ComeOffit 0 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Lol I now find myself having to defend Green in the face of you're deranged logic. STB, the evil genius. He's even got me saying that green is right in this case. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 You think we should just let the tribunal happen without any legal team from Rangers present? Is that what you are saying? I believe the 'tribunal' is a sham that had the verdict decided long ago, and the only real fight is the proper legal route. The fact Green has gone back on that stance shows a disappointing lack of backbone. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComeOffit 0 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 I believe the 'tribunal' is a sham that had the verdict decided long ago, and the only real fight is the proper legal route. The fact Green has gone back on that stance shows a disappointing lack of backbone. No, it shows that he's found someone to fund what he should be funding. They're his titles, so he keeps telling us. The truth is, he doesn't really care if we keep them or not. All he see's are the legal bills, for no great return.(financially) 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,066 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 I am here you know. Yes I know. STB, the evil genius. He's even got me saying that green is right in this case. But we're pure anti Green and all that. I believe the 'tribunal' is a sham that had the verdict decided long ago, and the only real fight is the proper legal route. The fact Green has gone back on that stance shows a disappointing lack of backbone. On the contrary it shows a grasp of reality. You try appealing to the court against a judgement when you refused to engage in the process. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 No, it shows that he's found someone to fund what he should be funding. They're his titles, so he keeps telling us. The truth is, he doesn't really care if we keep them or not. All he see's are the legal bills, for no great return.(financially) Our history is a big part of his sell to investors. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComeOffit 0 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Our history is a big part of his sell to investors. Nah, all investors care about are future incomes. Some suit in London doesn't care if we have 4/5 less titles to our name. Besides, most of the selling is done.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,360 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 What else should the RFFF be used for if not this ? I'd rather the club kept its money for squad investment once the illegal embargo is lifted 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 Nah, all investors care about are future incomes. Some suit in London doesn't care if we have 4/5 less titles to our name. Besides, most of the selling is done.... With titles come money. Anyway, I really think I need a break from this place. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 its a lot harder to preside over a sham with a qc watching your every move. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComeOffit 0 Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 With titles come money. Anyway, I really think I need a break from this place. Relax man, it's nothing personal. It's good to have both side of any debate. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.