Jump to content

 

 

Whyte v Green - Who owns Rangers? (The Sun)


Recommended Posts

It would appear that Whyte got played at his own game, Green and his pals kept him sweet to secure his shares and promised him anything he wanted to hear to keep it that way.

 

When it started to become clear Whyte was irrelevant they gradually moved away from him, by this time it would appear that Whyte had a feeling that Green was doing an end run on him and desperately sent off money to try and keep himself in the game. This will be the irrelevant sum of 137K that he won't take back.

 

Of course a couple of others will be along just shortly to give you the jackanory version. :)

 

See look Jackanory has started in the above post.

 

To be fair, Govan, it's still 137k more than Charles invested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But you keep saying Green lies so obviously The No Money Knights could've done a deal.

 

well if your saying every word green has ever said is a lie i won't argue and yes kennedy may have had a deal. we know he offered 500k. much more than greens supposed 2 quid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if your saying every word green has ever said is a lie i won't argue and yes kennedy may have had a deal. we know he offered 500k. much more than greens supposed 2 quid.

 

So you'd be happier with Whyte getting 500K after what he did to us than the £2 he got. :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is going to pay 60-80 million for the club as Green has been quoted as saying it is worth. The Rangers men wouldn't even pay 5.5 so they are out.

 

But buying Green and the Sevco investors won't cost you 60mill they only control about 25%.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you'd be happier with Whyte getting 500K after what he did to us than the £2 he got. :confused:

 

Who possibly coundn't?

 

It would have meant we'd successfully exited administration via a CVA and had absolutely f*&k all to with Whyte much, much preferable to the current unedifying position surely?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who possibly coundn't?

 

It would have meant we'd successfully exited administration via a CVA and had absolutely f*&k all to with Whyte much, much preferable to the current unedifying position surely?

 

C'mon FS, CVA was never on and you think the slimy bassa would've just walked away for 500K after getting a CVA.

 

500K was to go away after newco.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.