Rangers chairman must stand up in club civil war between Ally McCoist Charles Green

[the gunslinger 3,366]

jackson claims to support liverpool but he grew up in a rangers supporting household as a rangers fan. he broke the mo johnston story as a 16 year old. or gave it to toxic jack rather.

[der Berliner 3,319]

It was a mild stir in a teacup at best, now people want to make it look like outright war in the Rangers HQ. Red topy at their worst ... and that is probably the highest standard they can get.

[UCF2008 0]

It was a mild stir in a teacup at best, now people want to make it look like outright war in the Rangers HQ. Red topy at their worst ... and that is probably the highest standard they can get.

 

It's not just the red tops. They're all at it. They seem to want to paint a daily picture of Rangers as a club in crisis right now. I wonder why?

[GovanAllan 0]

It's like wading through shit day after day.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

It was a mild stir in a teacup at best, now people want to make it look like outright war in the Rangers HQ. Red topy at their worst ... and that is probably the highest standard they can get.

 

or it was an admission that our current ceo was in bed with the greatest disaster in rangers history and that he lied to us about it.

[der Berliner 3,319]

or it was an admission that our current ceo was in bed with the greatest disaster in rangers history and that he lied to us about it.

 

Another storm in the teacup, as has been pointed out before. Everyone willing to get Rangers via a CVA had to talk to the then-majority shareholder. Be it McColl, Kennedy, King or the Blue Knights. Would all the others have told you that they've spoken to Whyte ahead of the CVA? Maybe yes, maybe no.

 

Right now, people placing meanings into McCoist's words, despite him saying in that very same interview that they have had a positive talk after they spoke to one another after the "Green & Whyte" revelations. It is obvious that a manager has to defend his players in public after a good performance and an - in the end - solid (by points at least) title win. We probably have to wait for another 24 hours to get some sort of statement from the club. As it is, the media make a farce of it ... and IMHO not without a reason.

[simplythebest 0]

or it was an admission that our current ceo was in bed with the greatest disaster in rangers history and that he lied to us about it.

 

You were the one who wanted a CVA so badly, what other choice was there?

[the gunslinger 3,366]

talking to whyte is fine, being found by him..... taking money off him..... hiding the exact sum because its an interesting number....

[simplythebest 0]

talking to whyte is fine, being found by him..... taking money off him..... hiding the exact sum because its an interesting number....

Where has it actually been revealed they were found by him?

[Guest DietofWorms]

Where has it actually been revealed they were found by him?

 

Hey hey!... let's not let facts get in the way of wild speculation and giving credence to dirty Sun stories.

Let's call our CEO a conman and lump him in with Whyte....if the troobloohow'dyoudo Knights actually stepped in with a real

bid...they would have had the same meetings with Whyte and be subjected to the same sleekit shite from Whyte, 'cause whether we like it or not Whyte held all the cards and we were sliding towards oblivion.

Green needs to choose if he's here for the long or short game, yes... but he's a 100% more legit than Whyte and we need to remember it's not even been a year since our nadir.