A Horse With No Name
-
Posts
339 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by A Horse With No Name
-
-
Sorry for the spelling error lol , you've just made my point , all I did was make a generalisation and you bit because you thought it was aimed at you , then you come back with your own sly dig aimed at me , you dont do irony mate
Think it can be taken for granted you were talking about me - unless you meant him! :-)
0 -
Sorry for the spelling error lol , you've just made my point , all I did was make a generalisation and you bit because you thought it was aimed at you , then you come back with your own sly dig aimed at me , you dont do irony mate
Generalisations really are poor form in forums. If I won a million I couldn't go on Radio and say Celtic cheated the Taxman for millions by lying about attendances as I'd no doubt be taken to court etc etc but in that case making a generalism would be understandable, but when it comes to forums it really is poor form.
0 -
What because Craig is an admin he isn't allowed an opinion ,some people just have far to high an opinion of themselves
That should have been too with two o's!
Like referees they can have and exercise an opinion - where that falls flat is when it interfere's with their role. As for your wee snide remark I couldn't give a toss, you're no doubt angling for brownie points! Brownie points, that seems apt. :-)
0 -
Admin lording it over members is nothing new, on ff and rm they've had a right few over the years and I've probably been banned by most. For an awful long time rm had great admins but as always when forums take the populist view it goes downhill fast! They enter threads and engage in debate without exercising any sense of diplomacy much in the same way as Regan enters talks with fans groups he can't stand and without the power to silence them (like twitter etc) he just walks out - if only!
A good Admin is like a good referee - they're never noticed until they start acting like prima donnas. This Craig one is woeful he makes a general statement that followers of the BK's follow BLINDLY then shirks the responsible response by apologising! I hate the hun word but that applies to him fine - another budding Adolf in the making!
0 -
for some reason the term "pot & kettle" springs to mind....
Having read some of your SHITE - I'd gee it a couple of days and you'll be in their wee admin gang!
0 -
Where's that groan button?
One Solution Revolution. :-)
Tell me where's the "ignore Craig he talks shite" button? :-)
0 -
Poets Priests and Politicians have words to thank for their...
As an avid reader of the Socialist Workers Party's material it's clear that the 'thinking' (regurgitated crap more like) of some of the posters - one Admin I've spotted - on here is very arrogant and dismissive! Don't repeat the truth it might register...
Capitalism has brought our club close to ruin, and still there's Rangers fans who'll support this rotten system where poorly paid Rangers supporters are digging deep while we've got the supporters who think they know better and decide what is and isn't worthy of inclusion on a forum!
Come the Revolution it won't just be Whyte that gets put up against the wall!
0 -
Ach, don't be a drama queen. Peace and love comrade Dutchy.
If you're not careful the only people you'll have on the forum is your wee band of Admin posters!
0 -
Dutchy.
Trouble with the likes of him (and you get them in all forums) you give someone a little power and they abuse it - pathetic! I suppose those that run forums can't be picky but it really does spoil forums. After he refused to apologise to me he sent me a pm which I didn't even open such is my poor opinion of him.
On Paul Murray and The Blue Knights he said their followers followed BLINDLY! That despite them (and to a certain extent BK) being the only ones being open about their objectives and plans. Now it has become clear that of the three bidders left only PM and TBK's are the only ones who want to save our club, but I have to say anyone with an ounce of sense could see liquidation was the others' only plan as had they wished to save 140 years of history the would have issued a statement to that effect, as the only ramifications would be good (no down side). FFS if we're blind what does that make him!
Hell, I'd even go so far as to say these other two companies will asset strip.
So much for being blind!
Take my advice mate don't give him the time of day!
0 -
The fans organisations are also calling for:
Clarity from administrators over what legal proceedings, if any, have been instituted against Craig Whyte in order to gain control of his shares.
What's the betting the Administrators planned to issue a statement in a couple of weeks time stating "we have scheduled for a meeting with Craig Whyte to ask him to voluntarily sign over the shares to us, if that doesn't work we'll issue court proceedings after we've exhausted other means...". Tick tock so fekking predictable!
It's time for the RST, other fans groups and the officials Rangers to lobby the Government into action!
0 -
It seems to me that Whyte thought he was doing his pal (and maybe even himself?) in Duff & Phelps a favour by saying he’d not give (ahem) ‘his’ shares to Paul Murray. Clearly the idea was that the Administrators would resolve the matter in court and thereby use up more time in order to line their pockets, and at £400,000 pcm that’s some lining!
