cooponthewing

Ian does a great job in trawling the print tabloids for their guff but whenever I see someone with a paper now I just sigh. They look like a historical artefact who belong in a musesm. Print journalism is dead and they don’t give a monkeys anymore. Anyone can print anything that is controversial or derogatory towards us and get well paid for it.

I have no interest in the national side whatsoever. I wish all our players would blank it. It also can’t be much fun for any bears who decide to watch Scotland at hanpden?

Surely the facts speak for themselves then re the citation table etc. This is so blatant it’s physically nauseating. People remember the Gordon Kung fu kick etc that was deemed legitimate by the CO Pete, so the consistency question is bang on. That being taken into account McGregor would have no case to answer. Additionally, the blatant bias is breathtakingly arrogant on the part of the CO. As GS exclaimed, Wow?

Famous last words?

No way! I just mentioned in another thread if the Jack challenge was a yellow then they had to overturn this? Ian is bang on, they won’t allow us to win the league.

The irony is that I think this gives them an out for shaggers appeal. The can’t ban him after saying that’s ok.

Absolutely Buster?

It’s a red all day long. His foot is in a position that can cause serious or life threatening injury. It’s aggressive in its action and imo intent. It dosnt matter if he ”ment” to hurt the player. If Shagger is a red then that’s a “double red”.

The CO themselves decides what is exceptional therefore has the power to fast track or not. This brings us back to Rangers players previously and Lego muncher when she was “ on holiday”?

Apparently, it was Kilmarnock insisting on the same price due to our guaranteed CCC money. We wanted to reduce the prices for this game. I heard this on the H+H Patreon daily update so don’t blame me if not accurate?

Away to the sheep if we win replay! FFS why can’t we get a home tie?

Be interesting to know how much the usual nightly Snyde SSB has lost listeners too? It’s sickening listening to Guidi, Wilson, Keevins and the host control the St Pats agenda. I stopped listening to it and stick to talkSPORT. There must be many more.

No chance Compo. Take a look at the table and see how much advantage that lot get from it. The CO is an effective weapon for them. I wonder when the last citation for St Pats was? What year?

Until the other clubs stop relieving Liewell and get off their knees nothing will change. It’s a complete carve up and corrupt from top to bottom.

Pretty awful really! The one bonus is that it takes up another of Morelos games a week on Wednesday.

It would go to a replay on Wednesday IF we get the draw? The way I feel right now I would be happy to take a draw?

He was also piss poor in the 2nd half at the livestock fertilising shed! I would have liked to have seen lafferty too but I guess we see how it goes?

This was my thoughts too yesterday dB. They are acting very politically and this imo, is exactly what will happen.

I think Pete was referring to retrospective action. If the opposing team gain no advantage (e. g. Penalty award or free kick) then they won’t use it. Just a case of referee missed it so tough.

Excellent point Pete, totally agree.

That crossed my mind earlier too.

That’s SFA mental? You can’t just add an extra game because of losing an appeal? That’s madness! I understand they can add if you appeal and they look at it again but it’s surely not mandatory?

I was just saying that Craig. I think they have added an extra game?

Can someone tell me if I’m wrong but have they added an extra game in to Morelos ban? Was it not 2 games initially?

We need to lawyer up and go after this lot. No more bullshit. This is an all out orchestrated agenda by Liewell and his puppets in the halls of power.