-
Posts
1,609 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Everything posted by Devil's advocaat
-
Match Thread [FT] Kilmarnock 2 - 3 Rangers (Morelos 23, 73; Kent 51)
Devil's advocaat replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
As much as I don't like them, killie ain't a bad side, the rheptiles haven't exactly blown them away twice recently either. I'd have bitten your arm off for 2-3 before the game. -
Match Thread [FT] Kilmarnock 2 - 3 Rangers (Morelos 23, 73; Kent 51)
Devil's advocaat replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Aye, fairly similar to my thoughts wbd, slowly but surely things are starting to work. We need a keeper badly though, Mcgregor just looks old, still has the ability to have a couple of top class saves in a game, but anything outside of where he wants to be in his area and its statue time. Mclaughlin just looks like his nerves have gone, and not many keepers ever come back from that. I've no idea what he was doing at the opener. Siegreist or zander clark would have walked into our team, and we could have signed either for the price of a wage. -
Match Thread [FT] Kilmarnock 2 - 3 Rangers (Morelos 23, 73; Kent 51)
Devil's advocaat replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Killie pies are shite, I'd happily see the name sullied whilst removing walker from the gene pool. -
A broken record, db 🤣
-
Aye, it's a hard one, as the boy tries like fuck, obviously loves it here, has all the pace in the world, and can produce all the tricks on his day. He was up against a more forward playing player at full back, who was gubbed, and that's probably our best way to utilise him. Sadly, we rarely play teams who expose themselves enough that his pace can be best exploited, that's the nature of the SPL. As long as he, and we, accept that this is about as good as it gets for him.
-
Match Thread [FT] Rangers 2 (Jack 61'; Roofe 94') - 1 Aberdeen AET
Devil's advocaat replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
The loss of hesgoal is still deeply mourned for such days.... -
Quite possibly mate.
-
Mine came from a club physio, Stewarty.
-
A good friend was on the medical staff at the time, and that was the reason. Granted, your theory would also have played a part in the decision.
-
I believe Windass was punted due to him having had a repeated injury (can't recall if it was hammy or achilles) and his subsequent numbers falling below a certain percentage.
-
Aye, there is a worry there, but as buster says, we need to give the manager some trust here. I used to argue that we shouldn't be shopping in the EPL, but I think that's changed. These clubs have so many players it's very easy to fall out of favour, and incredibly difficult to get back in. The clubs are so awash with cash, they almost give up on players as assets and get rid. I like the idea of this pair.