colshy18

did hutton no make the assist for sionkos goal?

`error, the link you have clicked is not available`

how good is he? i harped on at the middle of last season on how we should try to get charlie adam back from st.mirren and then again at the end of the seaon so as mcleish didn`t get rid off him. he was an absolute sensation in paisley last season and won many awards. ok, we`re not paisley but i couldn`t beleive mcleish had agreed to loan out the one youngster that seemed to be making progress with us. maybe the years loan done him wonders and it was a clever move and too early for him, quite possibly. whatever, i`m so glad leguen has noticed how good this young guy is. he`ll make a big impact on us this seaosn and imo he`s going to go as far if not further than barry ferguson, if he keeps his head down and gets on with what he`s good at. keep up the good work wee man:thup:

to a certain degree i agree. mols was a sensation for a few months when he first joined and but for oliver khan khan he may have been able to get to the same status as hateley and mccoist. i think many supporters had a great deal of sympathy toward him because of his injury, but i honestly never thought he was the same player after his injury. he showed flashs of his skill and i hope i`m wrong but i think a lot of the support hold him high because he was badly injured but continued to get fit and come back and make some sort of comeback. i agree he`s not in the same boat as mccoist etc

i always heard "FUCK THE POPE" being sung LOUDER THAN EVER and being emphasised at the end of songs! not sure what to think of that!

i take it it was OUR davie provan and not the ginger haired gypo one?

danny, you can`t evaluate him overall with one performance against his old side. many people have poor debuts and it wouldn`t have made it easier for him that he had to try get past the new rangers defence virtually on his own. i stand by my saying that he should`ve been given another year. but, we`ll see how he progresses at well then!

i think you are right. i believe there were no players in the side but there was one in the squad? that right? piss poor and i agree with you mate. i know a few people on here will disagree with you about murray park because it`s produced hutton, smith, mccormack, and erm... but i still think it`s a white elephant but i honestly don`t think leguen will let it go on without utilising it for what it was intended going by his track record with youths in lyon and rennes!

ouch! jim!! your good at these cutting remarks on england:p

see if that was alex mcleishs side...they`d have either drawn 1-1 or lost 2-1. thank GOD for paul le guen:thup:

actually i`m struggling with `86 i think i might know it, but cannot say for sure. the others i know:D ok, let me rephrase it then, whoever remembers the losers?

thats why he`s the resident comedian!

see the bottom one, you can see pete in that!

aye but i didn`t say a tenner of what!!!

ow! sore one to take. who ever remembers who finished second?

under 19`s count as a major international tournament now?

what was the score?

i don`t have aproblem with ANY of that wija, but danny does!!!

it`s ok, it`s just me and danny disagreeing:p

didnt say that, i just said if you don`t like what wija said then go to the huddle;)

if you don`t like it then go to `the huddle`:admin:

you said it:thup:

don`t worry lads! it`s only killie. once we get round to playing them we`ll take them to bits:thup:

no way! i`m willing to bet ANYONE a tenner that they don`t get him!

whats the score now? was 2-0 to them when i turned off:flipa: