Jump to content

 

 

StuGers

  • Posts

    2,274
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by StuGers

  1. 1 hour ago, the gunslinger said:

    The moron that threw the coin in our game has a lot to answer for. 

     

    The sad thing here is the ref made no mistakes against celtc. Rangers yes celtc no. 

     

    If this is the kind of attack they get for having a good game where celtc are concerned no wonder they are worried. 

     

    Rangers concern me here though. We should have made a video up of the two brown red card offenses. The penalty the 3 dives from brown and tge others from natcham and christy and played it on a loop at our press conference. 

    We need to go on the offensive and create a video every match.

    I regularly think referees are against us and have been the most biased against us for seasons.

  2. 21 hours ago, Soulsonic5791 said:

    Suspiciously, a story regarding Gordon Neely has made it to number three on the most watched videos on the BBC news website. A story from May no less!

     

    An orchestrated campaign by dhims in denial who have nothing better to do on their holidays? Or facilitation by techs in PQ, Media City or Network?

    Celtic’s online propaganda machine in full flow.

     

    Or one compliant BBC employee up to their old tricks.

     

    Or both.

  3. Another point I wanted to make is;
     
    The rest of the MSPs aren’t covering themselves with glory.
    If the Conservatives or Labour want to show themselves to have any credibility, they must also raise their head above the parapet and ask the question as to why this hasn’t been investigated as a full case. 
     
    These parties are in danger of losing any chance of vote from me if they continue to be complicit in this cover up via their silence, and I’m sure I’m not alone where this is concerned.
     
    The recent petition, which was well intended but not executed in the best way, had tens of thousands of signatures. I’m sure this is a good indicator of how many votes are at peril if they continue to present this absolute horror story doesn’t exist.

     

    What is even more dangerous is that the more they ignore this, the more likely it is to happen again. What kind of message does it give out to other clubs who stumble across this horror? The message it gives is that you may as well cover it up, because there will be zero repercussion. What is to say that this doesn’t apply to other large institutes? They will just use Celtic as a precedent.

  4. I’ve noticed on Twitter now that the common answer for an MSP response when they even acknowledge any post to them questioning their thoughts on the Paedophile Ring that operated at Celtic Park is;

     

    “I’ve not heard of that, please email me”.

     

    Now, I’ve seen two very high profile cases of this recently.

     

    Firstly is from Humza Yousaf. This man is the SNP’s / Scottish Justice Minister. If there is anyone that is supposed to have their finger on the pulse of the courts and high profile cases, then he’s your man. So he apparently doesn’t know about the case. If he’s somehow missed it, then it’s gross incompitence.

     

    Just yesterday, Hannah Bardell, the SNP’s Sports and Media spokesperson upon questioning by Helene Gray (mother of Celtic victim Andrew Gray - also same scenario for Yousaf) denied knowledge of the case(s). Again, for someone who is supposed to be focussed on Sport and Media, you would think they would be aware of the ongoing conveyor belt of paeodphiles being convicted, all operating out of Celtic Park. But, alas, no. Again, is it incompitence? Surely the chances of both high profile SNP MSPs in such prominent relevant positions can’t be that poor at their job that they miss these multiple recent and current cases?

    It is of note that on these two cases, it wasn’t the previous stock response of “ongoing case, can’t comment” opt out.

    It is also worth noting that Ms Burrell also copped out by noting that the questioner, Mrs Gray, wasn’t in her constituency. So even though she’s the Sports spokeswoman, she isn’t willing to take a question about the biggest scandal in sporting history as the complainant isn’t her constituent.

     

    So the real question is - have the SNP got a party policy that upon pressure to answer this question they simply reply, “I’ve not heard about this, please contact me via email?”. Surely that must be the case? The previously mentioned “ongoing case” opt out is no longer valid.

     

    Even more sinister, the pressure for these Ministers to avoid this topic must be so great that they are more willing to publically humiliate themselves and tarnish their professional reputation by publically feigning buffoonery than to even discuss what is all over the papers. Why are the SNP so keen to kill this story? If the SNP are to ever even consider getting votes from a large proportion of Scottish society, they must be seen as acting in a transparent and fair manner, and they are currently completely blowing any signs of acting in this way out the water.

     

    Again, it is sinister.

     

     








     

  5. 36 minutes ago, Scott7 said:

    Remote from any other conduit of information and having five spare minutes I flicked on Pacific Shelf, sorry, Pacific Quay for confirmation that celtic had got possession of today’s prize and heard Richard Gordon begin to describe Rogers’ gracious acceptance of whatever was being given as an offering and so switched off again.

     

    It was the big Don’s tone of voice that intrigued. Auld mither Gordon’s loon sounded rueful but nonetheless happy that a personal disappointment was made better by the fact that good friends had benefited.

     

    26th, a man of gteater fortitude than I, will no doubt give the roll call of the happy and the sad. The big question: does St Pat’s Hampden triumph make up for the Tynecastle disaster?

    If you think that his attitude towards Brendan was strange, you should see the way MacLennan was looking at Rodgers. It would genuinely make you sick.

  6. 43 minutes ago, ian1964 said:

    "Inaccurate" - Celtic's claim about value of golf tourism to Scotland dismissed

    Claims made in a report released yesterday by Celtic Football Club about the value of golf tourism to Scotland's economy have been dismissed by tourism officials.

    A new independent report, prepared by the Fraser of Allander Institute, revealed that the spending of Celtic and their supporters was worth £165m in 2016/17 to the Scottish economy, helping to support the equivalent of 2,820 full-time equivalent jobs in Scotland.

    To illustrate the scale of this contribution, the report noted that “other studies have estimated golf tourism’s contribution to Scotland’s GDP is around £155million each year”.

    A national newspaper subsequently carried the headline "Celtic 'worth more to Scots economy than golf'" on its front page today.

    However, in a statement provided to bunkered.co.uk, that claim has been rejected by a key golf official at VisitScotland, the national tourism agency for Scotland.

    “Our industry is continuing to work hard towards achieving an industry ambition of growing the value of golf tourism to Scotland to more than £300m by 2020, and with great collaboration and significant highlights in the coming years, including next year’s Solheim Cup at Gleneagles, we are confident of reaching this ambitious target,” said Alan Grant, Senior Golf Manager at VisitScotland

    “The figures produced by Celtic are certainly encouraging for growing tourism to Scotland and highlights that the impact of tourism spreads far and wide.

    "However, the figures quoted in the press activity over recent days in relation to golf tourism are inaccurate.

    “In its widest sense, the golf industry in Scotland is worth in excess of £1.1bn annually, supporting more than 20,000 jobs. This underlines Scotland’s position as the Home of Golf and outlines the key contribution the industry makes to the Scottish economy."

    http://www.bunkered.co.uk/golf-news/inaccurate-celtics-claims-about-value-of-golf-tourism-to-scotland-dismissed

    Most of their lies are easily debunked.

  7. 9 minutes ago, buster. said:

    Looks like a statue unveiling.

     

    Given Strachan took over as their manager in 2005 and Tommy Burns is in the picture, November of 2005, 2006 or 2007. 

    It really is sinister. Why is there a guy in faux-military garb with a Republican flag?

    Sometimes I wonder if I’m just a bit sensetive to Celtic and their links to the IRA but, fuck me, they haven’t half flaunted it over the years. That’s truly despicable!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.