Is the tide starting to turn for Charles Green?

[the gunslinger 3,366]

its unlikely proof is readily available after all its the kind of think you need to keep secret. there was no proof whyte wasn't paying tax for example but people knew.

 

of course people are well within their right to disbelieve anything they want especially without proof.

 

my only point is Brown isn't just at it here. he believes in what hes doing and saying. as I always say that doesn't make him right but equally he's not some dunk troublemaker being paid to harm us.

[RANGERRAB 3,306]

CG's ultimate aim must be to get Regan out at the SFA and Doncaster out at the SPL. These two are our enemies whichever way you look at it

[simplythebest 0]

its unlikely proof is readily available after all its the kind of think you need to keep secret. there was no proof whyte wasn't paying tax for example but people knew.

 

of course people are well within their right to disbelieve anything they want especially without proof.

 

my only point is Brown isn't just at it here. he believes in what hes doing and saying. as I always say that doesn't make him right but equally he's not some dunk troublemaker being paid to harm us.

 

Good intentions aren't always a valid excuse.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

Good intentions aren't always a valid excuse.

 

absolutely. but I will continue to contest the notion he's at it etc where I see it.

[simplythebest 0]

absolutely. but I will continue to contest the notion he's at it etc where I see it.

I believe he's jumping on any conspiracy that goes about on the internet, maybe not at it but very foolish to try and start such a campaign with zero evidence.

 

The people renewing and Ally's comments indicate it hasn't worked anyway.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

trust me the rumours far more prevelant off the internet. indeed its surprisingly quiet on the internet.

 

as I've said before it won't have a serious impact on ticket sales.

[forlanssister 3,060]

Green now knows who and what his constituents are.

[Stimpy 0]

Green now knows who and what his constituents are.

 

He also knows the big man knew.

[craig 5,199]

its unlikely proof is readily available after all its the kind of think you need to keep secret. there was no proof whyte wasn't paying tax for example but people knew.

 

of course people are well within their right to disbelieve anything they want especially without proof.

 

my only point is Brown isn't just at it here. he believes in what hes doing and saying. as I always say that doesn't make him right but equally he's not some dunk troublemaker being paid to harm us.

 

That isnt right. There WAS proof he wasnt paying the tax. The club just had completely inept corporate governance and segregation of duties procedures in place. Malcolm Murray said this wouldnt happen under his stewardship and the best we can do is give him time to prove the current custodians.

 

But Bomber was shouting fromt he rooftops that Whyte still owned Ibrox (or something similar) - now, if he didnt have facts then he was surmising, or being fed info and if, as you say, these kings are kept secret, then who would be able to do so ???

 

Bomber has performed horribly in this. Like him or not, he didnt do himself any favours. And in some cases I think it was pretty well know he was talking shite. Not in all cases, but some.

 

Ahhhh, if the point you are making is about the "drunk" comments on here then I agree, I personally felt them a bit distasteful.

 

If you mean what he was saying, I disagree, because I still think he was talking shite at worst, and mischief making for absolute certain - even if his intentions were pure.

 

Sadly, in much of this, we wont find out probably.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

there's a diference between knowing something and being able to prove it. I saw a girl's panties on the escalator today.

 

I know that to be a fact but I can't prove it.