Gonzo79

I cancelled BT a few months ago. I refuse to pay that cretin's wages.

Is he still bankrupt?

Morelos and Herrera should start for us. Miller did nothing again yesterday - waste of a shirt

That's a fair point. It's just some lads having a laugh though. We can't spend our whole lives terrified of the worst possible consequences of being in crowded areas.

I'm British. I got hospitalised after a match by opposition fans but I still go to the football.

A smoke bomb isn't an explosive device. I'm not really pro or anti taking them - I have no intention of ever taking one and have never done so.

It's our over-sensitivity that worries me. No wonder Hibs, vermin and Motherwell fans goad us so easily. 40 years ago we'd have tanned them.

Jack has been our best player this season.

Yes, that is true.

I realise that. It's a genuine question.

Can you tell me what match there were smoke bombs lett off in the disabled section?

Fair enough. Ridiculous but true.

I've been near smoke bombs a few times and never seen any disabled fans taken away. The have hundreds of flares at matches in the Balkans and do okaay.

We're British. Stiff upper lip. Deal with it.

I'm not a Union Bear member and don't sit amongst them often. I'm also not very sensitive and have developed a very thick skin over the years.

Hopefully him and Herrera start from now on. Miller did nothing again today.

I think smoke bombs are okay and British society is overly sensitive.

We score and flare thrown onto pitch, absolute cretins. And we all know it's not a one man loner doing it.

That was a smoke bomb, not a flare.

Starting with Miller will cost PC his job.

I think that's the intention, Rab. Well, to be involved WITH the board, not as a hindrance.

The aim of Club1872 is very simple, Bill and you have stated it twice in your post there.

I know. I had a lot going on and cancelled quite a lot of things that week - long story.

Fascinating.

Any Bears who have a go at Club1872 obviously don't trust their fellow Bears with involvement in the boardroom. Understandable in some respects. They seem to want a sugar daddy...ain't gonna happen.

I packed in my membership after the 5-1 game because I was bloody annoyed. I may return but I think things have to look better before doing so. But Bears having a bigger say in how the club is run is a very good thing in my view and I'm glad I've contributed.

As soon as I see Tom English or Chris McLaughlin mentioned, I know exactly what agenda is being adhered to and thus ignore.

Pair of despicable, speccy, smug and embarrassing 'journalists'.

Barjonas looks a class player - I have high hopes for him.

As an aside, I hate Feyenoord.

I'm in my late 30s and still prefer to stand, wherever possible. I appreciate that others prefer to sit and then you have to consider disabled supporters but I don't see why anyone would object to a safe standing area for 3-6,000.

So everyone has to sit down?

Younger people will much prefer standing with their mates and having a sing song, which means we get the next generation involved. If 10,000 Bears are against safe standing, good for them. They can stay quiet in their seats somewhere else and let a few thousand stand.

We must have the grumpiest support in world football.

To be fair, there are obviously rumours amongst the staff at Rangers which fans get wind of. Sometimes the club might be looking at someone and it doesn't go through - that's just football.

Some people take it far too seriously. Wait until it's official before getting excited.