Rangersitis

It seems so much more professional.

Mostly, but still think that signing Eustace is a daft move.

Three year deal with an option for a fourth.

 

Signed

It's good to see that each player appears to have been assessed individually and handed a length of contract based upon that.

Manchester City have the restrictions lifted concerning their transfer spending and CL squad size.

If this guy has concrete evidence of anything, why doesn't he post it and be done?

Secondly, if those were the future plans, they certainly won't be now and everything above which may / may not be true will never be verified. Clever, that.

To be fair, Stephen Kerr was involved with Rangers for many years before Traynor was brought in so he does have a decent understanding of such issues.

 

Does this mean he agreed with SDM/Bain's media policy or prefers Traynor's more direct approach? I'm not sure but I'd like to think both men understand our opinion on the media.

 

I guess how effective they'll be will depend entirely on just how hands on the likes of King and Roberston want to be when it comes to PR.

PR is one thing, controlling media contacts in order to dupe the fans is another thing altogether. Being associated with SDM isn't something which I would regard as a positive. A bit of straight-talking from the Board may shock those sensitive souls within today's society in to giving themselves a shake.

Yet more excellent stuff from the Guardian Sport team.

Arsenal

 

Arsène Wenger is the lord of the kingdom he has built over the past 19 years. His influence extends into every pore of the club and where transfers are concerned, the manager’s authority is total. Wenger always has the final say. The board have attempted to put support systems in place around him, such as their purchase of StatDNA, the football data analytics company, which can help to identify potential signings. But Wenger continues to rely on his own eyes, together with those of his scouts. Dick Law is the club’s chief negotiator. DH

 

Aston Villa

 

The club have created an informal committee to oversee transfers that includes Tom Fox, the chief executive, Patrick Reilly, the director of recruitment, Sharon Barnhurst, the club secretary, and Tim Sherwood, the manager. With the backing of Randy Lerner, Villa’s owner, Fox gets the financial framework of any transfer deal approved but is not involved in negotiating with the agent, which he leaves to Barnhurst and Reilly. Sherwood is not keen on working within a continental structure – Villa never filled the director of football operations position that was advertised at the start of the year – and likes full control of transfers. SJ

 

Bournemouth

 

Having risen through the divisions at a tremendous pace, Bournemouth’s scouting department is still growing, with their recruitment overseen by the club’s legendary former striker, Steve Fletcher. It is down to the recruitment team to identify signings for the manager Eddie Howe, who has the final say on transfers. Howe also picks out players and Bournemouth’s approach is not to target the most obvious ones, but those who can fit neatly into their attractive style of play. That means they will not necessarily sign the best player in a league, preferring to think outside the box. JS

 

Chelsea

 

Chelsea boast an extensive network of scouts, at home and abroad, but first-team recruitment still relies heavily on input from the manager, José Mourinho, and the technical director, Michael Emenalo. They will target positions that need strengthening in the first-team and identify potential recruits, and then liaise with each other to compile a list of names to be submitted to the hierarchy. The owner, Roman Abramovich, has the ultimate say as to which targets are pursued and, while there may on occasion be direct contact between management staff and the oligarch, the discussions tend to go through the multilingual director, Marina Granovskaia, who is an increasingly influential figure at Stamford Bridge. She is essentially responsible for negotiating all transfers in and out of the club these days, as well as player and management contract negotiations and re-negotiations. The Russian-born Canadian national, whose role as a senior advisor to Abramovich pre-dates the oligarch’s arrival in English football, speaks with rival clubs and with agents to see the transfers signed off. DF

 

Crystal Palace

 

Crystal Palace’s transfer policy has had to adapt over each year of the current owners’ five-season tenure as the club progressed from the lower reaches of the Championship into the Premier League with virtually a new manager at every turn. They employed Iain Moody as a sporting director in 2013-14 in recognition that their scouting structure needed upgrading given the calibre of player they are now targeting has risen, though he resigned and was not replaced last autumn. Alan Pardew, appointed at the turn of the year, now enjoys considerable influence in terms of identifying potential recruits, liaising with an evolving scouting department, with the negotiations over fees and salaries essentially undertaken by the co-chairman, Steve Parish. This summer, once again, the quality of player on their wish-list has stepped up, posing its own challenges in terms of salaries and, possibly, agents’ fees with Palace a club who are learning every transfer window. DF

 

Everton

 

Part of the attraction of Everton for Roberto Martínez – like David Moyes before him – is the straightforward, clearly defined and even old-fashioned way the club operates in the transfer market. The manager has full authority on who comes into the club (in Martínez’s case, having consulted with his assistant manager Graeme Jones and the chief scout Kevin Reeves) and the chairman, Bill Kenwright, usually leads the negotiations. AH

 

Leicester City

 

