Guest kenjay Posted August 29, 2013 Share Posted August 29, 2013 I'd be surprised - no astonished - if the legalities weren't in order. Really would be a schoolboy error... I wouldn't be. Arrogance has a tendency to overlook minor details like legalities. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted August 29, 2013 Share Posted August 29, 2013 I wouldn't be. Arrogance has a tendency to overlook minor details like legalities. who has been arrogant? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTinMan99 0 Posted August 29, 2013 Share Posted August 29, 2013 You are right to the extent that all the directors have to stand for re-election and presumably other nominations could be made given due notice. I think I am correct in saying that at the time the requisition was submitted there had been no indication of an imminent AGM; so the EGM may indeed be redundant. I'm not sure when we were obliged to hold the AGM, but I assume it's a yearly event given it's name. If anything, the requisition has brought the AGM forward and given it a semi-solid date, so it's already served it's purpose in a way. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 "The Board, which is determined not to incur unnecessary cost for the Club, has therefore secured an extension to the written commitment from the Requisitioners to withdraw potentially the Requisition pending agreement as stated above. If no agreement is reached by the close of business on 30 August 2013, the Board will be required to send notice to shareholders to convene the General Meeting by no later than 5 September 2013." So when will we know? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 "The Board, which is determined not to incur unnecessary cost for the Club, has therefore secured an extension to the written commitment from the Requisitioners to withdraw potentially the Requisition pending agreement as stated above. If no agreement is reached by the close of business on 30 August 2013, the Board will be required to send notice to shareholders to convene the General Meeting by no later than 5 September 2013." So when will we know? Someone burning the midnight oil perhaps? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTinMan99 0 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Someone burning the midnight oil perhaps? Burning the bank statements more like.......... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted August 30, 2013 Author Share Posted August 30, 2013 I'm surprised that we haven't heard anything today. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 I'm surprised that we haven't heard anything today. Does the Stock Exchange have to be informed first ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted August 30, 2013 Author Share Posted August 30, 2013 Does the Stock Exchange have to be informed first ? Yes, I think so, but we should have heard something by now. Can only assume they've decided to leave an announcement till Monday. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Burning the bank statements more like.......... And deleting the files from the hard drive 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.