plgsarmy

There are loads of fans looking for a ticket for this game!,you may be right but I'm sure Christine will check in frequently so it's fair to assume the ticket is still available!,anyway why are you getting all defensive?

I have no social life and nobody has sent me a PM. Maybe sitting beside me is not an attractive proposition.

My sister has to work so her ST is not being used on Monday. It's Main Stand Front, just along from the Directors Box. Anyone interested PM me.

I'm going, but with a 10 o'clock start I'll be struggling to get there on time.

I don't know the purpose of this statement. The Board have already said we will be funded until the end of the season. I'm also wondering what they will think of the comment about getting a fan on the Board when there already are fans on the Board. I light of recent discussions I find this very confusing.

I've always wanted one of these so please don't enter the competition guys.

The RFFF is maybe being dragged into the equation/discussions because it's linked with the Assembly, but I don't understand why the Assembly would need to continue under any newly proposed umbrella group when being an umbrella group was the raison d'etre of the Assembly in the first place.

 

You'd think any technical issues (RFFF monies for example) could be overcome and a new umbrella group could just replace the Assembly.

 

Obviously it's a complex situation though, so I might be viewing it too simplistically.

The idea is that all the organisations will cease to exist with the possible exception of the Association but talks are still at an early stage.

I'm a bit uncomfortable with the inclusion of the RFFF. It should be kept independent.

Derek, nobody from the RFFF has been involved in the meetings, unless you count Andy Kerr but he is there as a rep of the Assembly.

I think that they should be looking at a shareholders alliance as opposed to an amalgamation. The objectives of the RST and RF are very different (ignoring egos and all the rest of the politics) and a great deal of time and energy will be spent without an agreement being ultimately obtained (IMHO of course). Would be much easier to agree to vote together as a bloc.

The new proposal goes way beyond shareholding.

I can only speak for the RST here but our understanding was that a simple question was going to be asked and the various groups would be putting it out at the same time. I was not in favour of the full document going out in full, especially the methodology as there has been actually no discussion about this. No discussion has even been had over whether a CIC model is even the most appropriate way to go, far less that we would use the RF one for shareholding and ours for other projects. The document should only have contained the general principles behind it and why it it is advantageous for all Rangers supporters. This goes way beyond shareholding.

Should have added that I spoke to Stewart about the disabled facilities and he confirmed that the Board has this high on their agenda.

I thought the night went well. John and Stewart came across as passionate and sincere. The highlight of the night for me, apart from meeting Bearger, was when Gordon Dinnie spoke about our activities and achievements over the last year.

If any Gersnet member wants to come to the RST AGM on Friday let me know. We have John Gilligan and Stewart Robertson attending and someone can ask the question. If you are a member in your own right then obviously you don't need to let me know but Gersnet has life membership.

Great to see this happening at last.

Regardless of my personal views, it is what they are, simply, they are there to serve the interests of their members. There would be no need for two separate organisations if they had a singular goal. Let's not forget that RF was set up after the toys, once again, came out the RST pram.

Really, tell me more.

That simply can't happen , it's a very simplistic idea but from my understanding having been to some of the meetings it's not possible , if you know different please enlighten me

Anything's possible if it's the will of the members.

The guy is advertising his books with profits going to charity, so what's the relevance of the link you've posted?

Shut it you.:box:

wish the rst would ask some more important questions that actually matter.

 

Ashley can flap his gums all he wants , king will decide if we can pay it and by the looks of it there is nadda ashley can do about it.

What questions would you like asked?

The RST will be issuing a rather good response (at least I think so).

That's me renewed.

Name dropper! Could be he just didn't tell you.

No chance, SFA are apparently waiting for info from SARS, unless that has come in but it seems unlikely.

Here's a tweet posted by North Rd on RM ...

@becks1873: @SilverFox1872 board met with support groups tonight told them club say no Ashley EGM and King passed fit test. SFA statement tomorrow

 

Wonder if that's true. If it is then we should hear pretty soon about DK's investment, whether by share issue or other.

It isn't true.

any feedback from RST meeting?

We'll be putting something out, not sure when. Nothing earth-shattering.

I was with John Gilligan up until 6 tonight and if something has happened he didn't know.

07/05/2015 Counter Credit CRAIG MAC BGC £21.50 Balance £167.28

 

That's my son in law paid for 2 so the tally is now:

 

12 paid and another 3/4 committed but not paid, plus the speaker i.e. 16/17.

How much is it?

I hadn't responded before due to the dates not suiting me but I can go on 17th so will pay tonight.