I’m of the opinion that’ll be Paul murray’s thinking too as he states he’s considering withdrawing his bid. That comes as no surprise to me, as these Administrators have popped off snide remarks towards TBK’s but it will be confusing for Duff & Phelps – just how much longer can these guys drag their feet! First they didn't do their paperwork correctly and had to waste a week in court (with us paying for their time of course) then they allowed the issue of saving £1m pcm to drag on and on and on and then allowed more and more time for offers to be put forward… These guys are onto a good thing and they’re gonna take some shifting!!!
Clearly Brian Kennedy feels the same. Maybe that's what's behind this story of his bid being rejected - their way of saying "don't try and rush us..."
I’ve always felt ‘Administrators’ should be Government appointed and paid by the treasury with the profit motive removed from the equation and we’re finding out to our considerable cost how right I am! Now, I’m more and more concerned by these delays OUT OF COMMON DECENCY THESE GUYS SHOULD GET THINGS WRAPPED UP AND MOVE ON!
Capitalism... as Spit the Dug would say HUUKFFUUTT!
By the way Craig you delete this thread it'll not matter a toss to me - it was a copy and paste job from elsewhere on the net!
0 -
Moving/stopping my thread - so that's gonna be your childish response Craig! Pathetic abusing the (little) power you have, you won't get the chance of offending me again!
0 -
There seems to be no ignore button on this site but unless you withdraw that insulting 'blind' remark that's what I'll be doing with anything you post!
0 -
I'm totally gobsmacking by internet Rangers supporters lack of understanding about the situation we find ourselves in. TBK's task is twofold 1) to save our club and 2) by involving the fans make the club transparent to all and by doing that bringing REALISM into the equation. What is the online response? (thank God it's just the online brigade). If Rangers fans support TBK's they're labelled BLIND!!! Unfeekingbelievable! Some us these people are happy to give Ally ANOTHER YEAR despite him showing himself to be inept! As I say unfeekinbe...
Paul Murray and his group have the backing of Walter Smith and yet those of us who back them (financially as well as vocally) are told we are BLIND! What an insulting attitude some have! I'll leave it at that as I'm very feeking angry!
Must say the reactions from some fans to TBK's borrowing £5m from Ticketus leaves me very disappointed. Some seem to be still stuck in this false thinking that a rich person is just gonna ride in, sort out the problems, return us to winning ways before selling up and leaving the club in a good footing! I really do despair at times! Listening to that Radio 5 programme last night there was so much optimism that we would survive face the hardships that will come our way and fight our way through them, but then I click on rm and here to see...
It's fine to question things but where's the positive determined vibes? So, we'll need £5 m or so to see us through the 1st stage SO WHAT? So we'll be renegotiate the deal with Ticketus later than we'd like - I'm sure broad terms will have already been agreed. My oh my what are we like?
The chance to live and be in a position to FIGHT our way back to health that's what Paul Murray and the Blue Knights are giving us, have a little faith ffs do you wanna be in a position to fight or have you already given up?
My cash is there for The Blue Knights I wanna fight!
If Rangers do go into Liquidation I won't be supporting Rangers Rovers 2012 - my team will be dead!
0 -
Agreed Allan.
I find it a tad incredulous that some of us seem so keen to blindly accept the BK offer because they support fan representation.
Absolutely EVERY piece of information coming out about their bid suggests that we will end up in greater debt than we already are. There seems to be no cash injection (guarantees do not constitute cash) from them but a willingness to basically buy the club with debt. Now, debt is no bad thing, but we should be seeing a cash injection alongside it - any bid should not be just about buying the club with debt IMO.
Even the working capital they are going to finance. Where is their money ?
BLINDLY!
Yes, I really do despair...
0 -
Not just based on this season - based on when Walter left him in charge for Cup games, I can't recall once when WS didn't leave his chair in the stand to come down and rant at what was going on!
0 -
I agree mate, lesser team would be a better tem to use.
Imo the players gave up playing for Ally well before admin, and tbh can you blame them?
Rangers under Ally have had no plan, no tactics, style or shape. Players getting played out of place and so on.
Yes the players are to blame but i will ask again, is Rangers under Ally different to every other team in football in terms of the manager just keeps getting afree pass?
Under an experienced manager we'd have qualified for Europe, had the SPL title in the bag etc. As a manager of Rangers all one can ask for (too much in my opinion) is one full season - he's had it. Based on this season Ally is an inept manager no one can argue with that!
0 -
I agree mate, lesser team would be a better tem to use.
Imo the players gave up playing for Ally well before admin, and tbh can you blame them?
Rangers under Ally have had no plan, no tactics, style or shape. Players getting played out of place and so on.
Yes the players are to blame but i will ask again, is Rangers under Ally different to every other team in football in terms of the manager just keeps getting afree pass?