Leicester have a team of technical scouts watching games via Wyscout, which provides access to videos and statistics of players all over the world, as well as talent spotters on the ground at home and overseas – all of which seems unlikely to change in the wake of Nigel Pearson’s sacking. As things stand Steve Walsh, the joint assistant manager and head of recruitment, views the lists of recommendations submitted and in consultation with the manager and Jon Rudkin, the director of football, decides what leads to follow up. Rudkin, after liaising with the club’s Thai owners, brokers the deals. SJ

 

Liverpool

 

The future of Liverpool’s famed transfer committee was in question as the owners, Fenway Sports Group, conducted a review into last season’s flawed campaign but it has remained intact for the club’s decisive entry into this summer’s transfer market. Basically, since Brendan Rodgers became manager in 2012, it has worked like this: Rodgers, the head of recruitment Dave Fallows, the chief scout Barry Hunter, the head of performance and analysis Michael Edwards, the chief executive Ian Ayre and FSG’s president Mike Gordon comprise the group that decides Liverpool’s entire transfer strategy. AH

 

Manchester City

 

Txiki Begiristain is the sporting director and the chief fixer of transfers for the club. The club work to the continental model of having expendable managers within an over-arching football structure. This means potential targets are identified in a fluid, quasi-committee basis, though Manuel Pellegrini would rarely have any player forced upon him by Begiristain or Ferran Soriano, the chief executive, who is the most powerful man on the ground at the Etihad Campus. JJ

 

Manchester United

 

Ed Woodward, the executive vice-chairman, has stated that all recruits are Louis van Gaal’s choices. The Dutchman identifies who he would like and Woodward’s charge is to bring them to Manchester United. Van Gaal’s status as one of the elite managers means he can wield this influence to act as an unofficial chief executive as he did when intervening to ensure Memphis Depay joined when the PSV Eindhoven forward might have signed for Liverpool or Paris Saint-Germain. JJ

 

Newcastle United

 

Steve McClaren may be on the St James’ Park board but the words “cosmetic” and “semantics” spring immediately to mind concerning the relationship between his directorship and transfers. In reality McClaren remains very much a European style head coach with transfer targets identified by Graham Carr, officially the chief scout but effectively the director of football. Although Mike Ashley, the owner, delegates the day to day running of the club to Lee Charnley – the managing director and the man responsible for getting Carr’s proposed deals across the line – he continues to have the final say on signings. One of the reasons for Alan Pardew’s departure is that he did not want some of Carr’s recruits – the £12m Rémy Cabella for instance. But Carr and McClaren have a better relationship and share closer football visions so the arrangement may work better. It will also help that Ashley is willing to relax a previous reluctance to sign players aged over 26 and of steering clear of the British market. LT

 

Norwich City

 

Norwich’s strategy has shifted slightly since Alex Neil became manager in January. Neil has the final say on all first-team recruitment: he identifies the players he requires and transfers are then worked on by the club’s football executive board. The chief executive, David McNally, is the man who leads negotiations and works to complete deals with other clubs. The first signing of Neil’s reign, Tony Andreu from his former club Hamilton, unmistakably bore the new manager’s hand. Joining McNally on the football executive board are the technical director Ricky Martin and a yet-to-be-named head of recruitment (the position has been vacant since March). It was originally set up last summer to support Neil Adams, Neil’s predecessor, who was relatively inexperienced in a first-team management role. The idea was for a more corporate, shared approach to recruitment strategy, but Neil has been given greater autonomy and McNally was quick to confirm this upon his arrival. “Alex will decide players coming in and ones leaving,” he said. “The other people are there to support him. No way is anyone going to join the club without authorisation from the manager.” NA

 

Southampton

 

The club have a recruitment department, in which a team of analysts monitor players around the world and the data is stored in what is known as the “Black Box”. Succession planning is the buzz phrase and looking far ahead is key. If a player is about to leave, the idea is that the analysts have replacements already lined up. When the manager, Ronald Koeman, wants to sign a player, he and the executive director, Les Reed, specify the position and/or attributes required and the analysts then make suggestions. Reed does the negotiations. DH

 

Stoke City

 

Four parties have a say in the transfer process and meet regularly to discuss strategy. Mark Hughes, the manager, determines the attributes he is looking for in a particular position and then it is up to the scouting department, led by Mark Cartwright, Stoke’s technical director, to identify talent with those player profiles in mind and to draw up a list of possible options. With the financial parameters set by Stoke’s owners, the Coates family, Hughes puts the players in order of preference and Tony Scholes, the club’s chief executive, has the job of negotiating with agents and clubs over the salaries and transfer fees. Stoke only sign players who the manager wants. SJ

 

Sunderland

 

