Darthter 542 Posted June 16, 2012 Author Share Posted June 16, 2012 doesn't he say a little more and hopes to raise 4 to 6. he also doesn't look very convincing on it. rangers need 20 - 30 million spending on them to get us where we need to be. that's only going to be possible with everyone on board behind a share issue. for me greens never going to achieve that. he's been at this for 4 months and has a little more than 5.5 million. no doubt he's hoping for more now he has the keys. I notice he hasn't named his foreign investors as promised yet. perhaps they are still sleeping. Valid points.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted June 16, 2012 Share Posted June 16, 2012 The call for no season tickets to be bought indicates Rangers thriving under whatever owner is not the priority for some. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 16, 2012 Share Posted June 16, 2012 The call for no season tickets to be bought indicates Rangers thriving under whatever owner is not the priority for some. not really surprising when you consider where that policy got us over the last 15 year's or so. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
foggy dewhurst 0 Posted June 16, 2012 Share Posted June 16, 2012 mr green will stay as long as it takes for someone to make him a good offer so what if walters consortium were to buy a 50% stake and invest some much needed money at this present moment in time . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted June 16, 2012 Share Posted June 16, 2012 What if he was to outline a clear & concise plan (5yr maybe), on what he plans to do?? Who's actually going to believe him if he starts outlining a plan of what he's going to do over a 5yr period? Not me anyway! When he first arrived on the scene with David Whitehouse of Duff & Phelps, Green claimed to be in it for the long haul. Since that initial press conference his mind seems to have changed every other day on the subject of how long he's going to be here. One minute he's saying he'd like to be in and out again in a jiffy, the next he's saying he'd like to be here for a year or less.... and so it continues, with differing versions to his story every other time he talks. Maybe if he cut down the amount of metaphorical nonsense and hyperbole he could actually get his facts straight and stop contradicting himself. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 16, 2012 Share Posted June 16, 2012 he has indeed made it hard to believe anything he says. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted June 16, 2012 Share Posted June 16, 2012 not really surprising when you consider where that policy got us over the last 15 year's or so. So only 'Rangers men' are good enough? That's the new policy? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWeeBlueDevil 0 Posted June 16, 2012 Share Posted June 16, 2012 So only 'Rangers men' are good enough? That's the new policy? Sounds similar to a policy from across the city know as "Celtic minded" a policy that lead to them chasing a very successful manager out the door ( wee Gordon ) 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 16, 2012 Share Posted June 16, 2012 So only 'Rangers men' are good enough? That's the new policy? the last two rangers men were cunts. no cunts is what's ok. no blindly following cunts is superb. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted June 16, 2012 Share Posted June 16, 2012 the last two rangers men were cunts. no cunts is what's ok. no blindly following cunts is superb. Green has not proven himself to be a cunt. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.