calscot 0 Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 It seems to me that in hindsight the best thing for SDM to have done would have been to pay off Lloyds £18M, invest 5M and sell the club for £23,000,001... However, he probably didn't have the funds to do so. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 0 Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 In hindsight - maybe we should have done a lot of things, like take the £9M offered for Jela....strange indeed. We were never offered 9M for Jela. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54andcounting 0 Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 We were never offered 9M for Jela. ....Mibeas aye, mibeas naw. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waltersgotstyle 297 Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 The cynic in me says Wyldes decision wasn't totally selfless... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMazza 0 Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 The cynic in me says Wyldes decision wasn't totally selfless... But so what if it isn't? I'm sorry but Wylde is not the cause of Rangers' woes, if it suits him AND the club then big deal. I won't castigate him for it, or any other player. The future of Rangers is completely up in the air so I can understand why there may be "selfish" (not a word I would choose) reasons in amongst the gallant ones 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54andcounting 0 Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Wylde is just a young lad making a career for himself. He recently signed a new contract with a jump in earnings, he's no doubt took on some fresh debt due to his pay hike, so you really couldn't expect him to take a pay cut could you? He probably had more reason than the other players to get out of Ibrox, I don't blame the guy for coming to his decision, no wonder he couldn't sleep at night. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 0 Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 I'd be naive beyond words if I actually thought Wylde left purely to save jobs. He clearly had something else lined up otherwise he'd have stayed. But at the same time his act of rejecting March wage (20 grand maybe) and taking no redundancy package (who knows how much) is to be applauded - that in itself already DOES save jobs and WAS a purely selfless act. He leaves with no ill feeling from me at all, and I hope he has a decent career from here on in. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.