pete 2,499 Posted September 18, 2012 Share Posted September 18, 2012 when I go to my bed at night I thank the lord Charles Green is now our chief executive and not Martin Bain. Long may this man be our chief executive - a man who fights for Rangers in every respect. Is that during a quick wank? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted September 19, 2012 Share Posted September 19, 2012 The SPL and the SFA are doing a grand job selling shares for Green & Co. Far smarter than the usual fools is Mr Green but whether what's good for Green & Co is the same thing that's good for RFC I remain to be convinced. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted September 19, 2012 Share Posted September 19, 2012 The SPL and the SFA are doing a grand job selling shares for Green & Co. Far smarter than the usual fools is Mr Green but whether what's good for Green & Co is the same thing that's good for RFC I remain to be convinced. Trust you. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 19, 2012 Share Posted September 19, 2012 I've always wondered what happens if you breach one of them, what's the worst they can do, sue him? they can probably ban him from Scottish football. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted September 19, 2012 Share Posted September 19, 2012 Trust you. Que sera sera. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted September 19, 2012 Share Posted September 19, 2012 they can probably ban him from Scottish football. They'd be denying him a living as CEO then? Court would rip it apart. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 19, 2012 Share Posted September 19, 2012 They'd be denying him a living as CEO then? Court would rip it apart. perhaps. or perhaps their rules on this are clearer. whyte is banned. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted September 19, 2012 Share Posted September 19, 2012 perhaps. or perhaps their rules on this are clearer. whyte is banned. I doubt Whyte or anyone else has gone to the trouble of challenging the ban. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 19, 2012 Share Posted September 19, 2012 I think we better brace ourselves for being stripped of titled. all for not giving copies of some letters. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,429 Posted September 19, 2012 Share Posted September 19, 2012 RANGERS Chief Executive Charles Green said: “We made very clear in the statement that we made that we have never questioned the integrity of the panel. That is beyond reproach. “What I do have an issue with is the fact that the SPL has relentlessly been pursuing a fixed and predetermined agenda on EBTs from the moment they realised that they would not be able to get Rangers back into the SPL without a fan revolt. "Until that moment the SPL were looking to trade SPL status for an admission of guilt on EBTs and a sanction of stripped titles. We couldn’t and didn’t give them that. "You need look no further than the initial draft of the five-way agreement. "There is reference in that to EBTs and the outcome was stripping titles but if I make a statement that the SPL is pursuing a predetermined outcome then I’m bringing the game into disrepute. "From the moment that SPL status for Rangers was off the agenda we‘ve been heading for stripped titles. “What I’m doing is using free speech to tell the fans exactly what has happened and I am now on disrepute charges for matters of fact. "The words that seem to have upset the SFA so much are that “the SPL appoint the jury, set the outcome and set the punishment before the trial” - those things are true and I stand by them. “Whether or not the Commission works to that agenda remains to be seen but let’s be clear there was a predetermined outcome. "If their Chief Executive and lawyers were drafting agreements that contained definitions of titles that would be stripped in late June/early July long before a Commission was even thought about, how can anyone say they are not pursuing an agenda and a predetermined outcome? “I would ask the SFA and the SPL to release the first draft of the five-way agreement put together by their lawyers to reveal all of the sanctions. Stripping of titles was definitely within that document. “In terms of this commission, if the SPL agenda prevails then Rangers will be found guilty and being found guilty we will lose five titles. “If I’m wrong then it will be a different outcome. “What I said before is that this commission is not independent because the SPL have set it up. Saying that they are not independent is not saying that they are not impartial. “That’s what I have an issue with and I will make these points when I go to see the SFA – not unless I’m in jail before then because there will no doubt be 50 odd charges by then. “We want to focus on what’s happening at the club in terms of filling the stadium, going to Annan and filling the town – they are the good things. “But all people want to do is keep chasing Rangers and to chase us to the grave – and we are not going there.” 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.