aweebluesoandso 290 Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Does anyone know whether the SFL managed to obtain an indemnity from future litigation and any historical debt from the previous insolvent SPL? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 A footballing man should be at the helm. Kenny Dalglish would be my choice. I'm always a bit perplexed when his name is touted as a voice of reason and diplomacy. Great player (and decent manager) that he was he has done nothing to show me that he has leader qualities in an overseeing capacity. He can be as erratic as the worst of them (as the Bairds Bar press conference debacle showed). He's no Kissinger!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reaper 0 Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 For the "prods" on here, the guy you supposedly worship was the epitome of humility and being humble was at the centre of his teachings. He also taught against pride which in your religion is one of the deadly sins... Psalms 25:9 He leads the humble in what is right, and teaches the humble his way. Proverbs 11:2 When pride comes, then comes disgrace, but with the humble is wisdom. Fixed that for you. The Apostle Paul sometimes approved of pride and even was proud himself. The NIV quotes him as saying to the Corinthians, “I take great pride in you” (2 Corinthians 7:4), and that he was giving them “an opportunity to take pride in us” (2 Corinthians 5:12); and to the Galatians (6:4): “Each one should test his own actions. Then he can take pride in himself.” The more literal Revised Standard Version translates the relevant words of Romans 15:17 as “I have reason to be proud of my work for God”; 1 Corinthians 15:31 as “I protest, brethren, by my pride in you which I have in Christ Jesus”; 2 Corinthians 1:14 as “you can be proud of us as we can be of you”; and Philippians 2:16 as “so that in the day of Christ I may be proud that I did not run in vain or labor in vain.” 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,279 Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Call me cynical, but when it come to monotheistic religion and morals and all ... Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able, and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able or willing? Then why call him God? ... and that comes from philosophers around 300 B.C.E.. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juancornetto 1 Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,279 Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 A better place would be Wikipedia, actually. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Trust in Allah. But tie up your camel just in case. - Confucius 502 BC 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 743 Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 I'm always a bit perplexed when his name is touted as a voice of reason and diplomacy. Great player (and decent manager) that he was he has done nothing to show me that he has leader qualities in an overseeing capacity. He can be as erratic as the worst of them (as the Bairds Bar press conference debacle showed). He's no Kissinger!! Well anyone who quotes Kissenger in that sense doesnt deserve to be debated with. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Well anyone who quotes Kissenger in that sense doesnt deserve to be debated with. (Kissenger + diplomacy?) Ok cool. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.