forlanssister 3,050 Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 mclelland was high up in uefa. or the eca or whatever it was called that replaced the g14. McClelland is a very smart cookie, I don't think he performed his duties during the Whyte regime in the manner in which should/could be expected, basically he let us down. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 13, 2012 Author Share Posted November 13, 2012 probably but how much did he know? he resigned saying they were being told nothing. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 probably but how much did he know? he resigned saying they were being told nothing. Point is it was his business to know. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 13, 2012 Author Share Posted November 13, 2012 Point is it was his business to know. yes but how do you find out and if you cant what else do you do but resign? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 yes but how do you find out and if you cant what else do you do but resign? McClelland had an extremely successful business career outside of RFC, he'd be well versed on what was required and would have been well aware that things were not as they should be i.e the absence of board meeting etc. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 13, 2012 Author Share Posted November 13, 2012 agreed but thats why he left. didn't he go about 5 months into whytes reign? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 13, 2012 Author Share Posted November 13, 2012 they left on october 17th saying they hadnt been included in coroprate governance a the club. should they have said more or left earlier. perhaps. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BoK360 Posted November 13, 2012 Share Posted November 13, 2012 they left on october 17th saying they hadnt been included in coroprate governance a the club. should they have said more or left earlier. perhaps. They should have done both. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 McClelland is a very smart cookie, I don't think he performed his duties during the Whyte regime in the manner in which should/could be expected, basically he let us down. We could say the same about quite a number of people who were actually in very well paid full time jobs at the club. The silence from some of those people was more of a let down because there must have been relatively frequent discussions behind the scenes regarding WTF was going on at the club after Greig & McClelland resigned. There's obviously the issue of a written or unwritten NDA stopping people from talking about the club's business, but when some muppet like Whyte walks in and starts destroying the club any NDA's in place should have went out the window. There's quite a few people still employed full time at the club to this day who MUST have known Whyte was driving the club towards a cliff and they said sweet Fanny Adams. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted November 14, 2012 Share Posted November 14, 2012 I should add.... Personally, I think a lot of the Rangers men still at the club who said they didn't know anything was going on and they didn't have a clue how bad things were... are liars. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.