Forza

absoloute disgrace to remove the name of a man who gave us 9 in a row, Souness, Advocaat, McLeish, Walter and a host of top players we will never see the like of again.  How dare Dave King try to remove this man's great legacy.

17 hours ago, ranger_syntax said:

Who are you talking about?

You know exactly what I'm talking about

39 minutes ago, Gaffer said:

I'm afraid that it's you that's twisting words with that statement.  Just because someone votes YES doesn't mean they hate the UK.  People will vote YES for all sorts of reasons.

 

You always want to bring politics into football.  I wish you'd stop it.  It's counter productive and only segregates the support.  We are all Rangers fans.  Some of us will vote for parties that others don't like.  That's politics.  We all support Rangers.  That's football.  Let's not mix them up.

So Rangers is the only football club with politics attached to it?

3 minutes ago, buster. said:

Your criticism is open to counter......That's the way it works !

 

I'm not slow to make critical observations when I think they are merited but I just find that your blanket point about his guests not contributing anything, is so obviously wrong that it deserves to be questioned.

 

 

I noticed on another forum someone dared to question one of the pod guests and was hounded.

How dare someone say anything bad about Davie Edgar's mates was the general response.

Not imagining you're coming from that POV but I'm a little guarded.

The two on the above pod never disagreed with him once, other guests, Hogg and Bell are names that spring to mind, are also two names that I can never remember a decent contribution or discussion from other than silly in jokes about being Davie's mates. 

25 minutes ago, buster. said:

Pod Demigod in 'follow follow without question' controversy 

 

---------------------

 

Seriously, to say his guests contribute nothing either shows you haven't listened to many H&H podcasts or your hearing is very selective.

 

 

 

 

I listen to the regular & extra pods, i dont subscribe to Patreon so I cant comment on content on there. My hearing is fine.

Is H&H another sacred cow that no one is allowed to criticise?

usually like H&H but getting fed up of the lack of real content from the "panelists"

David Edgar is insightful and sometimes funny (not always, and not as much as he thinks he is) but the other guests contribute nothing, other than agreeing with him.

well done the UB

never highly rated Foderingham, considering he has conceded nearly 20 goals against Celtic maybe? All keepers are prone to howlers and he has had good moments.

but if we were talking about getting rid of him I wouldnt lose sleep.

Nice to see McGregor back, hope he can play consistently and to the best of his ability. 

NO sympathy. I have no doubt his intentions were honest, but he's not stupid and should be a bit more aware/clued in by now as to the climate of these things. 

9 hours ago, craig said:

Lol.  No.  My wife is a Hibbee, that's what pete was getting at

I hope she can cook!

been pals with a few Hibs fans in my time and recent years have seen one of them turn from a decent guy to a complete stereotypical moonhowler. The others are following suit. 

The cup final in '16 gave them far to big an opinion of themselves. 

20 hours ago, ranger_syntax said:

Will you underwrite his wages?

good point. probably not. still we've gambled a lot recently eh? 

I'd keep Pena. A proper coach with proper training might get something out of him

just want this season to be over with tbh

H&H was OK, bit sound-bitey but OK.....

4 hours ago, Frankie said:

There's no room for sentiment.

 

We need the very best talent at all levels throughout the club.  Jimmy Nicholl has served the club well over the years but his recent managerial/coaching record doesn't suggest he's the best option now.

but in 1994 he was our hero 

No. Thanks for all you have done Jimmy, but I cannot imagine he'll fit anywhere near Steven Gerrard's plans

Hi I'm new