Guest cail Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 MD is entitled to ask questions of any potential new owner just like the rest of us. Please avoid making this personal. While i agree with your point about MDs rights Frankie is there not a difference between personal gain and finding out what is best for the Club at heart? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,182 Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 While i agree with your point about MDs rights Frankie is there not a difference between personal gain and finding out what is best for the Club at heart? I'm sure MD can separate the two mate. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 0 Posted May 9, 2012 Author Share Posted May 9, 2012 You boiled it down to it being pro/anti RST. That is plainly wrong. Actually, you didn't originally dispute that part. You only disputed where the splits manifest themselves, not what caused them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 what makes anyone think tbk would be bad for rangers? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 what makes anyone think tbk would be bad for rangers? I think it's mostly due to the fact they've been around for a long time now, and seemed to have achieved little more than the joke offers of something like a packet of nuts. They're in with Ticketus, then they're not, then they're in with Kennedy but put in a ridiculously low bid and are rejected, now where are they? My impression is that they lack either enough money, enough nous, enough will or a combination of all three. They've hardly portrayed themselves as serious contenders... But then maybe they are playing some long game and will get the job done - but they've still made their impression which can stick. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 Actually, you didn't originally dispute that part. You only disputed where the splits manifest themselves, not what caused them. I know exactly what I disputed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 0 Posted May 9, 2012 Author Share Posted May 9, 2012 I know exactly what I disputed. Yup, problem was you didn't manage to punch in the right combination of letters to convey what was in your head. Now I know. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guardian Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 all valid questions. as they were when asked of miller. But I thought TBK made their bid clear ? Problem is they aren't being asked of TBK. Nor answered by those who would defend them. What good could they ever do Rangers ? Unfortunately them being "Rangers men" doesn't count. Rangersness is not a currency you can buy players with or pay off debts. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 Yup, problem was you didn't manage to punch in the right combination of letters to convey what was in your head. Now I know. You: Am I wrong? Me: Yes, you are..... You read as good as you write. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 But I thought TBK made their bid clear ? Problem is they aren't being asked of TBK. Nor answered by those who would defend them. What good could they ever do Rangers ? Unfortunately them being "Rangers men" doesn't count. Rangersness is not a currency you can buy players with or pay off debts. yeah they have answered most or all of those questions. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.