StuGers
-
Posts
2,274 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Posts posted by StuGers
-
-
On 07/11/2018 at 15:01, buster. said:
I doubt he'll be on a payroll but he certainly ticks a fair few boxes to be given a platform by Cosgrove/Off the Ball.
I honestly believe they are getting paid. It’s the only way that the coordinated campaing can be driven. There are too many ex-“Rangers men” who’s opinions suddenly shifted in tandem.
0 -
1 hour ago, Frankie said:
Eardley was on Off the Ball the other week.
I didn't hear it and he usually stays away from the football stuff on Twitter.
Probably another one who’s entered Peter’s Payroll.
0 -
23 games, 14 goals, 8 assists so far this season.
Fantastic asset.
4 -
13 hours ago, forlanssister said:
I note Sportstscene caveated the Morelos coin incident with a claim that the St Mirren keeper Craig Samson was hit with a coin.
Absolute liars.
0 -
40 minutes ago, buster. said:
Just for the record, a tweet from Blue Room Art
To see full tweet you'll need to click on it so as to enlarge.
Now that’s quite revealing.
0 -
I know quite a few gay Rangers fans. They are, and always will be welcome.
For those that are asking whether everyone should be included, the answer is, yes, of course. But that depends on whether they want to do us damage or not.
Inclusivity is key in all parts of life, as long as it is natural. Should a group of Black Rights activitists be forced to include KKK members?
The whole forcing of inclusivity, whilst seeming liberal, can something actually be fascist in its execution.
0 -
4 hours ago, pete said:
You are using it as an agenda as much as the republican part of the SNP. Rangers supporters or Protestants who want to live in a free Scotland have the right to vote who they want as do Catholics have the right to vote to remain in Britain.
And everyone had the right to call out the absolute hypocrisy of supposedly supporting Rangers whilst they are under attack from the SNP.
0 -
3 hours ago, BEARGER said:
I assume that’s directed at me? I saw Dornans’ idea so posted it, don’t agree with it. As far as Adam is concerned I think it’s a stupid tweet, could be the guy was just disappointed at his team losing. But as a politician he should be careful what he posts on line you would think. It does seem to me that some SNP/YES people have given up on the Rangers support and see all of us as the UB’s, a political mistake in my view.
Interesting viewpoint. Can you name us any SNPer that hasn’t given up on getting a vote from a non-cult-indoctrinated Rangers fan? (Not that I actually know any of them in real life).
0 -
30 minutes ago, MacK1950 said:
It's bad enough to see crap like this but please don't give these aas****s a platform on this forum.
Please explain why that poster is an “aas****s”?
0 -
Just posted this in the ongoing topic in the Lounge.
The usual suspects will say it is just another coincidence that an SNP councillor / MSP / MP is criticising Rangers / Rangers fans.
0 -
I thought the booing was at the referee.
1 -
Are we surprised? They do it every year.
The only shock is that any of the media has raised their head above the parapet to report it.
0 -
It really is incredible how much of a protected species Neil Lennon is.
He openly goads fans, gets hit on the chest with a coin and embarrassingly lies on the ground for ages holding his face.
Yet all the chat is about he is discriminated against for being an Irish Catholic when there is already more than one other Irish Catholic working in the same league, playing at the same stadiums, who this hasn’t even come near to happening to.
Why are the press not saying - Neil Lennon is an idiot and a fraud, because that’s the simple truth.
Is someone behind the scenes paying for this press response? Or is is it sadly that when it comes to someone of their own religion, they are excusing him and using him as a tool to spread this recurring message that they are terrible, terrible victims in this massively oppressive country and city (where they hold power in a fantastically unrepresentative fashion)?
0 -
Worrall and Flanagan were chronic tonight.
Kent could do with a rest too.
0 -
18 minutes ago, barca72 said:
Dissent.
Was it a penalty though?
0 -
Unbelievable stuff.
We are so reliant on going down the wing that it looks like we don’t know how to run the ball through them.
So many times there were gaps that could be run into and we passed it (square or backwards).
On Killie, they are one of the dirtiest teams I’ve seen. Every dirty trick, they used it.
The ref lost control of the game from
kick off. He was less than pathetic.
Was the Morelos booking for a dive correct or was it a penalty?
2 -
3 hours ago, ian1964 said:
Thanks, that’s the one.
0 -
Don’t know if the pic has already been uploaded here but there is clear cut pictures that the Aberdeen goal should never have stood.
0 -
I would have thought McCrorie would have been in with a chance. He is the future of Scotland.
0 -
I’ve said it before - you should be pleased that they are wearing their uniform. It is a clear indicator of who to avoid. Just snigger, give them a look that solidifies your superiority.... then walk away.
0 -
I’m really pleased with Scotland’s performance to be honest.
At odds of 10/11 for a Portugal win, I can say I was delighted. Easy money.
2 -
Can someone explain how these are any different than EBTs?
1 -
1 hour ago, BEARGER said:
Club 1872 Statement - Paul Gascoigne's Scottish Hall of Fame nomination The decision of the Scottish Football Hall of Fame committee and the Scottish Football Association to withdraw the nomination of Paul Gascoigne to the Scottish Football Hall of Fame, once again highlights the incredible hypocrisy of Scottish football’s governing bodies.
As far as Club 1872 is aware, moral issues are not the dominion of the Hall of Fame committee however it now appears there is a moral test which some individuals must pass to be inducted into the Hall of Fame. The SFA and the committee should clarify whether they will be assessing the moral fibre of all past and future entries using this test. If Hall of Fame positions are to be judged on contribution to the Scottish game then there is no question that Paul Gascoigne should be honoured. If not, then many more than him will need to be stripped of this accolade or be deemed ineligible for induction.
The SFA recently released the new Scotland kit and used a player convicted on racism related charges as the pin-up boy for their marketing campaign. They also employ another individual in a high profile position who has previously made headlines for overtly racist, sexist and homophobic comments. SFA board members indicated no concern whatsoever when these individuals took prominent roles in promoting and running their organisation. They should now publicly clarify which SFA board members objected and if any attempts were made to influence the committee to withdraw the nomination.
Aside from the hypocrisy of the SFA we are also extremely concerned by the attempt to blame Paul’s health for the reversal of the nomination. On the back of Mental Health Awareness Day, this reference is not only offensive but irresponsible, and demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of mental health issues.
Club 1872 wishes Paul all the best with his health challenges and we hope that the Rangers family and wider football community will be able to provide him with the support that has been so lacking in this troubling and shameful episode.
Issued by Supporters Voice Limited, a Club 1872 company
Club 1872
Spot on.
0 -
3 hours ago, JohnMc said:
I'm the guilty one there. You should hear my pronunciation of Tavernier, that'll really grind your gears!
I don’t think anyone has quite perfected hi name yet!
1
TLB caught cheating
in General Football Chat
Posted
What occasion was that photo taken at!?