buster.
-
Posts
13,511 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
95
Everything posted by buster.
-
Aye, who or what mechamism would determine price ?
-
I think it means more shares (currently in reserve so to speak) being sold on the market or rather offered to existing shareholders. Forlan can possibly tidy up detail.
-
They both hit the 'jackpot' !
-
But meanwhile they enjoy the sound of the ST tills clicking (No credit cards).
-
Wasn't his job title COO (operating officer) and mostly to do with finance.
-
.................as you keep bending over.
-
Alasdair Lamont @BBCAlLamont 8 min To clarify, Mr Summers meant inst. inv would take up pre-emptive equity release rather than provide loans.
-
.......................................
-
Interesting turn of phrase.
-
Curious figures to be "satisfactory" GW arrival............... 42p Day of Review.........21p Has "rebounded" to 22p
-
It's all consuming moveable feast that has seen much cash move out the door and most of the board looking like they should cut down on the feasting.
-
Have you been writing the statement of Mr.Nash or/and have you found SDM's lost 'waiting list' ?
-
Will the judge be impressed with spin ??
-
You'd think Rangers were inviting an arrestment by saying there was presently enough money to remain solvent even with the 620K arrested without apparently making a forceful and convincing argument why given circumstances that they think they will have enough funds to see the club through the season ?
-
I take it of the money alreay in the coffers. part will be used to pay back the short-term loans as per contracts.
-
Al Lamont just happened to be in place that morning with camera to doorstep an unusually forthcoming and willing interviewee in Mr.A.Easdale. His interview was both worrying and contradictory wityh what GW was to say. A.Easdale is director of TRFC, not RIFC. ps. Is Jack Irvine still working for the Easdales ?
-
Is Somers a lawyer to trade ? Perhaps he'll use the 'aparthied' defence !
-
Between the two we should get a fairly comprehensive lowdown. It'll be interesting to see what level of detail (actual numbers) the defence (Rangers) are required to show to justify their argument. If the club say there is loads of dosh and Ahmad doesn't have to worry, then they'll have to present the numbers. If the club say that freezing 500K would tip the club into a dark place where no-one wins, then it rather contradicts what they have recently been claiming.
-
That is the word on the street and I have no reason not to believe it. I talked about a secondary source because I thought it a sensible precaution rather than any certainty of ALamont omiting detail or slanting his report a certain way. When it comes to matters Rangers, it very much looks as if McLaughlin and Lamont have had the same 'Ibrox Insiders' and both reporters have shown a willingness to go that 'extra mile' in exchange for ongoing info (which has proved to be part spin). Today is different in that 'news' should be coming from a primary source.
-
What do they say about modern preachers, interests, money and spin ? Perhaps Mr.D has been attending sermons !!
-
For when it begins, although I'd recomend finding a secondary source to check full details have been reported in a reasonably even-handed manner. Chris McLaughlin @BBCchrismclaug 1 h .@BBCAlLamont in court today for Imran Ahmad v #Rangers. Follow him for all the latest.
-
Heard it all before and we know where it went. Fool me once,................................shame on you. Fool me twice,...............................shame on me. Fool me yet again........................?
-
We're at the World Cup ... well, Peralta is!
buster. replied to der Berliner's topic in Rangers Chat
Well Costa is now taken so Costly it is !! -
There is a limit to the detail provided in audited accounts. What you desribe given circumstances is blind loyalty to a dangerous degree. This comes with precedents that broadly say same people making same mistakes. I say that after pointing that out to many on several occasions (CW, CG etc) and up until this point always being proved correct. I appreciate there will be different opinions but in our case and after recent years and who are still in and around the board (including Easdale proxies), to back those who refuse to give meaningful transparency and engagement is frankly 'strange'.
-
As it stands I don't think many realise the state of play regarding the extent of cutbacks/new income required, to start breaking even.