Bluedell 5,373 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 If the creditors vote against the D&P figures, the courts can adjudge whether the administrator fees and charges are fair. But it doesn't take away from the fact that Green is putting up £8.5m. I know GS is very pro-TBKs but it isn't help to spin incorrect information. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 It's not less than 5. It's £8.5m. The creditors then approve how that £8.5m gets allocated. ok its 8.5 plus 3.8 minus 3.6 and 3.5 or whatever. the cva is fairly clear it balances out at just under 5. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,373 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 ok its 8.5 plus 3.8 minus 3.6 and 3.5 or whatever. the cva is fairly clear it balances out at just under 5. So you'll start describing the TBK CVA bid as £1.5m? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 But it doesn't take away from the fact that Green is putting up £8.5m. I know GS is very pro-TBKs but it isn't help to spin incorrect information. yes but in this logic bk was putting up over 9. he was funding the club and paying the fees over and above his 5 million for the cva. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 So you'll start describing the TBK CVA bid as £1.5m? I will start describing it as 9.3 minus 3.8 if you prefer with 500k to whyte. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 0 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 But it doesn't take away from the fact that Green is putting up £8.5m. I know GS is very pro-TBKs but it isn't help to spin incorrect information. You'll never stop that! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 what I am saying is greens bid is 8.5 plus outstanding money minus fees and running costs. which comes to under 5 million. bk bid was 5 million for cva pot with fees and running costs payed seperately by him and outstanding money. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 You'll never stop that! if bludell can show me where I am going wrong in my maths I will happily retract my statement. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,344 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Sometimes you can't help but laugh about the arrogance shown by reporters, not least Traynor. D&P have to do this, Green has to do that and whatnot. The God-given right of all reporters to know all and nothing but the truth, the whole truth ... which will they will impartially look at and report upon. And yes, some will say that each Rangers supporter should/has/must be told too. Next, lets go back to the real world. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 the problem with that is the supporters group hate lobby will accuse them of sour grapes even if its a perfectly reasonable question. Posting Traynor's article or Tom English's one would provoke the same reaction. Or they're only after a blazer is another common response. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.