As sporting director, Lee Congerton – a former Chelsea chief scout and Hamburg technical director – is the man responsible for sourcing and securing signings. He reports to Margaret Byrne, the chief executive and Ellis Short, the owner, who has the final say on price. Yet while Dick Advocaat is, like Steve McClaren at Newcastle, primarily a “mud on boots” head coach he and Congerton work closely together and the sporting director is prepared to accept his advice. If theirs promises to be a collaborative relationship, things were much more strained between Congerton and Gus Poyet, Advocaat’s predecessor. Although Poyet was delighted when Congerton beat several rivals to Jermain Defoe’s signing, the pair generally disagreed over recruitment. LT

 

Swansea City

 

David Leadbeater, head of recruitment, Tim Henderson, technical recruitment scout, and George Foster, head of European scouting, are the key figures when it comes to the identification of players. Garry Monk, Swansea’s manager, also draws up his own targets. Swansea like to watch potential signings over a long period of time – André Ayew was tracked for two years and likewise Bafetimbi Gomis – and Monk is heavily involved in the final selection process. The names are fed to Huw Jenkins, the chairman, whose total control of negotiations expedites the process. Monk and Jenkins have to be in agreement for a player to be brought in. SJ

 

Tottenham

 

Daniel Levy has chopped and changed in search of the ideal structure, alternating between working with a sporting director or not. The chairman currently has one in Franco Baldini who, when he joined, believed that he would be the head of recruitment. Levy has since brought in Paul Mitchell as the head of recruitment, which has raised questions as to Baldini’s purpose. Mitchell arrived from Southampton, where he enjoyed a good working relationship with Mauricio Pochettino, the Tottenham manager. Pochettino says that the club have lists of targets in every position and it is Levy who invariably sets the parameters in the deals. DH

 

Watford

 

Luke Dowling, former head of recruitment at Portsmouth and Blackburn, was appointed as sporting director last September and concentrates on the domestic market, while chief scout Filippo Giraldi keeps an eye on the continent (though his role is likely to change if Nicola Salerno, who recently left his post as sporting director at Leeds, joins the club as is widely expected). Watford are owned by the same family that controls Udinese in Italy and Granada in Spain, and much of the process of identifying and recruiting players for all three sides still takes place in Udine, overseen by the former Napoli and Italy striker Andrea Carnevale – though it was interesting that Watford were the only one of the three to officially send scouts to the European Under-21 Championship. SB

 

West Bromwich Albion

 

Jeremy Peace, Albion’s chairman, decided to adopt what he described as a European model many years ago after becoming frustrated with the way managers were spending money but that structure, which saw a sporting or technical director sitting on the board, has just been shelved. The dismissals of Terry Burton, Albion’s technical director, and Mervyn Day, the club’s head of recruitment, mean that Tony Pulis has strengthened his powerbase and can exercise more control over transfers. Richard Garlick, director of football administration, handles negotiations and Peace must approve and sign off transfers, but Pulis now has a major influence over the whole process. SJ

 

West Ham United

 

The club’s recruitment is now run by David Moyes’s old scout at Everton, Tony Henry, who arrived in east London last year. West Ham are beginning to broaden their horizons and have already signed Pedro Obiang from Sampdoria and Dimitri Payet from Marseille. There is a growing focus on youth and pace. The co-owner, David Sullivan, also involves himself in transfers. He took the credit for the signing of Diafra Sakho last summer – there were suggestions that Sam Allardyce was unsure about the Senegalese striker – and Mauro Zarate said that he was Sullivan’s choice. However Allardyce’s replacement, Slaven Bilic, will be able to use his knowledge of eastern European and Turkish football to spot players. JS

http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2015/jul/03/premier-league-transfers-who-decides-club-buys?CMP=share_btn_tw

Agreed.

 

The way I see it is that our club has their own channels to release relevant information and should do so where appropriate. In the days of social media, the message is spread quickly enough without the need for indulging muck-raking journalists and newspapers.

By hiring the same PR man that Green brought on board, it would seem that your wishes will never be fulfilled. It would be great, mind.

As usual they will all go out at the first hurdle to nobodies and be a complete and utter embarrassment. We are no better, arguably worse given our resources.

Aberdeen should get through this round and get Rijeka in Q2. Teams from the former Yugoslavia are in complete disarray at the moment so could go further.

Europa League - Qualification

 

Alashkert FC 1 St.Johnstone 0 (Manasyan 59.)

Shkendija 79 1 Aberdeen 1 (Kirovski 84 / McGinn 79)

 

Apart from that ...

 

Cork 1 Knattspyrnufelag Reykjavik 1

Glenavo 1 Shakhter Soligorsk 2

Glentoran 1 MSK Zilina 4

Linfield 2 NSI Runavik 0

Skonto Riga 2 St. Patrick's 1

West Ham 3 Lusitanos 0

 

And on a sidenote, Spartans / Berwick lost 6-0 to Slovan Bratislava, but one has to look hard to actually find them on the football map. For despite the names, they are not a Scottish/English team.

