22. buster.
    Whilst we know of the in part co-ordinated efforts of some of the characters you mention, it would be unwise to ignore or even dismiss everything that comes from them. The past tells us that to concentrate metaphorical 'fire' on the messenger and brush the message aside hasn't served us well. At the same time, neither do you have to believe everything they say or enjoy the tone in which it is written. It's more about using a filter of sorts. That said, perhaps there is an interesting article to be written about some of the messengers associated with Greenslade and their seemingly co-ordinated approach to matters Rangers........with a second part that covers the RTC blog, how it developed and how some of the messengers & associates were involved.
  23. buster.
    Not so much sinister but a process, after nuturing a past seed planted, very well marshalled and managed using ongoing circumstances and the Fourth estate to your advantage. Once the emotional investment is made and moreso if you can tie in an angle that involves Celtic, then you've hooked someone who will blindly follow the line until in this case, Feburary 2012. I'll give you 'sinister process' They ain't called the 'dark arts' for nothing
  24. buster.
    The worry is that it is an ever increasing trend due to it's effectiveness (if done well). eg. Accountability is becoming old hat, why resign when you can call up the spin-doctor to counter-attack. PR people like Irvine are considered successfull but essentially they are often advising on how to best mislead and lie for those who take advantage of average punters.
  25. buster.
    The heavy use of spin at Ibrox goes back to SDM bringing Jack Irvine in. As you know, spin isn't only about X on any particular day. It's also about mind-sets that are cultivated overtime and in our case, the push to confuse and divide....making life much easier for those upstairs. The above was one of the main reasons why our support not only swallowed initial reports on CW (understandable) but continued to lap up the bullshit and defend someone that could easily be shown to be 'dodgy'. He even had largely unstinting support after the Ticketus articles and the BBC programme on his directorship ban. Then it all started again with Green&Co. Not having an "Open Mind" was in good part down to years of spin and a cultivation of a mind-set, using the ongoing circumstances to your advantage. Not forgetting the Fourth Estates willingness to co-operate.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.