Under an experienced manager we'd have qualified for Europe, had the SPL title in the bag etc. As a manager of Rangers all one can ask for (too much in my opinion) is one full season - he's had it. Based on this season Ally is an inept manager no one can argue with that!
0 -
As indeed D&P, Craig Whytes preferred admins are always keen to point out. I can't see anything wrong with using the media in this respect. It goes along with their promise of open and fair business style. You can disagree with them, but as I say, at least you have some info to disagree with.
What are all the other biddrs plans? Other than to claim they've got lots of money. I'm not sure that's the way we should be going down as we should be looking to plan a sustainable future, not depend on big bucks. Our fan base is our big bucks.
Spot on.
Must say the reactions from some fans leave me very disappointed. Some seem to be still stuck in this false thinking that a rich person is just gonna ride in, sort out the problems, return us to winning ways before selling up and leaving the club in a good footing! I really do despair at times! Listening to that Radio 5 programme last night there was so much optimism that we would survive face the hardships that will come our way and fight our way through them, but then I click on rm and here to see...
It's fine to question things but where's the positive determined vibes? So, we'll need £5 m or so to see us through the 1st stage SO WHAT? So we'll be renegotiate the deal with Ticketus later than we'd like - I'm sure broad terms will have already been agreed. My oh my what are we like?
The chance to live and be in a position to FIGHT our way back to health that's what Paul Murray and the Blue Knights are giving us, have a little faith ffs do you wanna be in a position to fight or have you already given up?
My cash is there for The Blue Knights I wanna fight!
If Rangers do go into Liquidation I won't be supporting Rangers Rovers 2012 - my team will be dead!
0 -
I came up with this but I guess you have seen it. http://thestory.ie/2011/09/12/interim-report-on-the-glackin-report/
Yes mate seen it. I think it's gonna need a fair bit of surfing to spot it.
0 -
I genuinely think we have to detach what is happening at the moment from the idea of retaining McCoist as our manager. Ally will always be a legend and his stature has grown during this torrid time for our club but let's not be blinded by all that's gone before on the pitch. Clueless tactics' date=' out of position players, baffling line-ups, player omissions up until January had nothing to do with what's happening off the pitch. I just think we need news ideas across the board: on and off the pitch[/quote']
Totally agree.
This backing of McCoist needs to be emotive as any cold hard look at the facts show he was a very poor manager.
0 -
The lose of one player (Naismith) seems to have totally bamboozled him and he's never got the team playing the same since. You then pile everything else on top it's been a nightmare but that initial injury threw him for 6.
Basically they were playing the same game plan as the tail end of last season, nothing of Ally's doing I think the players just resorted to it themselves tbh. Thing is teams found ways to counter most of it eventually and when they managed to stop Steven Naismith McCoist struggled, during games when teams came up with a plan for Steven, we struggled because Ally was inept to change and to see the problems that we all did.
Once Steven got injured McCoist had no new game plan at all - very poor manager! Has to be Jimmy Calderwood - it seems he might be in line for the Pars game til the end of season so he'll be free!
0 -
Ally has been a failure as manager - I dearly hope the new owners don't keep him on for next season we'll win SFA and still people will want to give him another season.
I've had plenty of debates with people in the Pub and at Ibrox and they usually end their schpeils by saying "but he's a Rangers man through and through - to which I always reply SO IS JIMMY CALDERWOOD!
Let's hope the new owners see through type of emotive blackmail. I'd rather Jimmy the Bag Man got the job of managers than McCoist.
0 -
The Hoops captain said: â??We should have had a penalty. Everyone knew what was happening and I think their coaching staff knew as well, but the referee somehow didnâ??t see it. It was definitely not a dive and he has the scars to prove it.
Scars that could have came from an earlier dive!
Stokes said the defender agreed it was a penalty and now Brown says the Coaching Staff agreed too - the penny doesn't drop with this lot as to the affect all their intimidation has had! Not only referees walking away from the game now we have opposition teams scared of saying anything that would merit a campaign from Celtic FC and their scumbag supporters!
Personally I hope the Championship One take them on - pity they can't move their fans down there too!
0
BBC Claim Brian Kennedy bid for club has been rejected
in Rangers Chat
Posted · Edited by A Horse With No Name
I can see how you would think that! Not true though, my big bug bare is power being abused, which I think is the case here!! I am wrong a fair amount of the time but have always stuck up my hand when that's the case this Admin (as the ones who banned me elsewhere) are really a poor lot! Calling him Adolf seems excessive but I dare say when young Adolf was a young artist he wasn't too bad, small steps...