Bluedell 5,329 Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 But the corporation's deal with the SPL means the BBC must have access to every ground in the SPL as well as key interviews. So the BBC has the deal with the SPL and therefore they would be taking the SPL to court and not Rangers. "It's written on a contract that the BBC has the right to report on games." As far as I'm aware, Rangers will not prevent the BBC from reporting on games. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 The Biased Broadcasting Corporation defending there reputation in court for unbiased and fare reporting on Rangers, that would be the easiest 1k an hour the Rangers QC would earn in his entire puff. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ergatrude 0 Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 It shouldn't be too difficult to compile a list of "incidents" where the BBC have publicly shown their bias, look into the background of the "reporters" who are predisposed to showing it, and, exposing their sources.We must take them on once and for all and show EVERYONE we will not be pushed around. We must NOT back down. Plenty of evidence on youtube. The original BBC sectarian debate program when Mr. McConnell thought he was a hero is on there, 5 parts. I watched it during the night & even though there was plenty of evidence of both sides being guilty the program was definitely swaying to it being our fault. Spiers comment about an Alien landing at Ibrox enrages me everytime I hear it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 The one where they are reporting on the arrests of the Lennon bombers and they cut to their outside reporter for a comment and he's standing outside Ibrox. Says it all for me. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dutchy Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 The BBC may well have a legal right under the contract with the SPL to report on games, but does that give them the right to almost slander the owner of a member club? This seems like a case that should be in court and there's also questions on how the BBC decide to spend taxpayers money, so this may beome very interesting in the weeks/months ahead. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ergatrude 0 Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 They can report on the game by watching it on TV. There is absolutely no need for them to be inside the ground. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dutchy Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 I assume they want to and need an official response after the game and that is probably stated within the contract with the SPL. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 I assume they want to and need an official response after the game and that is probably stated within the contract with the SPL. Written statement given to them at the front door. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dutchy Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 Written statement given to them at the front door. Are you a secret ex-player GA? Probably a defender. Thou shalt not pass. LOL 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ergatrude 0 Posted October 20, 2011 Share Posted October 20, 2011 Maybe we should instruct G4S to "control" them? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.