chilledbear 16 Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 Does Green and his 20/6/5 member consortium convince you that they are genuine? We were told there were 20, individuals, families, Rangers Supporters from all over the world. Now there are 5/6, I think. Can we trust people who tell us lies, have we not been shafted enough. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 P.T. Barnum. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,186 Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 P.T. Barnum. As much as I'm sceptical about Green, I do think he's genuine enough. I just don't think he can provide what he says he will. Genuine finance has been a problem for all bidders - none are prepared to admit that which is causing them PR grief IMO. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GovanAllan 0 Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 Still found 7mill more than the No Mark Knights, so I will give him a chance. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,061 Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 As much as I'm sceptical about Green, I do think he's genuine enough. I just don't think he can provide what he says he will. Genuine finance has been a problem for all bidders - none are prepared to admit that which is causing them PR grief IMO. Which will lead to Groundhog Day 12,18,24 months down the line.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BAP1872 0 Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 Just a thought, considering a CVA has yet to be agreed, perhaps CG has decided to pull his neck in a bit regarding the "20/6/5 member consortium". Don't think bragging about consortium/available cash would do any good towards getting a CVA accepted. Well I hope that's the case anyway. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UCF2008 0 Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 Is it possible that the numbers involved are dependent on a successful CVA? Can't remember if it was in the media conference or subsequent interviews, but Green did say that a number of consortium members would pull out in the event of a newco. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UCF2008 0 Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 Of course, if that's the case then it's not exactly comforting that we have an £8.5m CVA pot with (supposedly) 20 contributors involved which would then drop to 5/6 if it's not accepted. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UCF2008 0 Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 It's even more disconcerting however if we have 5 or 6 involved with some expected to drop interest if we lose out on the CVA. In that case could you even call it a consortium? ...and what about the max 15% shareholding? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 With regards to who takes over the Gers, does my opinion have any impact? IMO, my opinion would only have impact if it was shared with 50,000 to 60,000 fans. That's impact. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.