CumbernauldGers 0 Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 Can they explain what difference a new owner would make, or is it the usual facts and conspiracy nuts = oil & Water. FFS man, it's because there PROPER RANGERS MEN, that cancels out anything else, remember? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 6, 2012 Author Share Posted July 6, 2012 Why would it suit him not to be able to put a team on the park, oh that's right he's going to sell everything next month. That report looks bull to me. oh the reports certainly real. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 6, 2012 Author Share Posted July 6, 2012 Can they explain what difference a new owner would make, or is it the usual facts and conspiracy nuts = oil & Water. I'm not sure any other owner would be any different. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
3909 04 0 Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 Can they explain what difference a new owner would make, or is it the usual facts and conspiracy nuts = oil & Water. Ah, that's an easy one. Green is from Yorkshire and he'd never heard of Davie Cooper so obviously he's a crook who is just here to make money from selling the club to the highest bidder. Brown is an ex-player so naturally he deserves to own the club. As soon as Brown's consortium takes control of Rangers, all our enemies will immediately surrender unconditionally. Why? Err, they just will. I trust that clarifies the situation. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 That report does look pretty pathetic and amateurish. Like it was knocked up in half an hour. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,157 Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 Right. Can we discuss the report as opposed to nonsense about other forums? There are a few people skating on thin ice with their constant derailment of almost every thread on the subject. Please respect opposing opinions and lets stick to the facts. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,157 Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 And the facts are that report/presentation is somewhat worrying. However, it doesn't say if our acceptance of sanctions carries over into our SFL presentation. I'd sincerely hope not as if we're unable to sign new players the chances of us being promoted from Division 3 are significantly lower. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Moon 1,114 Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 And the facts are that report/presentation is somewhat worrying. However, it doesn't say is our acceptance of sanctions carries over into our SFL presentation. I'd sincerely hope not as if we're unable to sign new players the chances of us being promoted from Division 3 are significantly lower. Sense at last. Thanks, Frankie. Agreed, on both your posts. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 6, 2012 Author Share Posted July 6, 2012 That report does look pretty pathetic and amateurish. Like it was knocked up in half an hour. that was one of the complaints by one of the chairman wasn't it? it is pretty poor but I'm not sure what they were expecting. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,157 Posted July 6, 2012 Share Posted July 6, 2012 Why would it suit him not to be able to put a team on the park, oh that's right he's going to sell everything next month. That report looks bull to me. The report is genuine. Green held it up at the meeting the other day and claimed (IIRC)_ that it had been published in the media to looks of bewilderment to most present. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.