Why are those two ties included in a list containing British teams?

Spartans are from Edinburgh. The team which lost last night are from Hamrun in Malta.

Level 5 work for the club so they're not going to be spinning negative stories like we've seen over the last day or two.

 

Thankfully more and more of our fans have had their eyes opened to daft crap like this (whether positive or negative) so it's easy to laugh it off.

This is the first that I have heard of this 'row'. I read it as a riposte from Ibrox to whatever has gone before. Apologies if I got the wrong end of the stick.

Is that the smell of Jack Irvine in the morning...?

I would say it's more like the smell of Jim Traynor in the morning. If anything, Jack would have been yesterday.

The snippet of the story on the back page covers the 'thanks for nothing' gripe, but is the holiday pay issue explained on the inside?

Your dad is probably bigger than his too. For fucks sake grow up; this isn't school. Any brain-dead moron can go to a game, it doesn't mean they understand anything whatsoever.

Well, you would say that, Captain Stream.

Can everyone please refrain from the petty squabbles (admittedly I am being a touch hypocritical after my squabble on the transfer rumours thread with dB - but I can admit to it ) and request for credentials.

 

The number of times you have been able to attend games surely doesn't determine whether or not you support the Club. I honestly thought we were better than that.

No, I can stoop to whatever level is required. If someone is not only going to continually purport to be staunch as fuck but also questions my credentials, they need to be brought down a peg or two.

This thread was started with the intention of receiving pats on the back, so when it backfires, the insecurities come out along with the claws.

Away with ye.

 

Yet again you are attempting to suggest that if people don't agree with YOU then they must not be Rangers supporters.

 

It is tiresome and unbecoming a Rangers fan.

Let him hang himself. I've probably seen Rangers play in Germany more times than he has seen them anywhere, so it's like water off a duck's back.

Is that for real ??? WTF !!!!

Celtic are playing three friendlies there and have set up a temporary shop. St. Mirren are being paid rent. Everything seems possible for a buck.

Not sure what is worse, people abusing our club, people accepting this as a normal modus operandi, or people making fun of those not accepting any of this behaviour. I would, though, regard neither of these people as Rangers supporters, rather on the contrary.

 

As is said in the Know thy enemy - thread, it seems that certain media people look and strive for a reaction, rather than anything else. The above - despite danger of being sin-binned for it - looks very much like such behaviour to me.

The picture is of two beat policemen walking by a deserted Ibrox which is in darkness. As there is no game being played, and the picture relates to the story it accompanies, how the hell does it bring the name of Rangers into disrepute?

Fantastic use of the word preposterous dude.

 

Pity it applies to you so frequently eh?

You came on just to post that?

Are you his boyfriend?

Is that not better than a dignified silence ?

No, it's just preposterous.

Next time some rabid yahoo starts spouting off about Rangers being a new club, wouldnt it be good if we had a robust CEO calling these people an 'uneducated social underclass' or something ? Can you imagine the furore that would cause amongst them ????

You want the Rangers CEO to trawl Twitter and Facebook so that he can call people names? That idea makes your Reid / Kane / Fullerton / CIA / Boy Scouts conspiracy seem reasonable.

Narrows it down.

Thanks, lads.

How many seats were eligible for renewal?

But indirectly you would feel his effect, he would be shaping things said about our club. He feeds Radio Snydede, BBCeltland and Spiers and co, he gives them ammo that they can hardly wait to use; he spreads lies about or club far and wide so that our fans are thought of as he depicts them. you may not see his name but you would feel the influence

Exactly how does this influence manifest itself? Making one use terms like Snyde, BBCeltland or having an uncontrollable urge to insert an 'h' into any word that doesn't require it?

To our enemies & detractors who were trying to shut us down for good in 2012 the likes of McGillivan were invaluable.

Priceless and worthless have two decidedly different meanings.

Aye' date=' Im sure the suggestion by 3 names that King offered Ashley his shares should come under the heading of normal football banter.[/quote']

 

 

What should it be filed under?

 

There are likely to be half a dozen folk at most who know whether the claim has any veracity. I doubt if any of them have the least bit interest in some attention-seeking fantasist.

Thats the impression I got reading that paragraph Frankie' date=' I got the feeling of a sense of acquiescing towards this individuals foul mouthed rants against both our club and support.[/quote']

 

 

Did you grow up in a bubble?

 

Foul-mouthed rants against a rival club and support has been the norm since the game started. Only in these days of ultra sensitivity and faux offendedness has it become an issue. The internet is a wonderful thing.....but for some of the cretins who are allowed to access it without being supervised by a carer.