caseyjones 0 Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 No, the point was that they didn't question TBK's bid. I realise that and have already dealt with it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guardian Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 But there was no such implication. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 But there was no such implication. Why would a group who are 'on the inside' of a bid challenge it publicly? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
3909 04 0 Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 Why would a group who are 'on the inside' of a bid challenge it publicly? For the sake of even-handedness? Otherwise, they risk look like they're pursuing a self-serving agenda. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 Why would a group who are 'on the inside' of a bid challenge it publicly? You don't seem to be listening to what is being said and you're taking things out of context. You can't be expected to be taken seriously when you question other bids without providing the answers to the same questions for the bid for which you are "on the inside." Either answer those same questions or don't publicly ask them of others. Pretty obvious to me. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 For the sake of even-handedness? Otherwise, they risk look like they're pursuing a self-serving agenda. They are pursuing a self-serving agenda. That is why Supporter's Trusts are set up in the first place. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 You don't seem to be listening to what is being said and you're taking things out of context. You can't be expected to be taken seriously when you question other bids without providing the answers to the same questions for the bid for which you are "on the inside." Either answer those same questions or don't publicly ask them of others. Pretty obvious to me. Don't take them seriously then. They have taken their chosen path and will need to live with the consequences of doing so. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
3909 04 0 Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 They are pursuing a self-serving agenda. That is why Supporter's Trusts are set up in the first place. No, I meant "themselves" in the singular rather than the support as a whole. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,342 Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 No, I meant "themselves" in the singular rather than the support as a whole. or their members 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 No, I meant "themselves" in the singular rather than the support as a whole. This Dingwall obsession really is becoming tedious now. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.