Gonzo79

I think a lot of us are genuinely fed up. Crowds are going to get smaller, on a regular basis, in the very near future.

Seems to be a common thing these days: if you're annoyed about something and go on a rant, make sure you include lots of buzzwords and stock phrases, even if they aren't appropriate.

You okay, Cammy?

It's quite normal for fans to applaud the team after a win and it's also common, throughout football, for a team to thank the fans after solid backing at an away match. Unfortunately, the first one doesn't seem to be happening very often when we're on our travels. Clement's record away from home (domestically) is very concerning. Which is weird, because his away record in Europe is excellent.

I said to my mate after the game we're now also rans. However, this is not "our level" and that sort of thinking needs to be immediately dismissed.

It's worrying when our defenders are getting bullied by opposition players so often. A basic part of having a good team is a commanding defence.

The board will be delighted with your support.

It's Park.

Our away form this season (I know it has only been three games) has been atrocious. We could've played for many more hours at Tynecastle, Parkhead and Rugby Park and still not scored.

That was a really poor performance. Hard to take anything positive from the match or being a Rangers supporter just now. It's never easy at Rugby Park but that was a gutless effort with naff all creativity.

Can we have another international break, please?

Sloppy passing, lack of urgency, dodgy defending and nothing up front. Grim viewing, so far.

Dessers and Lawrence - no wonder we look so toothless.

They do seem to benefit from excessive added time whenever they're not winning, that I'll grant you. However, we need someone to provide more specific details and make them public if favouritism is happening. No point going on about it unless we have facts to validate our concerns.

As expected. Can't help thinking Kasanwirjo deserves a starting slot.

I mean, when they hold the board up, the number is the minimum time to be added (this seems to confuse a lot of people, for whatever reason). Never watched that lot, so have no idea about the added time...or added added time.

Just win.

We still have two matches to play on that abomination of a surface, as we're scheduled to play Killie there in February. Groan.

So you agree, my arguments had some substance?

Time machines do not exist. That's a very straightforward, indisputable fact. As Rousseau has pointed out, Kent's stats are worse than Cerny's, Cortez's, Matondo's and McCausland's, so my 'utter bollocks' comment definitely does have substance.

I'm still stomping my feet about the length of time he stayed after his usefulness wore out (he wasn't the only one).

The reasons for those fans saying that were entirely different from my reason regarding Kent. Put simply: I think he's f*cking garbage. Even 'peak Kent' only turned up about seven or eight times a season. I thought he was a flop for the silly money we paid the Scouse tramps.

The sheep have had a few flukey wins on their recent run, so I fully expect the usual humping for them at the Piggery. I just hope we can take advantage, either way.

Makes some of the arguments even more ridiculous (and I'm a fine one to talk!).

I'm scunnered with Rangers anyway but if we brought Kent back, I'd seriously consider packing it in completely.